Optimizing the operation of a two-phase anaerobic digestion system digesting grass silage.

This paper examines the optimization of an existing two-phase anaerobic digestion process using grass silage as a feedstock. The system comprises 6 leach beds connected to an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB). The existing system produced 305 L CH(4) kg(-1) VS added at an overall retention time of 42 days (6 leach beds emptied and fed sequentially every 7 days in series). The desired improvements were a reduction in retention time with increased methane production. It was noted in the existing system that biogas production and COD levels fell off in the last 2 days of each 7-day cycle. Thus the first change involved reduction in retention time to 30 days (6 leach beds fed sequentially every 5 days in series). This lead to a slight improvement in methane production (310 L CH(4) kg(-1) VS added). The second change was effected by separation of flows to the first stage (leach beds) and the second stage (UASB) through addition of an extra pump to optimize leaching. This led to an increase in CH(4) production (341 L CH(4) kg(-1) VS). The overall improvement from the existing system was an increase of 11.8% in methane production and a reduction in size or retention time of 40% (42 days decreased to 30 days retention time).

[1]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  Design Operation and Economy of Anaerobic Treatment , 1983 .

[2]  G. Zeeman,et al.  The effects of hydraulic and organic shock loads on the robustness of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating sewage. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  S. Ghosh Gasification of concentrated particulate and solid substrates by biphasic anaerobic digestion. , 1987 .

[4]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  What type of digester configurations should be employed to produce biomethane from grass silage , 2010 .

[5]  P. Zheng,et al.  Filamentous granular sludge bulking in a laboratory scale UASB reactor. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[6]  Gatze Lettinga,et al.  UASB Process design for various types of wastewaters. , 1991 .

[7]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Review of the integrated process for the production of grass biomethane. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  G. Demirer,et al.  Effect of operational parameters on anaerobic co‐digestion of dairy cattle manure and agricultural residues: A case study for the Kahramanmaraş region in Turkey , 2010 .

[9]  Manfred Lübken,et al.  Monofermentation of grass silage under mesophilic conditions: measurements and mathematical modeling with ADM 1. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Jeongsik Kim,et al.  Effects of various pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. , 2003, Journal of bioscience and bioengineering.

[11]  Y. Li,et al.  Microstructural analysis of UASB granules treating brewery wastewater , 1995 .

[12]  R. Mulder,et al.  Future perspectives in bioreactor development. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  K. Fukushi,et al.  Effect of acid speciation on solid waste liquefaction in an anaerobic acid digester. , 2004, Water research.

[14]  T. R. Sreekrishnan,et al.  Modelling anaerobic biofilm reactors--a review. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[15]  A. Nizami,et al.  Role of Leaching and Hydrolysis in a Two-Phase Grass Digestion System , 2010 .

[16]  A. Klapwijk,et al.  Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment , 1980 .

[17]  W. Liu,et al.  Characterization of microbial consortia in a terephthalate-degrading anaerobic granular sludge system. , 2001, Microbiology.

[18]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  The effects of operational and environmental variations on anaerobic wastewater treatment systems: a review. , 2006, Bioresource technology.

[19]  E. V. Ramasamy,et al.  High - Solids Anaerobic Digestion for the Recovery of Energy from Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) , 2000 .

[20]  Shweta Tripathi,et al.  Influence of extrinsic factors on granulation in UASB reactor , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[21]  M. Barlaz,et al.  Distributed model of solid waste anaerobic digestion: Effects of leachate recirculation and pH adjustment , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  Surendra Kumar,et al.  NUTRIENT REQUIREMENT FOR UASB PROCESS : A REVIEW , 1999 .

[23]  G. Kiely,et al.  How can we improve biomethane production per unit of feedstock in biogas plants , 2011 .

[24]  G. Kiely,et al.  Effect of thermal, chemical and thermo-chemical pre-treatments to enhance methane production. , 2010 .

[25]  Yun-Chul Chung,et al.  Effect of pH on phase separated anaerobic digestion , 2000 .

[26]  Xu Hai-Lou,et al.  A hybrid anaerobic solid-liquid bioreactor for food waste digestion , 2004, Biotechnology Letters.

[27]  Z. Bhatti,et al.  Microbial diversity in UASB reactors , 1997 .

[28]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Applicability and trends of anaerobic pre-treatment of municipal wastewater , 1992 .

[29]  Herbert H. P. Fang,et al.  Microbial distribution in UASB granules and its resulting effects , 2000 .

[30]  P. Mccarty,et al.  Chemistry for environmental engineering , 1978 .

[31]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Solids removal in upflow anaerobic reactors, a review. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[32]  A. Nizami,et al.  Design, Commissioning, and Start-Up of a Sequentially Fed Leach Bed Reactor Complete with an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Digesting Grass Silage , 2011 .

[33]  Bal As,et al.  Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. , 2001 .

[34]  James Jeffords,et al.  Guest Editorial: Protection or pork? , 1993 .

[35]  J. Rintala,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of grass silage in batch leach bed processes for methane production. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[36]  L Björnsson,et al.  Hydrolysis and microbial community analyses in two‐stage anaerobic digestion of energy crops , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[37]  H. W. Yu,et al.  Energy recovery from grass using two-phase anaerobic digestion. , 2002, Waste management.

[38]  F. Cecchi,et al.  A Mathematical Model of Volatile Fatty Acids (VFA) Production in a Plug-Flow Reactor Treating the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) , 1993 .

[39]  S. Gupta,et al.  Morphological study of the granules in UASB and hybrid reactors , 2005 .

[40]  Y. Ahn,et al.  Physicochemical Characterization of UASB Sludge with Different Size Distributions , 2002, Environmental technology.

[41]  T. Thamsiriroj,et al.  Difficulties Associated with Monodigestion of Grass as Exemplified by Commissioning a Pilot-Scale Digester , 2010 .

[42]  Grietje Zeeman,et al.  Advanced anaerobic wastewater treatment in the near future , 1997 .

[43]  A. Lehtomäki,et al.  Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Energy Crops: Methane Production, Nitrogen Mineralisation and Heavy Metal Mobilisation , 2006, Environmental technology.

[44]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  The effect of reactor design on the sustainability of grass biomethane , 2011 .

[45]  J. C. Converse,et al.  Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes , 1986 .

[46]  Monika Heiermann,et al.  Batch- and Semi-continuous Biogas Production from Different Grass Species , 2005 .

[47]  Rafael Borja,et al.  Influence of organic volumetric loading rate, nutrient balance and alkalinity:COD ratio on the anaerobic sludge granulation of an UASB reactor treating sugar cane molasses , 1998 .

[48]  W. Beverloo,et al.  Physical characterization of anaerobic granular sludge. , 1986 .