MCM6 is a critical transcriptional target of YAP to promote gastric tumorigenesis and serves as a therapeutic target

Rationale: Hyperactivation of Hippo-Yes-associated protein (YAP) signaling pathway governs tumorigenesis of gastric cancer (GC). Here we reveal that minichromosome maintenance complex component 6 (MCM6) is a critical transcriptional target of YAP in GC. We aim to investigate the function, mechanism of action, and clinical implication of MCM6 in GC. Methods: The downstream targets of YAP were screened by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray, and further validated by chromatin immunoprecipitation PCR and luciferase reporter assays. The clinical implication of MCM6 was assessed in multiple GC cohorts. Biological function of MCM6 was evaluated in vitro, in patient-derived organoids, and in vivo. RNA-seq was performed to unravel downstream signaling of MCM6. Potential MCM6 inhibitor was identified and the effect of MCM6 inhibition on GC growth was evaluated. Results: Integrative RNA sequencing and microarray analyses revealed MCM6 as a potential YAP downstream target in GC. The YAP-TEAD complex bound to the promoter of MCM6 to induce its transcription. Increased MCM6 expression was commonly observed in human GC tissues and predicted poor patients survival. MCM6 knockdown suppressed proliferation and migration of GC cells and patient-derived organoids, and attenuated xenograft growth and peritoneal metastasis in mice. Mechanistically, MCM6 activated PI3K/Akt/GSK3β signaling to support YAP-potentiated gastric tumorigenicity and metastasis. Furthermore, MCM6 deficiency sensitized GC cells to chemo- or radiotherapy by causing DNA breaks and blocking ATR/Chk1-mediated DNA damage response (DDR), leading to exacerbated cell death and tumor regression. As there are no available MCM6 inhibitors, we performed high-throughput virtual screening and identified purpureaside C as a novel MCM6 inhibitor. Purpureaside C not only suppressed GC growth but also synergized with 5-fluorouracil to induce cell death. Conclusions: Hyperactivated YAP in GC induces MCM6 transcription via binding to its promoter. YAP-MCM6 axis facilitates GC progression by inducing PI3K/Akt signaling. Targeting MCM6 suppresses GC growth and sensitizes GC cells to genotoxic agents by modulating ATR/Chk1-dependent DDR, providing a promising strategy for GC treatment.

[1]  Xiaotian Zhang,et al.  Plasma extracellular vesicle derived protein profile predicting and monitoring immunotherapeutic outcomes of gastric cancer , 2022, Journal of extracellular vesicles.

[2]  Duan Ma,et al.  USP7 promotes hepatoblastoma progression through activation PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. , 2021, Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  Xiaoxiao Hu,et al.  MCM6 indicates adverse tumor features and poor outcomes and promotes G1/S cell cycle progression in neuroblastoma , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[5]  Jun Yu,et al.  MCM family in gastrointestinal cancer and other malignancies: From functional characterization to clinical implication. , 2020, Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer.

[6]  Hongchun Liu,et al.  Minichromosome maintenance 6 complex component identified by bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2020, Oncology reports.

[7]  A. Safina,et al.  Histone chaperone FACT is essential to overcome replication stress in mammalian cells , 2020, Oncogene.

[8]  Zengqiang Yuan,et al.  Selective Inhibition of STRN3-Containing PP2A Phosphatase Restores Hippo Tumor-Suppressor Activity in Gastric Cancer. , 2020, Cancer cell.

[9]  Xuyang Chen,et al.  SSRP1 influences colorectal cancer cell growth and apoptosis via the AKT pathway , 2019, International journal of medical sciences.

[10]  L. Gaboury,et al.  MCM2, MCM4, and MCM6 in Breast Cancer: Clinical Utility in Diagnosis and Prognosis12 , 2019, Neoplasia.

[11]  Chang-ming Huang,et al.  CDK5RAP3 Inhibits the Translocation of MCM6 to Influence the Prognosis in Gastric Cancer , 2019, Journal of Cancer.

[12]  Jun Yu,et al.  APLN promotes hepatocellular carcinoma through activating PI3K/Akt pathway and is a druggable target , 2019, Theranostics.

[13]  B. Sipos,et al.  Prognostic relevance of topoisomerase II α and minichromosome maintenance protein 6 expression in colorectal cancer , 2019, BMC Cancer.

[14]  A. Dey,et al.  Hippo Pathway in Cancer: Aberrant Regulation and Therapeutic Opportunities. , 2019, Trends in cancer.

[15]  W. Lu,et al.  Epithelial-Mesenchymal Plasticity in Cancer Progression and Metastasis. , 2019, Developmental cell.

[16]  Chunling Yi,et al.  YAP/TAZ Signaling and Resistance to Cancer Therapy. , 2019, Trends in cancer.

