Discussion on the alteration of 18F-FDG uptake by the breast according to the menstrual cycle in PET imaging

18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful modality for identifying high-glucose-consuming cells, such as cancer cells by the glucose metabolism of FDG. FDG is taken up by cancer and inflammatory cells but occasionally, there is some FDG uptake on normal tissues as a result of their individual physiological characteristics. In particular, in fertile females, unusual FDG uptake in the breast changes according to the stages in the menstrual cycle, which can adversely affect a diagnosis. Therefore, this study examined the change in breast FDG uptake in the menstrual cycle on 18F-FDG PET/CT. One hundred and sixty females (34 ± 3.5 years old), who had not undergone a gynecologic anamnesis and had a regular menstrual cycle over the previous 6 months, were examined from March 2011 to February 2012. The subjects were divided into the following 4 groups (each with 40 patients): flow phase, proliferative phase, ovulatory phase and secretory phase using Pregnancy Calculator 0.14 and history taking. Discovery STE (GE Healthcare, USA) was used as the PET/CT. The SUVs on the accumulated region on the breast were analyzed, and 3 nuclear medicine specialists performed a blind test. The SUVs on the breast were the flow phase (1.64 ± 0.25), proliferative phase (0.93 ± 0.28), ovulatory phase (1.66 ± 0.26) and secretory phase (1.77 ± 0.28). Higher uptake values were observed in the secretory, flow phase and ovulatory phase (p<; 0.05). The accumulation of the breast was divided into the following 3 grades compared to the lung and liver by gross analysis: the breast uptake was equal to the lung (Grade I); between the lung and liver (Grade II); and equal to or greater than the liver (Grade III). These results showed a high uptake value in the secretory, flow phase and ovulatory phase (p <;0.05). In fertile females, the FDG uptake of the breast showed changes according to the menstrual cycle, which can be used to improve the diagnosis of breast disease. Therefore, the false-negative findings of breast disease can be reduced by performing an examination at the appropriate period through history taking and considering the individual menstrual cycle.

[1]  A. Kavanagh,et al.  Hormone Replacement Therapy, Percent Mammographic Density, and Sensitivity of Mammography , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[2]  J. Lee,et al.  Physiologic 18F-FDG Uptake in the Fallopian Tubes at Mid Cycle on PET/CT , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  A. Buck,et al.  Whole-body PET: physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyglucose accumulations. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Michael N. Maisey,et al.  Normal variants, artefacts and interpretative pitfalls in PET imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose and carbon-11 methionine , 1999, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  B. Sanghera,et al.  Serial Integrated 18F‐Fluorodeoxythymidine PET/CT Monitoring Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Response in Invasive Ductal Carcinoma , 2007, The breast journal.

[6]  Sang Bock Lee,et al.  Inter-comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT standardized uptake values in Korea. , 2011, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[7]  A. Treloar,et al.  Variation of the human menstrual cycle through reproductive life. , 1967, International journal of fertility.

[8]  Ludwig G. Strauss,et al.  Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Barton F Branstetter,et al.  Combined PET-CT in the head and neck: part 1. Physiologic, altered physiologic, and artifactual FDG uptake. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[11]  Ora Israel,et al.  The role of FDG‐PET/CT in suspected recurrence of breast cancer , 2006, Cancer.

[12]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  I. Fogelman,et al.  Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. , 1996, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[14]  R. Wahl,et al.  Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  R L Wahl,et al.  Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. , 1999, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[16]  D. Sahani,et al.  Bowel hot spots at PET-CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.