Open Source, Social Activism and "Necessary Trade-offs" in the Digital Enclosure: A Case Study of Platform Co-operative, Loomio.org

This article explores the tensions and tradeoffs facing the open source platform co-operative Loomio.org, an online tool that aims to decentralize power through deliberative decision-making. Combining discourse analysis with political economy, we demonstrate how Loomio’s politics of resistance is built directly into the architectural design and platform structure, which invites users to participate in its development and evolution. Yet by prioritizing its social justice mission, Loomio must make certain tradeoffs around data storage and management that paradoxically threatens to compromise its wider social goals. The realities of operating an open source platform are discussed in the context of the contemporary digital economy. We argue that if platform co-operatives like Loomio are to fully realize their goals, a digital commons unencumbered by capitalism requires access to reliable, affordable and accessible alternatives to the existing Internet infrastructure.

[1]  P. Salus.  The Cathedral and the Bazaar , 2000 .

[2]  Tiziana Terranova.  Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age , 2004 .

[3]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[4]  Kirstie Ball,et al.  Organization, Surveillance and the Body: Towards a Politics of Resistance , 2005 .

[5]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[6]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[7]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  The Open Source Movement: A Revolution in Software Development , 2008, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Phoebe Moore,et al.  Exploitation of the self in community-based software production: Workers' freedoms or firm foundations? , 2009 .

[9]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[10]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  code 2.0 , 2009 .

[11]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[12]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld , 2009, New Media Soc..

[13]  R. Gehl.  A Cultural and Political Economy of Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[14]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Privacy as a luxury commodity , 2010, First Monday.

[15]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[16]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  Surveillance and Alienation in the Online Economy , 2010 .

[17]  Manuel Castells,et al.  A Network Theory of Power , 2011 .

[18]  I. Goodwin.  Power to the People? Web 2.0, Facebook, and DIY Cultural Citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand , 2011 .

[19]  D. Parry,et al.  Ubiquitous Surveillance , 2011 .

[20]  Christian Fuchs,et al.  Social media and capitalism , 2013 .

[21]  Thomas F. Corrigan,et al.  Hope Labor: The Role of Employment Prospects in Online Social Production , 2013 .

[22]  J. Dijck.  Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology , 2014 .

[23]  U. Huws.  Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age , 2014 .

[24]  Alex Williams,et al.  Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work , 2015 .

[25]  M. Sande.  Fighting with Tools: Prefiguration and Radical Politics in the Twenty-First Century , 2015 .

[26]  Marisol Sandoval.  Fighting precarity with co-operation?: Worker co-operatives in the cultural sector. , 2016 .

[27]  Trebor Scholz,et al.  Platform Cooperativism. Challenging the Corporate Sharing Economy , 2016 .

[28]  Melanie Grunwald,et al.  Convergence Culture Where Old And New Media Collide , 2016 .