Associative Basis of Landmark Learning and Integration in Vertebrates.

Early work on spatial navigation evaluated what stimuli (kinesthetic or extra-maze) support small-scale navigation and the nature of the underlying learning (place versus response) process. Contemporary research has focused primarily on how cues interact to determine spatial search. This review covers three general findings from research on landmark-based spatial search in vertebrates. First, pigeons and rats encode simple spatial maps in both open-field and touchscreen environments. Second, a nascent literature shows how simple maps can be integrated into complex maps through higher-order associative processes. The spatial-integration hypothesis provides an associative mechanism for spatial mapping that serves as an alternative to a previously posed configural mechanism. Finally, the evidence for associative cue-competition phenomena in landmark learning is reviewed-focusing on blocking and overshadowing. These findings support a role for associative learning in spatial tasks and provide a powerful explanatory framework for understanding cue integration and competition effects in landmark learning.

[1]  S B STOLZ,et al.  ESTABLISHMENT IN RATS OF A PERSISTENT RESPONSE PRODUCING A NET LOSS OF REINFORCEMENT. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  D. P. Scharlock,et al.  The role of extramaze cues in place and response learning. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  R. Douglas Cues for spontaneous alternation. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  R. Cook,et al.  Spatial memory and the performance of rats and pigeons in the radial-arm maze , 1981 .

[5]  Marcia L. Spetch Further studies of pigeons’ spatial working memory in the open-field task , 1990 .

[6]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements , 1994 .

[7]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  K. Bättig,et al.  Effects of maze geometry and experience on exploratory behavior in the rat , 1976 .

[9]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[10]  R. Thouless Experimental Psychology , 1939, Nature.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Handbook of contemporary learning theories , 2000 .

[12]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons’ Use of Landmarks for Spatial Search in a Laboratory Arena and in Digitized Images of the Arena , 1997 .

[13]  C. T. Morgan,et al.  Handbook of psychological research on the rat. , 1951 .

[14]  W. S. Small Experimental Study of the Mental Processes of the Rat. II , 1901 .

[15]  Place and response learning: learning to alternate. , 1955, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[16]  E. Tolman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning. I. Orientation and the short-cut. 1946. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  D. Olton,et al.  Animal Behavior Processes , 2022 .

[18]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Overshadowing in the spatial domain , 1999 .

[19]  A. Blaisdell,et al.  Recovery from blocking achieved by extinguishing the blocking CS , 1999 .

[20]  Aaron P. Blaisdell,et al.  Blocking of spatial control by landmarks in rats , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[21]  J. Pearce A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[22]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Control of pigeons' spatial search by graphic landmarks in a touch-screen task. , 1993 .

[23]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Competition between landmarks in spatial learning: The role of proximity to the goal , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[24]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[25]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[26]  M L Spetch,et al.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[27]  Jeffrey S. Katz,et al.  Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[28]  E. Thorndike Experimental Study of the Mental Processes of the Rat. , 1901 .

[29]  Steven W Badelt,et al.  Capacitive sensors for detecting proximity and response , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[30]  R Biegler,et al.  Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  J. O’Keefe,et al.  Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: Why they fire where they fire , 1978, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  A. A. Artigas,et al.  Human overshadowing in a virtual pool: Simple guidance is a good competitor against locale learning , 2003 .

[33]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Characteristics of pigeons’ spatial working memory in an open-field task , 1988 .

[34]  C. L. Hull Principles of behavior : an introduction to behavior theory , 1943 .

[35]  渡辺 茂,et al.  Rational animals, irrational humans , 2009 .

[36]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  The comparator hypothesis: A response rule for the expression of associations. , 1988 .

[37]  K. Cheng,et al.  The determination of direction in landmark-based spatial search in pigeons: A further test of the vector sum model , 1994 .

[38]  A C Kamil,et al.  Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[39]  C. Warden,et al.  Direction Orientation in Maze Running by the White Rat , 1932 .

[40]  Kenneth J Leising,et al.  Behavioral research in pigeons with ARENA: An Automated Remote Environmental Navigation Apparatus , 2009, Behavioural Processes.

[41]  A. Blaisdell The Role of Associative Processes in Spatial , Temporal , and Causal Cognition , 2009 .

[42]  Ken Cheng,et al.  More psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  D. Olton Mazes, maps, and memory. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[44]  A. Bennett,et al.  Do animals have cognitive maps? , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[45]  Sharon R. Doerkson,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans : II . Generality Across Search Tasks , 2001 .

[46]  S. Shettleworth Cognition, evolution, and behavior , 1998 .

[47]  Aaron P Blaisdell,et al.  Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[48]  F. Restle Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question. , 1957, Psychological review.

[49]  John Moore,et al.  Kamin blocking , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[50]  B. Campbell,et al.  Punishment and aversive behavior , 1969 .

[51]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[52]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Spontaneous alternation behavior. , 1958, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  D. J. Olson,et al.  Characteristics of spatial memory in pigeons. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[54]  Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning , 1996 .

[55]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Landmark use by pigeons in a touch-screen spatial search task , 1992 .

[56]  Kenneth J Leising,et al.  Temporal integration in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in rats , 2007, Learning & behavior.

[57]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[58]  K Cheng,et al.  Stimulus control in the use of landmarks by pigeons in a touch-screen task. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[59]  Peter C. Holland,et al.  Acquisition of Representation-Mediated Conditioned Food Aversions. , 1981 .

