Information fusion for object & situation assessment in sensor networks

A semantic framework for information fusion in sensor networks for object and situation assessment is proposed. The overall vision is to construct machine representations that would enable human-like perceptual understanding of observed scenes via fusion of heterogeneous sensor data. In this regard, a hierarchical framework is proposed that is based on the Data Fusion Information Group (DFIG) model. Unlike a simple set-theoretic information fusion methodology that leads to loss of information, relational dependencies are modeled as cross-machines called relational Probabilistic Finite State Automata using the xD-Markov machine construction. This leads to a tractable approach for modeling composite patterns as structured sets for both object and scene representation. An illustrative example demonstrates the superior capability of the proposed methodology for pattern classification in urban scenarios.

[1]  Fredrik Johansson,et al.  A Comparison between Two Approaches to Threat Evaluation in an Air Defense Scenario , 2008, MDAI.

[2]  Bao-Shu Wang,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Force Aggregation and Classification in Situation Assessment , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[3]  Robert Suzic,et al.  A generic model of tactical plan recognition for threat assessment , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  M. L. Hinman,et al.  Some computational approaches for situation assessment and impact assessment , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[5]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[6]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Blind Construction of Optimal Nonlinear Recursive Predictors for Discrete Sequences , 2004, UAI.

[7]  Mieczyslaw M. Kokar,et al.  Ontology-based situation awareness , 2009, Inf. Fusion.

[8]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  A.-C. Boury-Brisset,et al.  Ontology-based approach for information fusion , 2003, Sixth International Conference of Information Fusion, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[10]  Kathryn B. Laskey,et al.  Multi-entity Bayesian networks for situation assessment , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[11]  Vladimir Gorodetsky,et al.  On-line update of situation assessment: A generic approach , 2005, Int. J. Knowl. Based Intell. Eng. Syst..

[12]  Asok Ray,et al.  Symbolic time series analysis via wavelet-based partitioning , 2006, Signal Process..

[13]  Subrata Das,et al.  Situation assessment via Bayesian belief networks , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[14]  Hung Hai Bui,et al.  A General Model for Online Probabilistic Plan Recognition , 2003, IJCAI.

[15]  Jeffrey D. Ullman,et al.  Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation, 2nd edition , 2001, SIGA.

[16]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  Sensor Network Operations , 2006 .

[17]  Asok Ray,et al.  Symbolic dynamic analysis of complex systems for anomaly detection , 2004, Signal Process..

[18]  I. Kadar,et al.  Resource management coordination with level 2/3 fusion issues and challenges [Panel Report] , 2008, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine.

[19]  Stephen M. Jameson,et al.  Architectures for Distributed Information Fusion To Support Situation Awareness on the Digital Battlefield , 2002 .

[20]  Hsinchun Chen,et al.  Terrorism Informatics: Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security , 2008 .

[21]  Asok Ray,et al.  Automated behaviour recognition in mobile robots using symbolic dynamic filtering , 2008 .