Elastic stiffness coefficients for an embedded spudcan in clay

Abstract The spudcan footings of mobile jack-up platforms have been known to embed several diameters during their installation in soft clay soils. During penetration soil can flow around the spudcan back filling the cavity above. This paper provides the elastic stiffness coefficients for surface to deeply embedded spudcan, as required for predicting the in situ load–displacement behaviour of a jack-up from the wind, wave and currents loading of a large storm. Results from 264 finite element analyses provide 352 dimensionless coefficients for the combined vertical, horizontal and moment elastic stiffness matrix. Coefficients are provided for (i) a representative spudcan shape, (ii) seabed with constant or linearly increasing shear modulus with depth, (iii) spudcan embedment from the surface to up to five diameters, and (iv) the limiting conditions of either an open and completely filled cavity above the spudcan. Recommendations for an interpolation procedure for partial backflow conditions are also provided. These improve the coefficients provided in existing jack-up site assessment guidelines, which do not account for spudcan shape or an increasing strength soil profile.

[1]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Assessing appropriate stiffness levels for spudcan foundations on dense sand , 2010 .

[2]  D. A. Spence,et al.  Self similar solutions to adhesive contact problems with incremental loading , 1968, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[3]  Ross Wesley Bell,et al.  The analysis of offshore foundations subjected to combined loading , 1991 .

[4]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modelling , 2001 .

[5]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading , 2002 .

[6]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay , 2011 .

[7]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Investigating six-degree-of-freedom loading of shallow foundations on sand , 2006 .

[8]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Undrained bearing capacity of deeply embedded foundations under general loading , 2011 .

[9]  Paulo Eduardo Lima de Santa Maria.  Behaviour of footings for offshore structures under combined loads , 1988 .

[10]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Determining Appropriate Stiffness Levels for Spudcan Foundations Using Jack-Up Case Records , 2002 .

[11]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Analysis of jack-up units using a Constrained NewWave methodology , 2001 .

[12]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations , 1997 .

[13]  H. Poulos,et al.  Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics , 1973 .

[14]  Mark Randolph,et al.  New Mechanism-Based Design Approach for Spudcan Foundations on Single Layer Clay , 2009 .

[15]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay , 2004 .

[16]  A. Deeks,et al.  Elastic response of circular footings embedded in a non-homogeneous half-space , 2003 .

[17]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Evaluation of long-term extreme response statistics of jack-up platforms , 2002 .

[18]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Undrained Bearing Capacity of Deeply Buried Flat Circular Footings under General Loading , 2012 .