Assessment of combustion submodels for turbulent nonpremixed hydrocarbon flames

Data bases generated by direct numerical simulation (DNS) of nonpremixed combustion are used to evaluate stationary laminar flamelet and conditional moment closure (CMC) models of turbulent combustion. The chemical kinetics used for the simulation and modeling is a systematically reduced two-step mechanism for hydrocarbon combustion. Heat release effects on the chemistry are included but a constant density assumption is used. Three different Reynolds numbers and a range of Damkohler numbers are considered. Two different versions of stationary laminar flamelet models are considered. In one version, the instantaneous turbulent scalar dissipation rate at stoichiometry is used to match the laminar flamelets, whereas in another version the conditional average of scalar dissipation at stoichiometry is used. In the CMC calculations, turbulent mixing is modelled by a presumed beta function pdf with the mixture fraction variance being the only input quantity and this is obtained from the DNS. CMC predictions of major and minor species are excellent and are always within 6% despite the presence of some local extinction. Both versions of flamelet models predict the major species with much less accuracy than this. The minor species predictions, and hence the reaction rate predictions, are even less accurate.

[1]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[2]  S. K. Liew,et al.  A stretched laminar flamelet model of turbulent nonpremixed combustion , 1984 .

[3]  Roger Temam,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Combustion Phenomena , 1985 .

[4]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Reexamination of Shock-Tube Measurements of the Rate Coefficient of H + O2 .fwdarw. OH + O , 1994 .

[5]  R. Borghi Turbulent combustion modelling , 1988 .

[6]  N. Swaminathan,et al.  Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Nonpremixed Hydrocarbon Reaction Zones Using aTwo-step Reduced Mechanism , 1997 .

[7]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Multicomponent diffusion of various admixtures in turbulent flow , 1990 .

[8]  Assessment of turbulent combustion submodels using the linear Eddy model , 1996 .

[9]  S. K. Liew,et al.  Flamelet models of turbulent non-premixed combustion , 1981 .

[10]  Robert J. Kee,et al.  On reduced mechanisms for methaneair combustion in nonpremixed flames , 1990 .

[11]  R. Barlow,et al.  A Comparison of CMC and PDF Modelling Predictions with Experimental Nitric Oxide LIF/Raman Measurements in a Turbulent H2 Jet Flame , 1995 .

[12]  James J. Riley,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of turbulent reacting flow using a reduced hydrogenoxygen mechanism , 1993 .

[13]  D. Haworth,et al.  Stretched laminar flamelet modeling of a turbulent jet diffusion flame , 1988 .

[14]  Willi Jäger,et al.  Complex Chemical Reaction Systems , 1987 .

[15]  Laszlo Fuchs,et al.  Sensitivity study of turbulent reacting flow modeling in gas turbine combustors , 1994 .

[16]  James J. Riley,et al.  Direct numerical solution of turbulent nonpremixed combustion with multistep hydrogen-oxygen kinetics , 1997 .

[17]  Robert W. Bilger Turbulent diffusion flames , 1989 .

[18]  Elaine S. Oran,et al.  Numerical Approaches to Combustion Modeling , 1991 .

[19]  F. Williams,et al.  Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1981 .

[20]  V. R. Kuznetsov,et al.  A test of a flamelet model for turbulent nonpremixed combustion , 1994 .

[21]  Mitchell D. Smooke,et al.  Reduced Kinetic Mechanisms and Asymptotic Approximations for Methane-Air Flames: A Topical Volume , 1991 .