Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND Dual-antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine is a cornerstone of treatment to prevent thrombotic complications of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS To compare prasugrel, a new thienopyridine, with clopidogrel, we randomly assigned 13,608 patients with moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention to receive prasugrel (a 60-mg loading dose and a 10-mg daily maintenance dose) or clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and a 75-mg daily maintenance dose), for 6 to 15 months. The primary efficacy end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The key safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS The primary efficacy end point occurred in 12.1% of patients receiving clopidogrel and 9.9% of patients receiving prasugrel (hazard ratio for prasugrel vs. clopidogrel, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.90; P<0.001). We also found significant reductions in the prasugrel group in the rates of myocardial infarction (9.7% for clopidogrel vs. 7.4% for prasugrel; P<0.001), urgent target-vessel revascularization (3.7% vs. 2.5%; P<0.001), and stent thrombosis (2.4% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001). Major bleeding was observed in 2.4% of patients receiving prasugrel and in 1.8% of patients receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.68; P=0.03). Also greater in the prasugrel group was the rate of life-threatening bleeding (1.4% vs. 0.9%; P=0.01), including nonfatal bleeding (1.1% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio, 1.25; P=0.23) and fatal bleeding (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS In patients with acute coronary syndromes with scheduled percutaneous coronary intervention, prasugrel therapy was associated with significantly reduced rates of ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, but with an increased risk of major bleeding, including fatal bleeding. Overall mortality did not differ significantly between treatment groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097591 [ClinicalTrials.gov].)

[1]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel Compared With High Loading– and Maintenance–Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial , 2007, Circulation.

[2]  A. Gori,et al.  Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Susan Smyth,et al.  Aspirin dose for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. , 2007, JAMA.

[4]  Ralph D'Agostino,et al.  Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  K. Winters,et al.  A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. , 2007, American heart journal.

[6]  F. Neumann,et al.  Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  E. Antman,et al.  Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by optimizing platelet InhibitioN with prasugrel Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). , 2006, American heart journal.

[8]  G. Montalescot,et al.  A randomized comparison of high clopidogrel loading doses in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: the ALBION (Assessment of the Best Loading Dose of Clopidogrel to Blunt Platelet Activation, Inflammation and Ongoing Necrosis) trial. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2006, European heart journal.

[10]  K. Kent,et al.  Clopidogrel loading dose (300 versus 600 mg) strategies for patients with stable angina pectoris subjected to percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Lippincott Williams Wilkins,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI Practice Guidelines, February 21, 2006 , 2006 .

[12]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Circulation.

[13]  Joseph P Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 guideline update for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  K. Alexander,et al.  Excess dosing of antiplatelet and antithrombin agents in the treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. , 2005, JAMA.

[15]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Absorption, Metabolization, and Antiplatelet Effects of 300-, 600-, and 900-mg Loading Doses of Clopidogrel: Results of the ISAR-CHOICE (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Choose Between 3 High Oral Doses for Immediate Clopidogrel Effect) Trial , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  R. Collins,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45 852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[18]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  [Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions]. , 2005, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel (CS-747, LY640315), a Novel Thienopyridine P2Y12 Antagonist, With Clopidogrel in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the Joint Utilization of Medications to Block Platelets Optimally (JUMBO)–TIMI 26 Trial , 2005, Circulation.

[20]  V. Pasceri,et al.  Randomized Trial of High Loading Dose of Clopidogrel for Reduction of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study* , 2005, Circulation.

[21]  J. Jakubowski,et al.  Pharmacology of CS-747 (prasugrel, LY640315), a novel, potent antiplatelet agent with in vivo P2Y12 receptor antagonist activity. , 2005, Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis.

[22]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2005, European heart journal.

[23]  A. Skene,et al.  Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  R. Harrington.  “Randomized Trial of High Loading Dose of Clopidogrel for Reduction of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study” , 2005 .

[26]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Benefits and Risks of the Combination of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Surgical Revascularization for Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Clopidogrel in Unstable angina to prevent Recurrent ischemic Events (CURE) Trial , 2004, Circulation.

[27]  H. Diener,et al.  Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[28]  H. Hod,et al.  Clopidogrel Resistance Is Associated With Increased Risk of Recurrent Atherothrombotic Events in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Circulation.

[29]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Durability of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[30]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Short- and long-term oral antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  Eric J Topol,et al.  Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[32]  A. Mattioli,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  Catherine Sudlow,et al.  Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al.  EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .

[36]  C. Cannon.  Learning from the Recently Completed Oral Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Antagonist Trials , 2000, Clinical cardiology.

[37]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[38]  R. Califf,et al.  Stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes: incidence and outcomes in the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in unstable angina. Receptor suppression using integrilin therapy (PURSUIT) trial. The PURSUIT Investigators. , 1999, Circulation.

[39]  M. Israel.  Significance of occult gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulation therapy , 1988 .

[40]  J. Lamont,et al.  Significance of occult gastrointestinal bleeding during anticoagulation therapy. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[41]  WARFARIN-INDUCED RECTAL BLEEDING AS CLUE TO COLON CANCER , 1984, The Lancet.