Comparison of explicit finite element and mechanical simulation of the proximal femur during dynamic drop-tower testing.

Current screening techniques based on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measurements are unable to identify the majority of people who sustain hip fractures. Biomechanical examination of such events may help determine what predisposes a hip to be susceptible to fracture. Recently, drop-tower simulations of in-vitro sideways falls have allowed the study of the mechanical response of the proximal human femur at realistic impact speeds. This technique has created an opportunity to validate explicit finite element (FE) models against dynamic test data. This study compared the outcomes of 15 human femoral specimens fractured using a drop tower with complementary specimen-specific explicit FE analysis. Correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) were found to be moderate for whole bone stiffness comparison (R(2)=0.3476 and 22.85% respectively). No correlation was found between experimentally and computationally predicted peak force, however, energy absorption comparison produced moderate correlation and RMSE (R(2)=0.4781 and 29.14% respectively). By comparing predicted strain maps to high speed video data we demonstrated the ability of the FE models to detect vulnerable portions of the bones. Based on our observations, we conclude that there exists a need to extend the current apparent level material models for bone to cover higher strain rates than previously tested experimentally.

[1]  Sheryl Zimmerman,et al.  Changes in functional status attributable to hip fracture: a comparison of hip fracture patients to community-dwelling aged. , 2003, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia. , 1999, Bone.

[3]  B Helgason,et al.  Development of a balanced experimental-computational approach to understanding the mechanics of proximal femur fractures. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[4]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Validation of subject-specific automated p-FE analysis of the proximal femur. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[6]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Peter Augat,et al.  An investigation to determine if a single validated density-elasticity relationship can be used for subject specific finite element analyses of human long bones. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  A Oloyede,et al.  The dramatic influence of loading velocity on the compressive response of articular cartilage. , 1992, Connective tissue research.

[9]  P. Cripton,et al.  Development of an inertia-driven model of sideways fall for detailed study of femur fracture mechanics. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Fabio Feldman,et al.  Reducing hip fracture risk during sideways falls: evidence in young adults of the protective effects of impact to the hands and stepping. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  S. Haleem,et al.  Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. , 2008, Injury.

[12]  M. Järvinen,et al.  Majority of Hip Fractures Occur as a Result of a Fall and Impact on the Greater Trochanter of the Femur: A Prospective Controlled Hip Fracture Study with 206 Consecutive Patients , 1999, Calcified Tissue International.

[13]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Reproducibility and Side Differences of Mechanical Tests for Determining the Structural Strength of the Proximal Femur , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[14]  Yifei Dai,et al.  Robust QCT/FEA Models of Proximal Femur Stiffness and Fracture Load During a Sideways Fall on the Hip , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Ct-based finite element models can be used to estimate experimentally measured failure loads in the proximal femur. , 2012, Bone.

[16]  G Lowet,et al.  Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. , 1997, Bone.

[17]  J. McGarry,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Characterisation of the Elasto-Plastic Properties of Bovine Trabecular Bone and a Trabecular Bone Analogue Abstract , 2019 .

[18]  Guido Gerig,et al.  User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Zohar Yosibash,et al.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  H. Skinner,et al.  Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  F. Kainberger,et al.  A nonlinear QCT-based finite element model validation study for the human femur tested in two configurations in vitro. , 2013, Bone.

[23]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  S. Cummings,et al.  BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long‐Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[25]  C. Cooper,et al.  The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life. , 1997, The American journal of medicine.

[26]  M. Viceconti,et al.  On the mechanical stability of porous coated press fit titanium implants: a finite element study of a pushout test. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  P. Cripton,et al.  During sideways falls proximal femur fractures initiate in the superolateral cortex: evidence from high-speed video of simulated fractures. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  O. Johnell,et al.  An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[29]  P. Cripton,et al.  Proximal femur elastic behaviour is the same in impact and constant displacement rate fall simulation. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Effects of loading rate on strength of the proximal femur , 1994, Calcified Tissue International.

[32]  Werner Schmoelz,et al.  Limited V-shaped cement augmentation of the proximal femur to prevent secondary hip fractures , 2013, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[33]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Accuracy of finite element predictions in sideways load configurations for the proximal human femur. , 2012, Journal of Biomechanics.

[34]  J. Keyak Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models. , 2001, Medical engineering & physics.

[35]  P. Cripton,et al.  Proximal femur bone strength estimated by a computationally fast finite element analysis in a sideways fall configuration. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Philippe Autier,et al.  Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a prospective controlled study , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[38]  P. Jalovaara,et al.  Functional ability after hip fracture among patients home-dwelling at the time of fracture. , 2004, Central European journal of public health.

[39]  O. Löfman,et al.  Health-related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[40]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  Effect of the "squat protective response" on impact velocity during backward falls. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[42]  K. Khan,et al.  Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[43]  S. Ponzer,et al.  Quality of Life After a Stable Trochanteric Fracture-A Prospective Cohort Study on 148 Patients , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[44]  D Mitton,et al.  An anatomical subject-specific FE-model for hip fracture load prediction , 2008, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[45]  W C Hayes,et al.  Postyield behavior of subchondral trabecular bone. , 1976, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  L. Nordsletten,et al.  Consequences of hip fracture on activities of daily life and residential needs , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[47]  F. Linde,et al.  Mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Dependency on strain rate. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.