[17]  Zhaocai Zhou,et al.  Targeting IRF3 as a YAP agonist therapy against gastric cancer , 2018, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[18]  R. Luo,et al.  MCM6 promotes metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via MEK/ERK pathway and serves as a novel serum biomarker for early recurrence , 2018, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[19]  K. Guan,et al.  Regulation of the Hippo Pathway Transcription Factor TEAD. , 2017, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  D. Lim,et al.  YAP/TAZ regulates sprouting angiogenesis and vascular barrier maturation. , 2017, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[21]  Stefano Piccolo,et al.  YAP/TAZ at the Roots of Cancer. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[22]  C. Ruhrberg,et al.  NRP1 Regulates CDC42 Activation to Promote Filopodia Formation in Endothelial Tip Cells , 2015, Cell reports.

[23]  Graham Ball,et al.  Untangling the ATR‐CHEK1 network for prognostication, prediction and therapeutic target validation in breast cancer , 2015, Molecular oncology.

[24]  Hans Clevers,et al.  Long-Term Culture of Genome-Stable Bipotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Liver , 2015, Cell.

[25]  V. Smits,et al.  USP7 controls Chk1 protein stability by direct deubiquitination , 2014, Cell cycle.

[26]  Shan Jiang,et al.  Yap1 Activation Enables Bypass of Oncogenic Kras Addiction in Pancreatic Cancer , 2014, Cell.

[27]  H. Ji,et al.  A peptide mimicking VGLL4 function acts as a YAP antagonist therapy against gastric cancer. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[28]  P. Nordlund,et al.  Monitoring Drug Target Engagement in Cells and Tissues Using the Cellular Thermal Shift Assay , 2013, Science.

[29]  David M. Thomas,et al.  The Hippo pathway and human cancer , 2013, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  Jun Du,et al.  PI3K/Akt-dependent phosphorylation of GSK3β and activation of RhoA regulate Wnt5a-induced gastric cancer cell migration. , 2013, Cellular signalling.

[31]  Y. Kitagawa,et al.  Gastric Cancer: Current Status of Diagnosis and Treatment , 2013, Cancers.

[32]  F. Camargo,et al.  YAP mediates crosstalk between the Hippo and PI(3)K–TOR pathways by suppressing PTEN via miR-29 , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  Hui-Kuan Lin,et al.  Activation of Ras/PI3K/ERK pathway induces c-Myc stabilization to upregulate argininosuccinate synthetase, leading to arginine deiminase resistance in melanoma cells. , 2012, Cancer research.

[34]  S. Jackson,et al.  Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. , 2011, Genes & development.

[35]  Jun Yu,et al.  Yes-Associated Protein 1 Exhibits Oncogenic Property in Gastric Cancer and Its Nuclear Accumulation Associates with Poor Prognosis , 2011, Clinical Cancer Research.

[36]  T. Chou Drug combination studies and their synergy quantification using the Chou-Talalay method. , 2010, Cancer research.

[37]  Lye Mun Tho,et al.  The ATM-Chk2 and ATR-Chk1 pathways in DNA damage signaling and cancer. , 2010, Advances in cancer research.

[38]  L. Machesky Lamellipodia and filopodia in metastasis and invasion , 2008, FEBS letters.

[39]  Thomas Helleday,et al.  DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[40]  J Wade Harper,et al.  The DNA damage response: ten years after. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[41]  F. Bunz,et al.  Loss of ataxia telangiectasia mutated– and Rad3-related function potentiates the effects of chemotherapeutic drugs on cancer cell survival , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[42]  S. Ficarro,et al.  Essential role of phosphorylation of MCM2 by Cdc7/Dbf4 in the initiation of DNA replication in mammalian cells. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[43]  Ting-Chao Chou,et al.  Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies , 2006, Pharmacological Reviews.

[44]  H. Kiyokawa,et al.  Akt induces beta-cell proliferation by regulating cyclin D1, cyclin D2, and p21 levels and cyclin-dependent kinase-4 activity. , 2006, Diabetes.

[45]  J. Testa,et al.  AKT signaling in normal and malignant cells , 2005, Oncogene.

[46]  W. Klapper,et al.  Minichromosome maintenance protein 6, a proliferation marker superior to Ki-67 and independent predictor of survival in patients with mantle cell lymphoma , 2005, British Journal of Cancer.

[47]  C. Sugimoto,et al.  PI3K/Akt and apoptosis: size matters , 2003, Oncogene.

[48]  L. Cantley,et al.  Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[49]  P. Johnston,et al.  5-Fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[50]  Honglin Zhou,et al.  Akt Regulates Cell Survival and Apoptosis at a Postmitochondrial Level , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[51]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Akt Promotes Cell Survival by Phosphorylating and Inhibiting a Forkhead Transcription Factor , 1999, Cell.

[52]  B. Tye MCM proteins in DNA replication. , 1999, Annual review of biochemistry.

[53]  M. Roussel,et al.  Glycogen synthase kinase-3beta regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. , 1998, Genes & development.

[54]  C. Widmann,et al.  Caspase-dependent Cleavage of Signaling Proteins during Apoptosis , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  C. Nobes,et al.  Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia , 1995, Cell.