An unresolved issue in rhabdomyosarcoma treatment: The duration of chemotherapy

Clinical trials have tested different chemotherapy regimens to improve outcome for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), but therapy duration has never been explicitly evaluated. North American trials evolved from longer (104 weeks) to shorter duration (24‐42 weeks). In Europe, treatment duration similarly evolved from 35 to 48 to 22 weeks for lower risk patients and from 56 to 72 to 27 weeks for higher risk patients. There was no evidence that chemotherapy duration influenced outcome over time. The recent RMS2005 trial showed an improved survival with the addition of 24 weeks of low‐dose chemotherapy. Treatment duration remains a question to be addressed in future trials.

[1]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Vinorelbine and continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide as maintenance chemotherapy in patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS 2005): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[2]  W. Meyer Maintenance chemotherapy in rhabdomyosarcoma: the new standard of care. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  S. Donaldson,et al.  Increased local failure for patients with intermediate‐risk rhabdomyosarcoma on ARST0531: A report from the Children's Oncology Group , 2019, Cancer.

[4]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Rhabdomyosarcoma , 2019, Nature Reviews Disease Primers.

[5]  James R. Anderson,et al.  The addition of cixutumumab or temozolomide to intensive multiagent chemotherapy is feasible but does not improve outcome for patients with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma , 2018, Cancer.

[6]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Addition of Vincristine and Irinotecan to Vincristine, Dactinomycin, and Cyclophosphamide Does Not Improve Outcome for Intermediate-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Stevens,et al.  Addition of dose-intensified doxorubicin to standard chemotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma (EpSSG RMS 2005): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  E. Koscielniak,et al.  Fifty years of rhabdomyosarcoma studies on both sides of the pond and lessons learned. , 2018, Cancer treatment reviews.

[9]  K. McHugh,et al.  Open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase II study of the EpSSG and the ITCC evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in childhood and adolescent patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (the BERNIE study). , 2017, European journal of cancer.

[10]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Reduction of cyclophosphamide dose for patients with subset 2 low‐risk rhabdomyosarcoma is associated with an increased risk of recurrence: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group , 2017, Cancer.

[11]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Prognostic Factors for Outcome in Localized Extremity Rhabdomyosarcoma. Pooled Analysis from Four International Cooperative Groups , 2015, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[12]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Shorter-duration therapy using vincristine, dactinomycin, and lower-dose cyclophosphamide with or without radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed low-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  J. Merks Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatric age: results of a pooled analysis from North American and European cooperative groups. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[14]  M. Stevens,et al.  Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma in pediatric age: results of a pooled analysis from North American and European cooperative groups. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  S. Spunt,et al.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: Soft tissue sarcomas , 2013, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[16]  M. Stevens,et al.  Randomized comparison of intensified six-drug versus standard three-drug chemotherapy for high-risk nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma and other chemotherapy-sensitive childhood soft tissue sarcomas: long-term results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology MMT95 study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Carli,et al.  Long‐term results in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Italian cooperative study RMS 79 , 2012, Pediatric blood & cancer.

[18]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Results of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group D9602 protocol, using vincristine and dactinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy, for newly diagnosed patients with low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's O , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: children's oncology group study D9803. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  R. Schmelzle,et al.  Cooperative trial CWS-91 for localized soft tissue sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  H. B. Marsden,et al.  Treatment of nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma in childhood and adolescence: third study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology--SIOP Malignant Mesenchymal Tumor 89. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  A. Ferrari,et al.  Paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma: report from the Italian and German Cooperative Group. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  James R. Anderson,et al.  Benefit of intensified therapy for patients with local or regional embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: results from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  G. Henze,et al.  Results of treatment for soft tissue sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: a final report of the German Cooperative Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study CWS-86. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  P. Voûte,et al.  Treatment of non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas in childhood and adolescence. Results of the second study of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology: MMT84. , 1998, European journal of cancer.

[27]  E. Gehan,et al.  The Third Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[28]  E. Gehan,et al.  The intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study‐II , 1993, Cancer.

[29]  H. Jürgens,et al.  Treatment of soft tissue sarcoma in childhood and adolescence: A report of the german cooperative soft tissue sarcoma study , 1992, Cancer.

[30]  E. Gehan,et al.  The intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study‐I. A final report , 1988, Cancer.

[31]  P. Voûte,et al.  Prognostic factors in 281 children with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) at diagnosis. , 1988, Medical and pediatric oncology.