Roughness perception in tactile channels: Evidence for an opponent process in the sense of touch

Abstract Magnitude estimates of the tactile roughness of raised-dot surfaces revealed that perceived overall roughness, defined as the combination of the perceived roughness of the dot pattern and the perceived roughness of the individual dots in the pattern, is an inverted U-shaped function of dot spacing, reaching a maximum at approximately 3.0 mm of dot separation. The hypothesis that Pacinian corpuscles are involved in roughness perception has been supported by the finding that selective adaptation of the Pacinian corpuscle (PC) channel with a 250-Hz stimulus at 20-dB SL results in a decrease in the perceived overall roughness of the raised-dot surface at the fingertip. The effect of PC channel adaptation on perceived overall roughness was attributable entirely to a reduction in the perceived roughness of the individual raised dots; PC adaptation had no effect on the perceived roughness of the raised-dot pattern. Selective adaptation of the slowly adapting type I (SA I) channel with a 5-Hz stimulus at 20-dB SL had the opposite effect of PC channel adaptation and resulted in an increase in the perceived roughness of the individual raised dots, and consequently the perceived overall roughness of the raised-dot surface. As was the case with PC channel adaptation, SA I channel adaptation had no effect on the perceived roughness of the pattern. Adaptation with a compound adapting stimulus containing 5- and 250-Hz components at 20-dB SL had no effect on perceived overall roughness, which suggests that the PC and SA I channels operate antagonistically in an opponent-process fashion in the perception of the microstructure of a textured surface. Neither PC adaptation nor SA I adaptation affected perceived pattern roughness, which suggests that pattern roughness is coded by relative rather than by absolute spatial variation in firing rate.

[1]  John H. Wright,et al.  Information-Processing Channels in the Tactile Sensory System: A Psychophysical and Physiological Analysis , 2008 .

[2]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. , 1977, Sensory processes.

[3]  Roland S. Johansson,et al.  Tactile Afferent Units with Small and Well Demarcated Receptive Fields in the Glabrous Skin Area of the Human Hand , 1979 .

[4]  J. F. Dammann,et al.  The Neural Coding of Stimulus Intensity: Linking the Population Response of Mechanoreceptive Afferents with Psychophysical Behavior , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M. Hollins,et al.  Somatosensory Coding of Roughness: The Effect of Texture Adaptation in Direct and Indirect Touch , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  A. A. Collins,et al.  The localization of low- and high-frequency vibrotactile stimuli. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  C. H. Rogers Choice of Stimulator Frequency for Tactile Arrays , 1970 .

[9]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation impairs discrimination of fine, but not coarse, textures. , 2001, Somatosensory & motor research.

[10]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Enhancement and summation in the perception of two successive vibrotactile stimuli , 1975 .

[11]  M. Hollins,et al.  The vibrations of texture , 2003, Somatosensory & motor research.

[12]  Verrillo Rt,et al.  Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. , 1977 .

[13]  D. Jameson,et al.  An opponent-process theory of color vision. , 1957, Psychological review.

[14]  S J Bolanowski,et al.  Temperature and criterion effects in a somatosensory subsystem: a neurophysiological and psychophysical study. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Tactual form and Texture Perception , 1992 .

[16]  James C Craig,et al.  Convergence of submodality-specific input onto neurons in primary somatosensory cortex. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  On the Effect of Practice and Motivation on the Threshold of Audibility , 1958 .

[18]  Li Min Chen,et al.  Modality maps within primate somatosensory cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Lederman,et al.  The role of vibration in the tactual perception of roughness , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Vibrotactile temporal summation for threshold and suprathreshold levels of stimulation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Hollins,et al.  Imposed Vibration Influences Perceived Tactile Smoothness , 2000, Perception.

[23]  R. Erickson,et al.  The Across-Fiber Pattern Theory: An Organizing Principle for Molar Neural Function , 1982 .

[24]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Tactile Functions of Mechanoreceptive Afferents Innervating the Hand , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[25]  M. Hollins,et al.  Evidence for the duplex theory of tactile texture perception , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[27]  K. Sathian,et al.  Temporal Cues Contribute to Tactile Perception of Roughness , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  M. Hollins,et al.  Perceived intensity of vibrotactile stimuli: the role of mechanoreceptive channels. , 1996, Somatosensory & motor research.

[30]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Neural Coding Mechanisms in Tactile Pattern Recognition: The Relative Contributions of Slowly and Rapidly Adapting Mechanoreceptors to Perceived Roughness , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Jason C. Cohen,et al.  Under which conditions do the skin and probe decouple during sinusoidal vibrations? , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  C. Connor,et al.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  L E Marks,et al.  Summation of vibrotactile intensity: an analog to auditory critical bands? , 1979, Sensory processes.

[35]  C. Davis Touch , 1997, The Lancet.

[36]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Perception of the tactile texture of raised-dot patterns: A multidimensional analysis , 2005, Somatosensory & motor research.

[37]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds. , 1979, Sensory processes.