Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Creating Hydraulic Fracture Complexity in the Bakken Central Basin

The Bakken drilling boom in North Dakota has seen a frenzy of activity over the past several years as operators sought to hold acreage and create value with the drill bit. This has been particularly true in the Central Basin portion of the Williston Basin where initial wells drilled prior to 2008 were uneconomic. However, advances in completion technology caused such a fundamental shift in economics that the whole Central Basin area of over 2500 square miles has been opened to economic development with ~100 rigs currently drilling in the region. The most fundamental change in completion design has been the incorporation of “high-intensity” multi-stage fracturing. What makes Bakken completion design fundamentally different from recent shale gas developments has been the widespread use of uncemented liners with external packers in the open-hole lateral in order to create the multi-stage zonal isolation. As operators have advanced the application of multi-stage completion techniques there has been a wide variety of completion equipment used and stimulation designs that have been pumped. This operator decided to employ a completion design that comprised: (i) An open-hole “uncemented” liner section; (ii) Annular zonal isolation created by swell packers; (iii) The use of “plug and perf” technology to individually open successive zones to stimulation; (iv) The pumping of slickwater fracture treatment fluids at high rate; (v) The use of high-quality ceramic proppant to generate the required fracture conductivity. Production data are presented from 58 wells in which this completion and stimulation design has been conducted, which show that the use of this approach has resulted in well performance that is 25-45% superior to any other Bakken completion technique. Geology The Bakken Formation (highlighted in red in Figure 1) is located within the Williston Basin, which spans southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba in Canada as well as North Dakota and Montana in the United States. The basin was formed as a subtle downwarping between the Superior Craton to the northeast and the Wyoming Craton to the southwest. The Williston Basin is a gently dipping basin with very little structural deformation, with the exception of a small number of structural features including the Nesson Anticline and the Cedar Creek Anticline, as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1—Location of the Williston Basin.

[1]  Stephan H. Nordeng,et al.  Chapter 13: Comparing Production to Structure Over the Course of Bakken Development: The Diminishing Significance of the “Sweet Spot” in Exploration , 2011 .

[2]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity , 2009 .

[3]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  Integration of Microseismic-Fracture-Mapping Results With Numerical Fracture Network Production Modeling in the Barnett Shale , 2006 .

[4]  Leen Weijers,et al.  Geometry of Hydraulic Fractures Induced From Horizontal Wellbores , 1994 .

[5]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity , 2009 .

[6]  Andrew P. Bunger,et al.  Parameters Affecting the Interaction Among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures , 2012 .

[7]  Robert M. Cluff,et al.  Chapter 3: Depositional Facies and Petrophysical Analysis of the Bakken Formation, Parshall Field and Surrounding Area, Mountrail County, North Dakota , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher A. Wright,et al.  Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping , 2004 .

[9]  W. W. Aud,et al.  Using Real-Time Downhole Microseismic To Evaluate Fracture Geometry for Horizontal Packer-Sleeve Completions in the Bakken Formation, Elm Coulee Field, Montana , 2011 .

[10]  Julie A. LeFever Horizontal Drilling in the Williston Basin, United States and Canada , 1992 .

[11]  Michael J. Mayerhofer,et al.  What Is Stimulated Reservoir Volume , 2010 .

[12]  J. Murray Quantitative fracture study; sanish pool, McKenzie County, North Dakota , 1968 .

[13]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Optimizing Fracture Spacing and Sequencing in Horizontal-Well Fracturing , 2011 .

[14]  Andrew P. Bunger,et al.  Parameters Effecting the Interaction among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures , 2011 .

[15]  E. Gomez,et al.  Stimulation Results and Completion Implications From the Consortium Multiwell Project in the North Dakota Bakken Shale , 2009 .