Discussion on the alteration of 18F-FDG uptake by the breast according to the menstrual cycle in PET imaging
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hyun Soo Kim | Hoon-Hee Park | Ji Yun Shin | Juyoung Lee | Gye Hwan Jin | Kwang Yul Lyu | Tae Soo Lee | Juyoung Lee | G. Jin | H. S. Kim | T. Lee | J. Shin | Hoon-Hee Park | K. Y. Lyu
[1] A. Kavanagh,et al. Hormone Replacement Therapy, Percent Mammographic Density, and Sensitivity of Mammography , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.
[2] J. Lee,et al. Physiologic 18F-FDG Uptake in the Fallopian Tubes at Mid Cycle on PET/CT , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] A. Buck,et al. Whole-body PET: physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] Michael N. Maisey,et al. Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[5] B. Sanghera,et al. Serial Integrated 18F‐Fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Response in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma , 2007, The breast journal.
[6] Sang Bock Lee,et al. Inter-comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values in Korea. , 2011, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.
[7] A. Treloar,et al. Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. , 1967, International journal of fertility.
[8] Ludwig G. Strauss,et al. Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] Barton F Branstetter,et al. Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[10] K. Kerlikowske,et al. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.
[11] Ora Israel,et al. The role of FDG‐PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer , 2006, Cancer.
[12] C A Kelsey,et al. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.
[13] I. Fogelman,et al. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. , 1996, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[14] R. Wahl,et al. Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[15] R L Wahl,et al. Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[16] D. Sahani,et al. Bowel hot spots at PET-CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.