[60]  John B. Watson,et al.  Orientation in the white rat , 1908 .

[61]  L. H. Hicks Effects of Overtraining on Acquisition and Reversal of Place and Response Learning , 1964 .

[62]  Alan C Kamil,et al.  Tests for cognitive mapping in Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2001, Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[63]  H. Terrace,et al.  Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory , 1980 .

[64]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Spatial memory in pigeons on the radial maze. , 1985 .

[65]  B. Ritchie,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place performance and the acquisition of place dispositions. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[66]  N. J. Mackintosh,et al.  Blocking and Overshadowing between Intra-Maze and Extra-Maze Cues: A Test of the Independence of Locale and Guidance Learning , 1985 .

[67]  Victoria D. Chamizo,et al.  Blocking and unblocking in a navigation task , 2005 .

[68]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[69]  A. Black,et al.  Stimulus control of spatial behavior on the eight-arm maze in rats ☆ ☆☆ , 1980 .

[70]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Computations on metric maps in mammals: getting oriented and choosing a multi-destination route. , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[71]  K. Bättig,et al.  Effects of nicotine on the exploratory locomotion patterns of female Roman high- and low-avoidance rats , 1976, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[72]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Time, rate, and conditioning. , 2000, Psychological review.

[73]  J. B. Calhoun The ecology and sociology of the Norway rat. , 1963 .

[74]  B. Poucet Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. , 1993, Psychological review.

[75]  SIMON BENHAMOU,et al.  No evidence for cognitive mapping in rats , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  L. Kamin Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning , 1967 .

[77]  Aaron P. Blaisdell,et al.  Integration of spatial maps in pigeons , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[78]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Reminder-induced recovery of associations to an overshadowed stimulus , 1982 .

[79]  Lucia F Jacobs,et al.  Unpacking the cognitive map: the parallel map theory of hippocampal function. , 2003, Psychological review.

[80]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Within Compound Associations Mediate the Retrospective Revaluation of Causality Judgements , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[81]  P. Holland Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action , 1990, Cognition.

[82]  Victoria D. Chamizo,et al.  Spatial Learning: Conditions and Basic Effects , 2002 .

[83]  N. Burgess Spatial Cognition and the Brain , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[84]  R. Rescorla A theory of pavlovian conditioning: The effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement , 1972 .

[85]  A. Blaisdell,et al.  Unblocking with Qualitative Change of Unconditioned Stimulus , 1997 .

[86]  M. Spetch,et al.  Spatial memory in pigeons (Columba livia) in an open-field feeding environment. , 1986 .

[87]  Steven C Stout,et al.  Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis. , 2007, Psychological review.

[88]  R. Bolles,et al.  A nonassociative aspect of overshadowing , 1981 .

[89]  R. R. Miller,et al.  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: support for the comparator hypothesis. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[90]  D. Whitteridge Lectures on Conditioned Reflexes , 1942, Nature.

[91]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Temporal integration and temporal backward associations in human and nonhuman subjects , 2003, Learning & behavior.

[92]  R. Morris Spatial Localization Does Not Require the Presence of Local Cues , 1981 .

[93]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  N. Burgess,et al.  Spatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[95]  K. Cheng The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[96]  Wayne Dennis,et al.  Multiple visual discrimination in the block elevated maze. , 1932 .

[97]  Derek A. Hamilton,et al.  Blocking in human place learning: Evidence from virtual navigation , 1999, Psychobiology.

[98]  Sara J Shettleworth,et al.  An associative model of geometry learning: a modified choice rule. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[99]  Overshadowing and latent inhibition counteract each other: Support for the comparator hypothesis. , 1998 .

[100]  Aaron P Blaisdell,et al.  The S-R information stream: Where’s the filter? , 2003, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[101]  M L Spetch,et al.  Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[102]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Learning about Environmental Geometry: an Associative Model , 2022 .

[103]  J. D. McGaugh,et al.  Inactivation of Hippocampus or Caudate Nucleus with Lidocaine Differentially Affects Expression of Place and Response Learning , 1996, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[104]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[105]  H. Blodgett,et al.  Relative strength of place and response learning in the T maze. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[106]  Jerome S. Cohen,et al.  Spatial configuration and list learning of proximally cued arms by rats in the enclosed four-arm radial maze , 2005, Learning & behavior.

[107]  R. Morris,et al.  Allocentric Spatial Learning by Hippocampectomised Rats: A Further Test of the “Spatial Mapping” and “Working Memory” Theories of Hippocampal Function , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[108]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Small-scale spatial cognition in pigeons , 2006, Behavioural Processes.

[109]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[110]  E. Tolman,et al.  Studies in spatial learning; place learning versus response learning. , 1946, Journal of experimental psychology.

[111]  V. D. Chamizo,et al.  Spatial integration with rats , 2006, Learning & behavior.

[112]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Whither geometry? Troubles of the geometric module , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[113]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations, the hippocampus, and contextual fear conditioning , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[114]  V. D. Chamizo Acquisition of Knowledge about Spatial Location: Assessing the Generality of the Mechanism of Learning , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[115]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Pigeons′ Use of Landmarks Presented in Digitized Images , 1994 .

[116]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[117]  J. A. Gengerelli Preliminary experiments on the causal factors in animal learning. , 1928 .