Sensor Selection for Active Information Fusion

Active information fusion is to selectively choose the sensors so that the information gain can compensate the cost spent in information gathering. However, determining the most informative and cost-effective sensors requires an evaluation of all possible sensor combinations, which is computationally intractable, particularly, when information-theoretic criterion is used. This paper presents a methodology to actively select a sensor subset with the best tradeoff between information gain and sensor cost by exploiting the synergy among sensors. Our approach includes two aspects: a method for efficient mutual information computation and a graph-theoretic approach to reduce search space. The approach can reduce the time complexity significantly in searching for a near optimal sensor subset.

[1]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Maximum Mutual Information Principle for Dynamic Sensor Query Problems , 2003, IPSN.

[2]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[3]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1997, IEA/AIE.

[4]  W. Runggaldier,et al.  Optimization of Observations: a Stochastic Control Approach , 1997 .

[5]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Selective perception policies for guiding sensing and computation in multimodal systems: a comparative analysis , 2003, ICMI '03.

[6]  Jean-Bernard Choquel,et al.  A new probabilistic and entropy fusion approach for management of information sources , 2004, Inf. Fusion.

[7]  Alf Isaksson,et al.  On sensor scheduling via information theoretic criteria , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[8]  Steen Kristensen,et al.  Sensor planning with Bayesian decision theory , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[9]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[10]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  An Approximate Nonmyopic Computation for Value of Information , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Qiang Ji,et al.  A factor tree inference algorithm for Bayesian networks and its applications , 2004, 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence.

[12]  Yu-Chi Ho,et al.  Randomization and super-heuristics in choosing sensor sets for target tracking applications , 1999, Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.99CH36304).

[13]  Feng Zhao,et al.  Information-Driven Dynamic Sensor Collaboration for Tracking Applications , 2002 .

[14]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  Vikram Krishnamurthy,et al.  Algorithms for optimal scheduling and management of hidden Markov model sensors , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Information Theoretic Sensor Data Selection for Active Object Recognition and State Estimation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[17]  D. Castañón Approximate dynamic programming for sensor management , 1997, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  Lucas Paletta,et al.  Active object recognition by view integration and reinforcement learning , 2000, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[19]  Balaram Das Representing Uncertainties Using Bayesian Networks , 1999 .