In vivo evaluation of an objective method to select power Doppler wall filter cut-off frequency for microvascular quantification

Operator-dependent settings such as the wall filter cut-off frequency control the incidence of artifacts in Doppler images and limit the reliability of comparisons of Doppler vascular indices across longitudinal studies. To address this problem, the wall filter selection curve (WFSC) method was developed to objectively select the cut-off frequency. This paper reports the first evaluation of the effectiveness of the WFSC method for imaging a tumor model. 3-D power Doppler data were acquired from murine breast cancer tumors over a six-week study and the WFSC method was applied to select a cut-off frequency for the wall filter. Images reconstructed using the WFSC method were compared to images processed using a fixed cut-off frequency. Selection curves for tumor images were consistent with flow-phantom data from previous studies. The mean WFSC-selected cut-off showed significant variation among images acquired at different time points from each tumor (two-way ANOVA, p <; 0.0001), which demonstrates the relevance of adjusting the cut-off frequency to match changing flow conditions. 3-D images processed using the WFSC method depicted additional vascular structures compared to volumes processed using a fixed cut-off frequency. Therefore, the WFSC method can facilitate acquisition of reliable Doppler images by inexperienced or time-sensitive operators.

[1]  James C Lacefield,et al.  Improved objective selection of power Doppler wall-filter cut-off velocity for accurate vascular quantification. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  M. Jong,et al.  Imaging preclinical tumour models: improving translational power , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[3]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Optimization of real-time high-frequency ultrasound for blood flow imaging in the microcirculation , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[4]  James C. Lacefield,et al.  Objective Selection of High-Frequency Power Doppler Wall Filter Cutoff Velocity for Regions of Interest Containing Multiple Small Vessels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Badrinath Roysam,et al.  A 2-D/3-D model-based method to quantify the complexity of microvasculature imaged by in vivo multiphoton microscopy. , 2005, Microvascular research.

[6]  Attila Kuba,et al.  A 3D 6-subiteration thinning algorithm for extracting medial lines , 1998, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[7]  James C Lacefield,et al.  Detectability of small blood vessels with high-frequency power Doppler and selection of wall filter cut-off velocity for microvascular imaging. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Analysis of Tumor Vascularity Using Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  N. Raine-Fenning,et al.  Quantitative three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography: a flow‐free phantom experiment to evaluate the relationship between color gain, depth and signal artifact , 2010, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  Mai Elfarnawany,et al.  A new three-component signal model to objectively select power Doppler wall filter cut-off velocity for quantitative microvascular imaging , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[12]  James C Lacefield,et al.  A method to validate quantitative high-frequency power doppler ultrasound with fluorescence in vivo video microscopy. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[14]  K V Ramnarine,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of machine settings on quantitative three‐dimensional power Doppler angiography: an in‐vitro flow phantom experiment , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.