A comparison of the mechanical performance characteristics of seven drug‐eluting stent systems

Objectives: Mechanical properties of drug eluting stents (DES) will be measured to provide comparable numerical data to assess deliverability, and thus clinical performance. Background: DES are routinely used in coronary interventions to reduce the rates of restenosis and target vessel revascularizations. Current research is primarily concerned with issues related to late stent thrombosis. However, mechanical properties of DES are a critical determinant of deliverability, and consequently the ultimate arbiter of their clinical performance. Methods: Mechanical properties (pushability, trackability, crossability) were measured under standardized in‐vitro conditions. The vessel models were derived from typical vessel anatomy but adapted to the individual tests. Additionally, profile and bending forces of the stent segment of the delivery system were measured. Seven different commercially available balloon‐expandable coronary DES systems were included. All stents were 3.0 mm diameter with a stent length from 14 to 18 mm. Results: The pushability expressed as the ratio of distal force at a specific proximal push force (4N) ranged between 38.66 and 18.53%. The trackability as the mean track‐forces ranged from 0.551 N to 1.137 N. One stent system could not pass this test. The mean crossing forces at a 1.4 mm stenosis model ranged from 0.038 N up to 0.103 N. The mean crimped stent profiles ranged from 1.055 mm to 1.198 mm and the bending stiffness of the crimped stent was 17.22 to 47.20 Nmm2. Conclusion: Better understanding of mechanical properties of DES shall improve tactile skills of the interventionists during PCI and to improve criteria for DES selection in specific clinical settings. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Timmis Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: catheter technology and procedural guidelines. , 1990, British heart journal.

[2]  James E Tcheng,et al.  Coronary artery stents: Evaluating new designs for contemporary percutaneous intervention , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  K. Schmitz,et al.  TRACKABILITY, CROSSABILITY, AND PUSHABILITY OF CORONARY STENT SYSTEMS - AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[4]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Coronary-artery stents. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Composition- and history-dependent radial compressive behavior of human atherosclerotic plaque. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  J. Mathis,et al.  Performance characteristics of microcatheter systems in a standardized tortuous pathway. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  M. Briel,et al.  Mortality in randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting vs. bare metal stents in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. , 2006, European heart journal.

[8]  Gladius Lewis,et al.  Materials, fluid dynamics, and solid mechanics aspects of coronary artery stents: a state-of-the-art review. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[9]  William Wijns,et al.  A Cause for Concern , 2007 .

[10]  G. Schuler,et al.  Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of 4 different stent designs. , 2003, American heart journal.

[11]  T W Kaulich,et al.  Physical properties of endovascular stents: an experimental comparison. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[12]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Compressive stress-relaxation of human atherosclerotic plaque. , 2001, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[13]  K. Schmitz,et al.  In-Vitro Examination of Clinically Relevant Stent Parameters , 2022 .

[14]  J. Ormiston,et al.  Stent longitudinal flexibility: A comparison of 13 stent designs before and after balloon expansion , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  J. Dyet,et al.  Mechanical properties of metallic stents: How do these properties influence the choice of stent for specific lesions? , 2009, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[16]  C. König,et al.  Stent Struts and Articulations: Their Impact on Balloon-Expandable Stents’ Hoop Strength, Pushability, and Radiopacity in an Experimental Setting , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[17]  Gd Rotterdam Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice:data from a large two-institutional cohort study , 2007 .

[18]  William Wijns,et al.  Stent thrombosis late after implantation of first-generation drug-eluting stents: a cause for concern. , 2007, Circulation.

[19]  Régis Rieu,et al.  Assessment of the trackability, flexibility, and conformability of coronary stents: A comparative analysis , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[20]  Johannes Rieber,et al.  Influence of stent design and deployment technique on neointima formation and vascular remodeling , 2002, Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.