A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system.

In breast tomosynthesis there is a compromise between resolution, noise, and acquisition speed for a given glandular dose. The purpose of the present work is to develop a simulation platform to investigate the potential imaging performance for the many possible tomosynthesis system configurations. The simulation platform was used to investigate the dependence of image blur and signal difference to noise ratio (SDNR) for several different tomosynthesis acquisition configurations. Simulated projections of a slanted thin tungsten wire placed in different object planes were modified according to the detector's modulation transfer function (MTF), with or without pixel binning. In addition, the focal spot blur (FSB), which depends on the location of the wire, the system geometry, the source-detector movement speed, and the exposure time, was also incorporated into the projections. Both expectation maximization (EM) and filtered back projection (FBP) based algorithms were used for 3D image reconstruction. The in-plane MTF was calculated from the reconstructed image of the wire. To evaluate the noise performance, simulated noiseless projections of calcification and tumor in uniform breast tissue were modified with the noise power spectrum (NPS) calculated from a cascaded linear system model for the detector for a given x-ray dose. The SDNR of the reconstructed images was calculated with different tomosynthesis configurations, e.g., pixel binning, view number, and angular range. Our results showed that for a source-to-imager distance (SID) of 66 cm, pixel binning (2 x 2) caused more degradation to the in-plane MTF than the blur caused by the moving focal spot and reconstruction. The in-depth resolution can be improved by increasing the angular range.

[1]  David Kaeli,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis mammography using a parallel maximum-likelihood reconstruction method , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  A method for modifying the image quality parameters of digital radiographic images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[3]  Ismail B. Tutar,et al.  Tomosynthesis-based localization of radioactive seeds in prostate brachytherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  Bo Zhao,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐39: A Computer Simulation Platform for the Optimization of Breast Tomosynthesis System , 2005 .

[6]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[8]  P. C. Johns,et al.  X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. , 1987, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[10]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[11]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems. , 1995, Medical physics.

[12]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  WE‐C‐J‐6C‐09: Cone Beam Digital Tomosynthesis (CBDT): An Alternative to Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Image‐Guided Radiation Therapy , 2005 .

[13]  R. Siddon.  Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[14]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[15]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Impulse response analysis for several digital tomosynthesis mammography reconstruction algorithms , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[16]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Optimization of operational conditions for direct digital mammography detectors for digital tomosynthesis , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  T. R. Fewell,et al.  Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  R A Schowengerdt,et al.  Modulation-transfer-function analysis for sampled image systems. , 1984, Applied optics.

[20]  J. A. Rowlands,et al.  TH‐C‐J‐6B‐10: 4D Cone Beam Digital Tomosynthesis (CBDT) and Digitally Reconstructed Tomograms (DRTs) for Improved Image Guidance of Lung Radiotherapy , 2005 .

[21]  J. Boone.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for arbitrary X-ray spectra in mammography: computer-fit values of Monte Carlo derived data. , 2002, Medical physics.

[22]  A E Burgess,et al.  The Rose model, revisited. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[23]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Adaptation of Image Quality Using Various Filter Setups in the Filtered Backprojection Approach for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2006, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[24]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  J. Ehrhardt,et al.  Modulation transfer function of the EMI CT head scanner. , 1977, Medical physics.

[26]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.

[28]  J M Boone,et al.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[29]  J. Boone,et al.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results. , 2000, Medical physics.

[30]  Tao Wu,et al.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis. , 2004, Medical physics.