Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research

Family‐based research is essential to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of human disease. The success of family‐based research often depends on investigators' ability to identify, recruit, and achieve a high participation rate among eligible family members. However, recruitment of family members raises ethical concerns due to the tension between protecting participants' privacy and promoting research quality, and guidelines for these activities are not well established. The Cancer Genetics Network Bioethics Committee assembled a multidisciplinary group to explore the scientific and ethical issues that arise in the process of family‐based recruitment. The group used a literature review as well as expert opinion to develop recommendations about appropriate approaches to identifying, contacting, and recruiting family members. We conclude that there is no single correct approach, but recommend a balanced approach that takes into account the nature of the particular study as well as its recruitment goals. Recruitment of family members should be viewed as part of the research protocol and should require appropriate informed consent of the already‐enrolled participant. Investigators should inform prospective participants why they are being contacted, how information about them was obtained, and what will happen to that information if they decide not to participate. The recruitment process should also be sensitive to the fact that some individuals from families at increased genetic risk will have no prior knowledge of their risk status. These recommendations are put forward to promote further discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to family‐based recruitment. They suggest a framework for considering alternative recruitment strategies and their implications, as well as highlight areas in need of further empirical research. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  B. Rimer,et al.  Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial: Who participates? Who declines? , 1996, Cancer.

[2]  N. Risch Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium , 2000, Nature.

[3]  S. Winceslaus,et al.  New strategies for increasing the detection of HIV: analysis of routine data , 2003, British medical journal.

[4]  C. Lidz,et al.  Familial coercion to participate in genetic family studies: is there cause for IRB intervention? , 1994, IRB.

[5]  R. Millikan,et al.  Making epidemiologic studies responsive to the needs of participants and communities: The Carolina Breast Cancer Study experience , 2002, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[6]  M. Cotterchio,et al.  A qualitative study of subject recruitment for familial cancer research. , 2001, Annals of epidemiology.

[7]  M Gwinn,et al.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics. , 2001, JAMA.

[8]  L. Kuller,et al.  Family studies: The key to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of chronic disease? , 1988, Genetic epidemiology.

[9]  J. R. Alexander,et al.  Ethical Issues in Genetic Linkage Studies of Psychiatric Disorders , 1992, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[10]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Participation of minorities in cancer research: the influence of structural, cultural, and linguistic factors. , 2000, Annals of epidemiology.

[11]  H Brody,et al.  Transparency: informed consent in primary care. , 1989, The Hastings Center report.

[12]  George J Annas,et al.  Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Genomic medicine--a primer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Meschia,et al.  Ethical and Methodological Issues in Pedigree Stroke Research , 2001, Stroke.

[15]  J. Botkin,et al.  Protecting the privacy of family members in survey and pedigree research. , 2001, JAMA.

[16]  K. Bonvicini The art of recruitment: the foundation of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness. , 1998, Family process.

[17]  D. Bowen,et al.  Predictors of participation in genetic research in a primary care physician network. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[18]  J. Sorenson,et al.  Communication about carrier testing within hemophilia A families , 2003, American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics.

[19]  A. Glass,et al.  Mailing strategies and costs of recruiting heavy smokers in CARET, a large chemoprevention trial. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[20]  B. Devellis,et al.  Proband and parent assistance in identifying relatives for cystic fibrosis carrier testing. , 1996, American journal of medical genetics.

[21]  A. Teich,et al.  Ethical and legal issues in pedigree research , 1993 .

[22]  J. E. Nash,et al.  A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  M. W. Foster,et al.  The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  J. Kulynych,et al.  The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  ASHG report. Statement on informed consent for genetic research. The American Society of Human Genetics. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  D. Seminara,et al.  Participation in the cooperative family registry for breast cancer studies: issues of informed consent. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  T. Sellers,et al.  Notification of a family history of breast cancer: issues of privacy and confidentiality. , 1996, American journal of medical genetics.

[28]  N. Morton Genetic epidemiology , 1997, International Journal of Obesity.

[29]  P. Colley,et al.  Cascade testing for carrier status in cystic fibrosis in a large family , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[30]  W. McCaskill-Stevens,et al.  Participation of Minorities in Cancer Research , 2000 .