Understory vegetation as an indicator for floodplain forest restoration in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley, U.S.A

In the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley (MAV), complete alteration of river-floodplain hydrology allowed for widespread conversion of forested bottomlands to intensive agriculture, resulting in nearly 80% forest loss. Governmental programs have attempted to restore forest habitat and functions within this altered landscape by the methods of tree planting (afforestation) and local hydrologic enhancement on reclaimed croplands. Early assessments identified factors that influenced whether planting plus tree colonization could establish an overstory community similar to natural bottomland forests. The extent to which afforested sites develop typical understory vegetation has not been evaluated, yet understory composition may be indicative of restored site conditions. As part of a broad study quantifying the ecosystem services gained from restoration efforts, understory vegetation was compared between 37 afforested sites and 26 mature forest sites. Differences in vegetation attributes for species growth forms, wetland indicator classes, and native status were tested with univariate analyses; floristic composition data were analyzed by multivariate techniques. Understory vegetation of restoration sites was generally hydrophytic, but species composition differed from that of mature bottomland forest because of young successional age and differing responses of plant growth forms. Attribute and floristic variation among restoration sites was related to variation in canopy development and local wetness conditions, which in turn reflected both intrinsic site features and outcomes of restoration practices. Thus, understory vegetation is a useful indicator of functional progress in floodplain forest restoration.

[1]  K. Holl,et al.  Successional Models as Guides for Restoration of Riparian Forest Understory , 2011 .

[2]  E. Menges.  Environmental Correlates of Herb Species Composition in Five Southern Wisconsin Floodplain Forests , 1986 .

[3]  Loretta L. Battaglia,et al.  Sixteen years of old-field succession and reestablishment of a bottomland hardwood forest in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley , 2002, Wetlands.

[4]  S. Faulkner,et al.  A Quantitative Assessment of the Conservation Benefits of the Wetlands Reserve Program to Amphibians , 2013 .

[5]  B. Middleton.  Soil seed banks and the potential restoration of forested wetlands after farming , 2003 .

[6]  M. Shelton,et al.  Changes in plant species composition along an elevation gradient in an old-growth bottomland hardwood-Pinus taeda forest in southern Arkansas1 , 2005 .

[7]  J. Groninger,et al.  Succession of Exotic and Native Species Assemblages within Restored Floodplain Forests: A Test of the Parallel Dynamics Hypothesis , 2012 .

[8]  Diane De Steven,et al.  Multiple factors influence the vegetation composition of Southeast U.S. wetlands restored in the Wetlands Reserve Program1,2 , 2013 .

[9]  S. Faulkner,et al.  The importance of hydrology in restoration of bottomland hardwood wetland functions , 2008, Wetlands.

[10]  Juha Helenius,et al.  Agricultural drainage ditches, their biological importance and functioning , 2008 .

[11]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Innovations in afforestation of agricultural bottomlands to restore native forests in the eastern USA , 2010 .

[12]  F. Gilliam,et al.  The Ecological Significance of the Herbaceous Layer in Temperate Forest Ecosystems , 2007 .

[13]  Michael L. Schummer,et al.  Vegetative Forage Quality and Moist-soil Management on Wetlands Reserve Program Lands in Mississippi , 2012, Wetlands.

[14]  James A Allen.  Reforestation of Bottomland Hardwoods and the Issue of Woody Species Diversity , 1997 .

[15]  J. Viers,et al.  Multiscale Patterns of Riparian Plant Diversity and Implications for Restoration , 2012 .

[16]  D. Twedt.  Stand development on reforested bottomlands in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[17]  M. Chytrý,et al.  Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size , 2006 .

[18]  M. Cohen,et al.  Realizing ecosystem services: wetland hydrologic function along a gradient of ecosystem condition. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[19]  Elizabeth O. Murray,et al.  An ecosystem restoration model for the Mississippi Alluvial Valley based on geomorphology, soils, and hydrology , 2009, Wetlands.

[20]  Joseph R. Makuch,et al.  The first five years of the Conservation Effects Assessment Project , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[21]  C. M. Cooper,et al.  Vegetative and structural characteristics of agricultural drainages in the Mississippi Delta landscapes. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[22]  D. Twedt,et al.  The Role of the Wetland Reserve Program in Conservation Efforts in the Mississippi River Alluvial Valley , 2006 .

[23]  Walter G. Duffy,et al.  Wetland ecosystem services in California's Central Valley and implications for the Wetland Reserve Program , 2011 .

[24]  Susan C. Walls,et al.  Wetland Reserve Program Enhances Site Occupancy and Species Richness in Assemblages of Anuran Amphibians in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA , 2014, Wetlands.

[25]  John A. Stanturf,et al.  Recognizing and Overcoming Difficult Site Conditions for Afforestation of Bottomland Hardwoods , 2004, Ecological Restoration.

[26]  S. King,et al.  Evaluation of Reforestation in the Lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley , 1999 .

[27]  Stephen P. Faulkner,et al.  Denitrification potential of different land-use types in an agricultural watershed, lower Mississippi valley , 2006 .

[28]  C. Richardson,et al.  Hydrologic, Edaphic, and Vegetative Responses to Microtopographic Reestablishment in a Restored Wetland , 2005 .

[29]  R. Haynes.  The Development of Bottomland Forest Restoration in the Lower Mississippi River Alluvial Valley , 2004, Ecological Restoration.

[30]  L. Battaglia,et al.  Evaluating Dispersal Limitation in Passive Bottomland Forest Restoration , 2008 .

[31]  S. Dufour,et al.  From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits , 2009 .

[32]  T. Moss.  Institutional drivers and constraints of floodplain restoration in Europe , 2007 .

[33]  Stephen P. Faulkner,et al.  Effects of conservation practices on wetland ecosystem services in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley , 2011 .

[34]  Samuel C. Pierce,et al.  Managing Artificially Drained Low-Gradient Agricultural Headwaters for Enhanced Ecosystem Functions , 2012, Biology.