Owners of second homes, locals and their attitudes towards future rural wind farm

Wind power has been identified as one of the most promising sources of renewable energy. However, its diffusion has not been as rapid as anticipated. The objective here is to analyse attitudes towards wind power among Finnish local residents and owners of second homes. First, we assess their existing knowledge of and level of interest in energy issues and wind power. Second, we analyse potential differences in attitudes between the two stakeholder groups when it comes to wind power in general and the proposed wind farm in particular. The study draws on both quantitative survey data and qualitative interview data. One of the key findings concerns the different perceptions among locals and owners of second homes in a rural area. Both groups were interested in questions of energy production and accepted wind power in general. Nevertheless, the proposed project in Ruokolahti seemed to polarize attitudes. This paper offers new insights into attitudes to wind energy among Finnish locals and owners of second homes in the same area.

[1]  Paris A. Fokaides,et al.  Promotion of wind energy in isolated energy systems: the case of the Orites wind farm , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[2]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments , 2008 .

[3]  Kati Pitkänen,et al.  Second home countryside. Representations of the rural in Finnish popular discourses , 2010 .

[4]  Karen Smith Stegen,et al.  The winds of change: How wind firms assess Germany's energy transition , 2013 .

[5]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Exploring the landscape of wind farm developments; local area characteristics and planning process outcomes in rural England , 2010 .

[6]  T. L. Brown,et al.  Gender-Biased Data in Survey Research Regarding Wildlife , 2007 .

[7]  Claire Haggett,et al.  Understanding public responses to offshore wind power , 2011 .

[8]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Attitudes towards on-land and offshore wind power development in Denmark; choice of development strategy , 2008 .

[9]  Kristina Ek,et al.  Quantifying the environmental impacts of renewable energy : the case of Swedish wind power , 2006 .

[10]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Attitudes towards offshore wind farms--The role of beach visits on attitude and demographic and attitude relations , 2010 .

[11]  Jacob Ladenburg,et al.  Visual impact assessment of offshore wind farms and prior experience , 2009 .

[12]  Kristina Ek Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power , 2005 .

[13]  Berit Hasler,et al.  Assessing acceptability of two onshore wind power development schemes: A test of viewshed effects and the cumulative effects of wind turbines , 2013 .

[14]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  Public understanding of and support for wind power in the United States , 2010 .

[15]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’ , 2007 .

[16]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[17]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study , 2011 .

[18]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy , 2005 .

[19]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept , 2007 .

[20]  Elizabeth Devlin,et al.  Factors Affecting Public Acceptance of Wind Turbines in Sweden , 2005 .

[21]  Daniel R. Williams,et al.  The summer cottage: a dream in the Finnish forest. , 2006 .

[22]  Vilja Varho,et al.  Wind power in Finland up to the year 2025 , 2005 .

[23]  M. Ollikainen,et al.  Valuation of environmental and societal trade-offs of renewable energy sources , 2013 .

[24]  A. Jobert,et al.  Local acceptance of wind energy: Factors of success identified in French and German case studies , 2007 .

[25]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[26]  Kari Espegren,et al.  The impact of future energy demand on renewable energy production – Case of Norway , 2013 .

[27]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[28]  P. Martinsson,et al.  Does money talk? — The effect of a monetary attribute on the marginal values in a choice experiment , 2014 .

[29]  C. Gross,et al.  Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance , 2007 .

[30]  Søren Krohn,et al.  On public attitudes towards wind power , 1999 .

[31]  Mhairi Aitken,et al.  Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power: A critique of key assumptions within the literature , 2010 .

[32]  Yuxuan Wang,et al.  Life cycle assessment of CO2 emissions from wind power plants: Methodology and case studies , 2012 .

[33]  Hannele Holttinen,et al.  The impact of large scale wind power production on the Nordic electricity system , 2004 .

[34]  M. Slattery,et al.  Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making , 2010 .

[35]  Maria Johansson,et al.  Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception , 2007 .

[36]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Landscape externalities from onshore wind power , 2010 .

[37]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Understanding 'local' opposition to wind development in the UK: How big is a backyard? , 2010 .

[38]  Andreas Kontoleon,et al.  Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: A choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands , 2009 .

[39]  Rolf Wüstenhagen,et al.  Whatever the customer wants, the customer gets? Exploring the gap between consumer preferences and default electricity products in Germany , 2013 .