Smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design using NiTi rotary instruments.

AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a smooth flexible versus active tapered shaft design on canal preparation by NiTi rotary techniques. METHODOLOGY A XMCT-scanner (SkyScan 1072) and developed software (Bergmans et al. 2001) were used to nondestructively analyze the mesial canals of 10 extracted mandibular molars in 3D with a spatial resolution of 30 microm. Specimens (n = 10 per group) were scanned before (PRE) and after (POST) preparation using Lightspeed (smooth flexible) or GT-rotary (active tapered) files. Numerical values for volumes, dentine removal (net) transportation and centring ability were obtained in addition to a visual inspection on canal aberrations. Data were analyzed by Shapiro Wilk test, multiway factorial anova, Tukey-Kramer test, Wilcoxon test and t-test. RESULTS Results indicated that the active tapered shaft removed significantly more dentine in the middle to apical portion of the root compared to the smooth flexible design. Both groups demonstrated some straightening, but no significant differences were found with respect to instrument types. However, absolute values for net transportation and centering ratio were small and no canal aberrations could be found. CONCLUSIONS The smooth flexible shaft design did not improve the morphological characteristics of canal preparation by NiTi rotary instruments when compared with the active tapered design. Therefore, system selection should be based upon other criteria.

[1]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1. , 1997, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  S. Montgomery,et al.  The effects of Canal Master, Flex-R, and K-Flex instrumentation on root canal configuration. , 1991, Journal of Endodontics.

[3]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Three-dimensional Analysis of Root Canal Geometry by High-resolution Computed Tomography , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[4]  S B Dove,et al.  A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  W. L. Wildey,et al.  A new root canal instrument and instrumentation technique: a preliminary report. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[6]  L. Fava.  The double-flared technique: an alternative for biomechanical preparation. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[7]  H. Gerstein,et al.  Use of a hemostatic agent in the repair of procedural errors. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of mity roto 360° and naviflex rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals , 1998 .

[9]  J. Gutmann,et al.  Perspectives on periradicular healing using Sealapex: a case report. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[10]  S. Montgomery.  Root canal wall thickness of mandibular molars after biomechanical preparation. , 1985, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  O A Peters,et al.  Effects of four Ni-Ti preparation techniques on root canal geometry assessed by micro computed tomography. , 2001, International endodontic journal.

[12]  C. Stock,et al.  The risk of perforation in the curved canal: anticurvature filing compared with the stepback technique. , 1987, International endodontic journal.

[13]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  D. Clement,et al.  Morphometric video analysis of the engine-driven nickel-titanium Lightspeed instrument system. , 1996, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  S A Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. , 2000, International endodontic journal.

[16]  H. Gerstein,et al.  An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. , 1988, Journal of endodontics.

[17]  S. A. Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of NT Engine and McXim rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 2. , 1997, International endodontic journal.

[18]  S A Thompson,et al.  Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2. , 2002, International endodontic journal.

[19]  L Bergmans,et al.  A methodology for quantitative evaluation of root canal instrumentation using microcomputed tomography. , 2001, International endodontic journal.