An investigation on the efficacy of classical tuning algorithm to satisfy advanced requirements: control of main steam pressure during fuel switching and load disturbances in coal fired boilers

Abstract The direct application of classical tuning methods in determining the PID controller parameters warrants the determination of the intercept values in X-axis (designated as “L”) and Y-axis (designated as “a”) from the open loop step response of the output (to be controlled) with respect to input signal (to be regulated). However, for complex processes, the above procedure seemed to be cumbersome and as an alternative step the researchers usually opted for the heuristic algorithms for the determination of PID controller parameters. In this paper, the authors have identified the boiler demand signal as the input signal to be regulated to control the steam pressure of utility steam generators and derived the PID controller parameters using classical tuning algorithms. Further, it has been demonstrated that with the use of these controller parameters, the transient responses obtained during fuel switching as well as load disturbances are much better than the earlier published results.

[1]  B. W. Hogg,et al.  Application of multivariable generalised predictive control to a boiler system , 1991 .

[2]  C. M. Cheng,et al.  Fuzzy Model Based Control of Steam Generation in Drum-Boiler Power Plant , 1997 .

[3]  K. Åström,et al.  Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control , 2004 .

[4]  Jingcheng Wang,et al.  Sliding Mode Predictive Control of Main Steam Pressure in Coal-fired Power Plant Boiler , 2012 .

[5]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Application of Model Reference Adaptive Algorithm to Combustion Control of a Power Unit Boiler , 1985, 1985 American Control Conference.

[6]  Tianyou Chai,et al.  Control of power-plant main steam pressure and power output based on fuzzy reasoning and auto-tuning , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2003. FUZZ '03..

[7]  Tore Hägglund,et al.  The future of PID control , 2000 .

[8]  Sun Demin,et al.  The stair-like generalized predictive control for main-steam pressure of boiler in steam-power plant , 2000, Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.00EX393).

[9]  Wang Zai-ying,et al.  Application of boiler superheated steam pressure control which based on IMC-PID , 2015, The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC).

[10]  Mangalanathan Umapathy,et al.  Improved method to mitigate the effect of coal fuel switching on critical process parameters of a steam generator in a thermal power plant , 2011 .

[11]  Yang Yong,et al.  Coordination Optimization-based Variable Structure Control for Main Steam Pressure of Power Plant , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.

[12]  Li Chao,et al.  Research on the main steam pressure control system of boilers based on fuzzy PI control , 2011, Proceedings of 2011 6th International Forum on Strategic Technology.

[13]  Mohammad Taghi Hamidi Beheshti,et al.  A new hybrid boiler master controller , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference (IEEE Cat. No.CH37301).

[14]  Tianyou Chai,et al.  Intelligent control of power-plant main steam pressure and power output , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[15]  Girijesh Prasad,et al.  A neural net model-based multivariable long-range predictive control strategy applied in thermal power plant control , 1997 .