Political Limits to Interorganizational Consensus and Change

When efforts at collaborative problem solving take place in interorganizational settings, political issues arise with respect to the distribution ofpower among various organizations with a stake in the matters being considered. This article discusses the efforts of the National Coal Policy Project (NCPP), a collaborative change effort by representatives of environmental groups andfirms mining and using coal, to achieve a consensus on national coal policy in a nonadversarial, nontraditional setting. The authors 'study of the NCPPexplores three political issues: the role of power in the selection of participants in the NCPP negotiations, the role of power in each stakeholder's decision as to whether or not to participate in the project, and the power of the NCPP participants to have the project recommendations implemented. The authors conclude that successful implementation depends upon the perceived legitimacy of the project and those selecting its participants, and on the ability to include all key stakeholders. This study has implicationsfor planned change in both interorganizational and intraorganizational settings.

[1]  B. Gray.  Conditions Facilitating Interorganizational Collaboration , 1985 .

[2]  J. McCann.  Design Guidelines for Social Problem-Solving Interventions , 1983 .

[3]  Eric Trist,et al.  Referent Organizations and the Development of Inter-Organizational Domains , 1983 .

[4]  K. Provan.  The Federation as an Interorganizational Linkage Network , 1983 .

[5]  R. Kaplan.  Intervention in a Loosely Organized System: An Encounter with Non-Being , 1982, The Journal of applied behavioral science.

[6]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Managing conflict at organizational interfaces , 1982 .

[7]  Thomas G. Cummings,et al.  Systems Theory for Organization Development. , 1982 .

[8]  H. Brinton Milward,et al.  Inter Organizational Policy Systems and Research on Public Organizations , 1982 .

[9]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[10]  B. G. Gricar,et al.  Conflict, Power, and Organization in a Changing Community , 1981 .

[11]  Negotiating Interorganizational Orders , 1980 .

[12]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Environmental Linkages and Power in Resource-Dependence Relations between Organizations. , 1980 .

[13]  John P. Kotter,et al.  Managing External Dependence , 1979 .

[14]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[15]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Visionaries and Villains: The Politics of Designing Interorganizational Relations , 1977 .

[16]  M. R. Wessel.  Review: The Rule of Reason: A New Approach to Corporate Litigation , 1977 .

[17]  J. L. Metcalfe,et al.  Organizational Strategies and Interorganizational Networks , 1976 .

[18]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Resource Dependence and in Terorganiza Tional Relations , 1976 .

[19]  F. Wickert,et al.  Humanizing organizational behavior , 1976 .

[20]  J. K. Benson.  The Interorganizational Network as a Political Economy , 1975 .

[21]  William A. Gamson,et al.  The strategy of social protest , 1975 .

[22]  Andre L. Delbecq,et al.  CONTEXTUAL VARIABLES AFFECTING DECISION MAKING IN PROGRAM PLANNING , 1974 .

[23]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Dependency and Vulnerability: An Exchange Approach to the Control of Organizations. , 1974 .

[24]  W. Warner Burke,et al.  The social technology of organization development , 1972 .

[25]  R. Perrucci,et al.  Leaders and Ruling Elites: The Interorganizational Bases of Community Power , 1970 .

[26]  R. Flacks.  Protest or Conform: Some Social Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy , 1969 .

[27]  R. Walton.  Interpersonal peacemaking : confrontations and third-party consultation , 1969 .

[28]  R. Warren,et al.  The Interorganizational Field as a Focus for Investigation , 1967 .

[29]  Saul David Alinsky,et al.  Reveille for Radicals , 1946 .