Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning

This paper presents new definitions for obtaining reproducible results in numerical phone dosimetry. Numerous numerical dosimetric studies have been published about the exposure of mobile phone users which concluded with conflicting results. However, many of these studies lack reproducibility due to shortcomings in the description of the phone positioning. The new approach was tested by two groups applying two different numerical program packages to compare the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomically correct head models. A novel definition for the positioning of mobile phones next to anatomically correct head models is given along with other essential parameters to be reported. The definition is solely based on anatomical characteristics of the head. A simple up-to-date phone model was used to determine the peak spatial specific absorption rate (SAR) of mobile phones in SAM and in the anatomically correct head models. The results were validated by measurements. The study clearly shows that SAM gives a conservative estimate of the exposure in anatomically correct head models for head only tissue. Depending on frequency, phone position and head size the numerically calculated 10 g averaged SAR in the pinna can be up to 2.1 times greater than the peak spatial SAR in SAM. Measurements in small structures, such as the pinna, will significantly increase the uncertainty; therefore SAM was designed for SAR assessment in the head only. Whether SAM will provide a conservative value for the pinna depends on the pinna SAR limit of the safety standard considered.

[1]  Quirino Balzano,et al.  Effects of ear-connection modeling on the electromagnetic-energy absorption in a human-head phantom exposed to a dipole antenna field at 835 MHz , 2002 .

[2]  B. Szentpali,et al.  Human exposure to electromagnetic fields from mobile phones , 1999, 4th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services. TELSIKS'99 (Cat. No.99EX365).

[3]  Wolfgang Kainz,et al.  Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models , 2004, Biomedical engineering online.

[4]  N. Kuster,et al.  Differences in energy absorption between heads of adults and children in the near field of sources. , 1998, Health physics.

[5]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Electromagnetic absorption in the human head and neck for mobile telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz , 1996 .

[6]  M J Ackerman,et al.  The Visible Human Project , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[7]  O. Gandhi,et al.  Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  A. Ahlbom.  Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[9]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments , 1996 .

[10]  Osamu Fujiwara,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of electromagnetic absorption characteristics in realistic human head models of adult and children for 900-MHz mobile telephones , 2003 .

[11]  M. Martínez‐Búrdalo,et al.  Comparison of FDTD-calculated specific absorption rate in adults and children when using a mobile phone at 900 and 1800 MHz. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Niels Kuster,et al.  Suitability of FDTD-based TCAD tools RF design of mobile phones , 2003 .

[13]  N. Kuster,et al.  The dependence of EM energy absorption upon human head modeling at 900 MHz , 1996 .

[14]  Marta Cavagnaro,et al.  Evaluation of the SAR distribution in the human head for cellular phones used in a partially closed environment , 1996 .

[15]  M. Stuchly,et al.  A study of the handset antenna and human body interaction , 1996 .

[16]  J J W Lagendijk,et al.  Computation of high-resolution SAR distributions in a head due to a radiating dipole antenna representing a hand-held mobile phone. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  O.P. Gandhi,et al.  Inaccuracies of a plastic "pinna" SAM for SAR testing of cellular telephones against IEEE and ICNIRP safety guidelines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[18]  R Matthes,et al.  Response to questions and comments on ICNIRP. , 1998, Health physics.

[19]  N. Kuster,et al.  A numerical and experimental comparison of human head phantoms for compliance testing of mobile telephone equipment , 2005, Bioelectromagnetics.

[20]  V. Anderson.  Comparisons of peak SAR levels in concentric sphere head models of children and adults for irradiation by a dipole at 900 MHz. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Soichi Watanabe,et al.  Size of head phantoms for standard measurements of SAR due to wireless communication devices , 2004 .

[22]  Hyung-do Choi,et al.  Human Head Size and SAR Characteristics for Handset Exposure , 2002 .

[23]  P. Dimbylow,et al.  SAR calculations in an anatomically realistic model of the head for mobile communication transceivers at 900 MHz and 1.8 GHz. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Robert A. Walker,et al.  Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Summary Statistics, Interim Report for 1988 , 1989 .

[25]  L. A. Khruleva,et al.  Instruments for removing ureteral stones , 1969 .

[26]  John H. Davis.  Cellular mobile telephone , 1988 .