A reliability study of the new Back Strain Monitor based on clinical trials

A new Back Strain Monitor (BSM) device has been developed in order to measure, record and analyze movements of the lower back. The purpose of this study was to examine the inter-tester and the intra-tester reliability of the movement measurements given by the BSM accelerometers, and compare it with the reliability of two other conventional measurement methods: the Double Inclinometer method (DI) and the Modified-Modified Schober (MMS) method. The clinical studies included 23 participants (16 males, 7 females) with no recent history of lower back pain, who wore the device during a combination of different anatomical movements (flexion, extension, left lateral flexion and right lateral flexion of the lumber spine). The tests were conducted by three therapists (testers). The reliability results for the BSM accelerometers clearly outperform the results obtained for the DI and the MMS methods. The inter-tester reliability gives the Intra-Class Correlation (ICC) value of 0.95 for the BSM flexion, 0.89 for the DI flexion and 0.74 for the MMS. The intra-tester reliability gives the ICC value of 0.99 for BSM flexion, 0.94 for DI flexion and 0.77 for the MMS. The BSM accelerometers were highly reliable in assessing back movements, measuring these movements with less error than the DI and MMS methods.

[1]  T. Mayer,et al.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. , 1984, Spine.

[2]  F. Biering-Sørensen.  Physical measurements as risk indicators for low-back trouble over a one-year period. , 1984, Spine.

[3]  J M Rothstein,et al.  Reliability of clinical measurements of forward bending using the modified fingertip-to-floor method. , 1990, Physical therapy.

[4]  G. Waddell,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Clinical Measurement of the Lumbar Spine in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain , 1991 .

[5]  J. M. Rothstein,et al.  Reliability of the attraction method for measuring lumbar spine backward bending. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[6]  M J Pearcy,et al.  Correlation between radiographic and clinical measurement of lumbar spine movement. , 1983, British journal of rheumatology.

[7]  Hermanus J. Hermens,et al.  Inertial sensing in ambulatory back load estimation , 1996, Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  J W Frymoyer,et al.  Segmental Motion and Instability , 1987, Spine.

[10]  J. M. Rothstein,et al.  Reliability of clinical measurements of lumbar lordosis taken with a flexible rule. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[11]  David Mitton,et al.  3D reconstruction method from biplanar radiography using non-stereocorresponding points and elastic deformable meshes , 2000, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[13]  R W Norman,et al.  Biomechanical and psychosocial risk factors for low back pain at work. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[14]  C. Richards,et al.  Validity and Reliability of a New Electrogoniometer for the Measurement of Sagittal Dorsolumbar Movements , 1991, Spine.

[15]  M J Pearcy,et al.  A Prospective Study of Lumbar Spinal Movements Before and After Discectomy Using Biplanar Radiography: Correlation of Clinical and Radiographic Findings , 1985, Spine.

[16]  K. H. Nilsen,et al.  Evaluation of low back pain and assessment of lumbar corsets with and without back supports. , 1981, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[17]  J L Merritt,et al.  Measurement of trunk flexibility in normal subjects: reproducibility of three clinical methods. , 1986, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[18]  D. C. Howell.  Statistical Methods for Psychology , 1987 .

[19]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Role of Dynamic Three-Dimensional Trunk Motion in Occupationally-Related Low Back Disorders: The Effects of Workplace Factors, Trunk Position, and Trunk Motion Characteristics on Risk of Injury , 1993, Spine.

[20]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health measurement scales , 2008 .

[21]  W S Marras,et al.  Biomechanical risk factors for occupationally related low back disorders. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[22]  Joshua C. T. Khoo,et al.  An accurate and robust gyroscope-gased pedometer , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[23]  Jennifer Keating,et al.  Unreliable inferences from reliable measurements. , 1998, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[24]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 5: Reliability of Range-of-Motion Measures in the Sagittal Plane and an In Vivo Torso Rotation Measurement Technique , 1986, Spine.

[25]  Isometric maximal and submaximal trunk extension at different flexed positions in standing. Triaxial torque output and EMG. , 1993, Spine.

[26]  R. McKenzie.  Treat Your Own Back , 1984 .

[27]  L. Haugh,et al.  Repeatability of Four Clinical Methods for Assessment of Lumbar Spinal Motion , 1988, Spine.

[28]  Nikolai Bogduk,et al.  Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine , 1987 .

[29]  S. Stuckey,et al.  Reliability of measuring trunk motions in centimeters. , 1982, Physical therapy.

[30]  C J Snijders,et al.  Continuous measurements of spine movements in normal working situations over periods of 8 hours or more. , 1987, Ergonomics.

[31]  T. Sakuragi,et al.  Skin blood flow and plasma catecholamine concentrations during removal of a phaeochromocytoma in a child. , 2004, British journal of anaesthesia.

[32]  E. Jovanov,et al.  Reconfigurable intelligent sensors for health monitoring: a case study of pulse oximeter sensor , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .