Ultrasound- and microbubble-mediated targeted delivery of therapeutic microRNA-loaded nanocarriers to deep liver and kidney tissues in pigs

In this study, we designed and validated a platform for ultrasound (US) and microbubble (MB)-mediated delivery of FDA-approved pegylated poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles (NPs) loaded with anticancer microRNAs (miRNAs) to deep tissues in a pig model. Small RNAs have the ability to reprogram tumor cells and sensitize them to clinically used chemotherapy. However, to overcome their short intravascular circulation half-life and achieve controlled and sustained release into tumor cells, anticancer miRNAs need to be encapsulated into NPs. Moreover, focused US combined with gas-filled MBs provides a safe and noninvasive way to improve the permeability of tumor vasculature and increase the delivery efficiency of drug-loaded nanocarriers. A single handheld, curvilinear US array was used in this study for image-guidance and therapy with clinical-grade SonoVue MBs. First, we validated the platform on phantoms to optimize the MB cavitation dose based on acoustic parameters, including peak negative pressure, pulse length, and pulse repetition frequency. We then tested the system in vivo by delivering PLGA-NPs co-loaded with antisense-miRNA-21 and antisense-miRNA-10b in pig liver and kidney. Enhanced miRNA delivery was observed (1.9- to 3.7-fold increase) as a result of the US-MB treatment compared to untreated control regions. Additionally, we used highly fluorescent semiconducting polymer nanoparticles (SPNs) co-delivered with miRNA-loaded PLGA-NPs to visually assess NP delivery. Fluorescent microscopy of SPNs confirmed NP extravasation and showed the presence of particles in the extravascular compartment. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of treated tissues did not reveal tissue damage. The results presented in this manuscript suggest that enhanced delivery of miRNA-loaded NPs to target regions in deep organs is feasible in large animal models using the proposed platform.

[1]  F. Gleeson,et al.  Safety and feasibility of ultrasound-triggered targeted drug delivery of doxorubicin from thermosensitive liposomes in liver tumours (TARDOX): a single-centre, open-label, phase 1 trial , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  Nir Lipsman,et al.  Blood–brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease using MR-guided focused ultrasound , 2018, Nature Communications.

[3]  L. Tian,et al.  Longitudinal assessment of ultrasound‐guided complementary microRNA therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[4]  John F. Callan,et al.  Gemcitabine loaded microbubbles for targeted chemo‐sonodynamic therapy of pancreatic cancer , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[5]  A. Molven,et al.  A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[6]  J. Willmann,et al.  Ultrasound-guided therapeutic modulation of hepatocellular carcinoma using complementary microRNAs. , 2016, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[7]  Lang Li,et al.  Ultrasound‐Targeted Microbubble Destruction Enhances Gene Expression of microRNA‐21 in Swine Heart via Intracoronary Delivery , 2015, Echocardiography.

[8]  J. Willmann,et al.  Ultrasound-guided delivery of microRNA loaded nanoparticles into cancer. , 2015, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[9]  Narayana M. Sekar,et al.  Polymer Nanoparticles Mediated Codelivery of AntimiR-10b and AntimiR-21 for Achieving Triple Negative Breast Cancer Therapy , 2015, ACS nano.

[10]  L. Duchateau,et al.  Theranostic mRNA-loaded Microbubbles in the Lymphatics of Dogs: Implications for Drug Delivery , 2015, Theranostics.

[11]  Jesse V. Jokerst,et al.  Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles as Photoacoustic Molecular Imaging Probes in Living Mice , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[12]  R. Paulmurugan,et al.  Polymer nanoparticles for drug and small silencing RNA delivery to treat cancers of different phenotypes. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[13]  O. Gilja,et al.  Sonoporation-Enhanced Chemotherapy Significantly Reduces Primary Tumour Burden in an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[14]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[15]  Kinam Park,et al.  Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. , 2011, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[16]  George A. Calin,et al.  RNA interference in the clinic: challenges and future directions , 2011, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  R. Jain,et al.  Delivering nanomedicine to solid tumors , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[18]  J. Hossack,et al.  Targeted gene transfection from microbubbles into vascular smooth muscle cells using focused, ultrasound-mediated delivery. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  C. Croce Causes and consequences of microRNA dysregulation in cancer , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  C. Croce,et al.  MicroRNAs in Cancer. , 2009, Annual review of medicine.

[21]  Daniel B. Martin,et al.  Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Alexander L. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[23]  Mark Borden,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery. , 2007, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[24]  Jørgen Arendt Jensen,et al.  Synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[25]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[26]  C. Croce,et al.  MicroRNA signatures in human cancers , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  Manabu Kinoshita,et al.  Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Vibrating microbubbles poking individual cells: drug transfer into cells via sonoporation. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[29]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[30]  Kishan Dholakia,et al.  Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation , 2005 .

[31]  P. Cullis,et al.  Drug Delivery Systems: Entering the Mainstream , 2004, Science.

[32]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[33]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[35]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[36]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging for small scale systems , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.