RUNNING INJURIES: FOREFOOT VERSUS REARFOOT AND BAREFOOT VERSUS SHOD: A BIOMECHANIST'S PERSPECTIVE

In recent years, there has been a debate regarding the use of different footfall patterns to reduce injury risk and enhance performance. Humans have three footfall patterns available to them when running: rearfoot, midfoot and forefoot. These different patterns are distinguished by the portion of the foot that’s makes initial contact with the ground. Interestingly, until very recently, there has been little research to show the pros or cons of the various footfall patterns. Here we will discuss several studies that have been carried out to distinguish footfall patterns in terms of kinematics and kinetics, running economy, the effect of surface and coordination on the risk of running injury.

[1]  I. Davis,et al.  Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners , 2010, Nature.

[2]  D R Carrier,et al.  The influence of foot posture on the cost of transport in humans , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[3]  D. Morgan,et al.  Effect of step length optimization on the aerobic demand of running. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  Erin Higgins,et al.  Foot strike patterns of recreational and sub-elite runners in a long-distance road race , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  K. R. Williams,et al.  Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  J. Hamill,et al.  Kinetic asymmetry in female runners with and without retrospective tibial stress fractures. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Allison H. Gruber,et al.  Are footfall patterns a function of running surface? , 2011 .

[9]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Biomechanical predictors of retrospective tibial stress fractures in runners. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  W. Kraemer,et al.  FOOT STRIKE PATTERNS OF RUNNERS AT THE 15‐KM POINT DURING AN ELITE‐LEVEL HALF MARATHON , 2007, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[11]  K Manal,et al.  Three-dimensional kinetic analysis of running: significance of secondary planes of motion. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  Ba Kerr,et al.  Footstrike patterns in distance running , 1983 .

[13]  Clare E. Milner,et al.  Biomechanical factors associated with tibial stress fracture in female runners. , 2006, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  H. P. Crowell,et al.  Lower extremity stiffness: implications for performance and injury. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  Allison H. Gruber,et al.  Frequency Content of the Vertical Ground Reaction Force Component During Rearfoot and Forefoot Running Patterns: 720 , 2011 .

[16]  P. Komi,et al.  Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach. , 1987, International journal of sports medicine.

[17]  Allison H. Gruber,et al.  Lower extremity joint stiffness characteristics during running with different footfall patterns , 2014, European journal of sport science.

[18]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Impact characteristics in shod and barefoot running , 2011 .