Quantifying the spatial properties of forest canopy gaps using LiDAR imagery and GIS

The spatial properties of gaps have an important influence upon the regeneration dynamics and species composition of forests. However, such properties can be difficult to quantify over large spatial areas using field measurements. This research considers how we conceptualize and define forest canopy gaps from a remote sensing point of view and highlights the inadequacies of passive optical remotely sensed data for delineating gaps. The study employs the analytical functions of a geographical information system to extract gap spatial characteristics from imagery acquired by an active remote sensing device, an airborne light detection and ranging instrument (LiDAR). These techniques were applied to an area of semi-natural broadleaved deciduous forest, in order to map gap size, shape complexity, vegetation height diversity and gap connectivity. A vegetation cover map derived from imagery from an airborne multispectral scanner was used in combination with the LiDAR data to characterize the dominant vegetation types within gaps. Although the quantification of these gap characteristics alone is insufficient to provide conclusive evidence on specific processes, the paper demonstrates how such information can be indicative of the general status of a forest and can provide new perspectives and possibilities or further ecological research and forest monitoring activities.

[1]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Tree Death as an Ecological Process , 1987 .

[2]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Seasonal variations in the spectral reflectance of deciduous tree canopies , 1995 .

[3]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Measurement of the spectral directional reflectance of forest canopies: A review of methods and a practical application , 1994 .

[4]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Filling the gaps: remote sensing meets woodland ecology , 1996 .

[5]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[6]  K. Woods.  Patterns of tree replacement: canopy effects on understory pattern in hemlock-northern hardwood forests , 1984, Vegetatio.

[7]  Antti Penttinen,et al.  Statistical opportunities for comparing stand structural heterogeneity in managed and primeval forests: An example from boreal spruce forest in southern Finland , 1996 .

[8]  F. Putz.  Treefall Pits and Mounds, Buried Seeds, and the Importance of Soil Disturbance to Pioneer Trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama , 1983 .

[9]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[10]  S. W. Beatty.  Influence of Microtopography and Canopy Species on Spatial Patterns of Forest Understory Plants , 1984 .

[11]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[12]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[13]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas , 1999 .

[14]  N. Brokaw.  Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. , 1985 .

[15]  E. J. Huising,et al.  Errors and accuracy estimates of laser data acquired by various laser scanning systems for topographic applications , 1998 .

[16]  J. Denslow.  Chapter 17 – Disturbance-Mediated Coexistence of Species , 1985 .

[17]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  Airborne laser scanning: existing systems and firms and other resources , 1999 .

[18]  Håkan Hytteborn,et al.  Gap structure, disturbance and regeneration in a primeval Picea abies forest , 1991 .

[19]  C. G. Bachman.  Laser radar systems and techniques , 1979 .

[20]  N. Flower.  An historical and ecological study of inclosed and uninclosed woods in the New Forest, Hampshire , 1977 .

[21]  John A. Kupfer,et al.  Early gap successional pathways in a Fagus‐Acer forest preserve: pattern and determinants , 1996 .

[22]  M. Swaine,et al.  Germination and Growth of Colonizing Species in Artificial Gaps of Different Sizes in Dipterocarp Rain Forest , 1992 .

[23]  A. Jelalian.  Laser radar systems , 1980 .

[24]  L. M Gomes Pereira,et al.  Suitability of laser data for DTM generation: a case study in the context of road planning and design , 1999 .

[25]  David E. Hibbs,et al.  A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. , 2000 .

[26]  J. Connell.  Some Processes Affecting the Species Composition in Forest Gaps , 1989 .

[27]  G. F. Peterken,et al.  Natural Woodland: Ecology and Conservation in Northern Temperate Regions. , 1996 .

[28]  N. Brokaw.  Gap-Phase Regeneration of Three Pioneer Tree Species in a Tropical Forest , 1987 .

[29]  F. Bazzaz.  Dynamics of Wet Tropical Forests and Their Species Strategies , 1984 .

[30]  D. A. Ratcliffe,et al.  British Plant Communities, Volume 1: Woodlands and Scrub , 1998 .

[31]  Lawerence S. Barden.  Repeatability in Forest Gap Research: Studies in the Great Smoky Mountains , 1989 .

[32]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Characterising windthrown gaps from fine spatial resolution remotely sensed data , 2000 .

[33]  N. Brokaw,et al.  The definition of treefall gap and its effect on measures of forest dynamics. , 1982 .

[34]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Forests are Not Just Swiss Cheese: Canopy Stereogeometry of Non‐Gaps in Tropical Forests , 1989 .

[35]  W. Platt,et al.  Gap Light Regimes Influence Canopy Tree Diversity , 1989 .

[36]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Introducing New Indices for Accuracy Evaluation of Classified Images Representing Semi-Natural Woodland Environments. , 2001 .

[37]  T. Kuuluvainen.  Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration dynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Filand: a review , 1994 .

[38]  F. Bongers,et al.  Pioneer species distribution in treefall gaps in Neotropical rain forest; a gap definition and its consequences , 1988, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[39]  H. Wiegand.  Pielou, E. C. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley Interscience. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1969. VIII + 286 S., 32 Abb., Preis 140 s , 1971 .

[40]  A. Newton,et al.  The influence of canopy gap size on natural regeneration of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) in Bolivia. , 2000 .

[41]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Communication , 1950 .

[42]  E. C. Pielou.  An introduction to mathematical ecology , 1970 .

[43]  T. Whitmore.  Gap Size and Species Richness in Tropical Rain Forests , 1984 .

[44]  N. Brokaw,et al.  Chapter 4 – Treefalls, Regrowth, and Community Structure in Tropical Forests , 1985 .

[45]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  An ecological survey of deciduous woodlands using airborne remote sensing and geographical information systems (GIS). , 1997 .

[46]  R. Tripathi,et al.  Microenvironmental variability and species diversity in treefall gaps in a sub-tropical broadleaved forest , 1992, Vegetatio.

[47]  Alan P. Covich,et al.  Analyzing Shapes of Foraging Areas: Some Ecological and Economic Theories , 1976 .

[48]  T. C. Whitmore,et al.  Canopy Gaps and the Two Major Groups of Forest Trees , 1989 .

[49]  A. Dolling,et al.  The vegetative spread of Pteridium aquilinum in a hemiboreal forest – invasion or revegetation? , 1999 .

[50]  James R. Runkle,et al.  PATTERNS OF DISTURBANCE IN SOME OLD-GROWTH MESIC FORESTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' , 1982 .

[51]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Gap Characteristics and Vegetation Response in Coniferous Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1989 .