A new approach for the anti-swing control of overhead cranes with high-speed load hoisting

The objective of this study is to design a new anti-swing control scheme for overhead cranes, the performance of which equals or possibly surpasses the performance of a skilled crane operator. In this study, the anti-swing control problem is solved as a trajectory-tracking control problem. An anti-swing trajectory control scheme is designed based on the Lyapunov stability theorem, and then extended to an adaptive scheme to cope with parametric uncertainties, in which sufficient damping of load swing is achieved by modifying the reference trajectory of the trolley. The proposed control consists of a feed forward control and a non-linear PID control with gravity compensation, which guarantees asymptotic stability while keeping all internal signals bounded. The proposed control, allowing high-speed load hoisting, also guarantees accurate control of trolley position and rope length with optimum damping. In summary, the proposed control realizes a typical crane operation in practice, maintains its control performance in the presence of parametric uncertainties, and has a simple structure for easy implementation and gain tuning. The performance of the proposed control is shown with computer simulations.

[1]  Warren E. Dixon,et al.  Nonlinear coupling control laws for an overhead crane system , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (CCA'01) (Cat. No.01CH37204).

[2]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Nonlinear feedback control of a gantry crane , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[3]  B. d'Andrea-Novel,et al.  Adaptive control of a class of mechanical systems using linearization and Lyapunov methods: a comparative study on the overhead crane example , 1991, [1991] Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Kazunobu Yoshida Nonlinear controller design for a crane system with state constraints , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207).

[5]  William Singhose,et al.  Effects of hoisting on the input shaping control of gantry cranes , 2000 .

[6]  Tsutomu Mita,et al.  Optimal Control of the Crane System Using the Maximum Speed of the Trolley , 1979 .

[7]  Ho-Hoon Lee A Path-Planning Strategy for Overhead Cranes With High Hoisting Speed , 2002 .

[8]  Petros A. Ioannou Robust adaptive controller with zero residual tracking errors , 1986, 1985 24th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Ho-Hoon Lee,et al.  A New Anti-Swing Control of Overhead Cranes , 1997 .

[10]  M. Uesugi,et al.  Automatic Control of an Overhead Crane , 1981 .

[11]  J. Levine,et al.  Global stability without motion planning may be worse than local tracking , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).

[12]  이호진,et al.  제한된 외란하에서의 강인한 이산 시간 모델 추종 적응 제어 ( A Robust Discrete-Time Model Reference Adaptive Control in the Presence of Bounded Disturbances ) , 1988 .

[13]  Aj Ridout New Feedback Control System for Overhead Cranes , 1987 .

[14]  Rogelio Lozano,et al.  Control of convey-crane based on passivity , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.00CH36334).

[15]  Brigitte d'Andréa-Novel,et al.  Adaptive control of an overhead crane using dynamic feedback linearization and estimation design , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.