A unified setting for various models of automated material flow and production systems

Abstract A conceptual framework is proposed for the description of discrete-event models of material flow and production systems. It is built in accordance with the traditional view of systems as a set of related objects. Objects express resources, and relations define activities. Various models can be described by the way the state-transition mapping is specified, such as stochastic queuing networks, event-graphs, Petri nets, and discrete-event simulation models. The proposed setting may help building consistent models at various stages of the design of a manufacturing system, and can be used as a basis for a tutorial presentation of existing approaches.

[1]  Ernest Koenigsberg,et al.  Invariance Properties Of Queueing Networks And Their Application To Computer/Communications Systems , 1981 .

[2]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  KBS: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Flexible Simulation , 1982 .

[3]  J. Quadrat,et al.  A linear-system-theoretic view of discrete-event processes , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Jr. Mikell P. Groover Automation, production systems, and computer-aided manufacturing , 1980 .

[5]  Rajan Suri,et al.  Robustness of queuing network formulas , 1983, JACM.

[6]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Product Form and Local Balance in Queueing Networks , 1977, JACM.

[7]  G. Bel,et al.  Modélisation et simulation de systèmes automatisés de production , 1985 .

[8]  James J. Solberg,et al.  Capacity Planning with a Stochastic Workflow Model , 1981 .

[9]  Aimo Törn,et al.  Simulation Graphs: a General Tool for Modeling Simulation Designs , 1981 .

[10]  Richard Hildebrant Scheduling flexible machining systems using mean value analysis , 1980, 1980 19th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes.

[11]  Philip J. Kiviat DIGITAL COMPUTER SIMULATION: COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES , 1969 .

[12]  P. Ramadge,et al.  Supervision of discrete event processes , 1982, 1982 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[13]  Stanley B. Gershwin,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Three-Stage Transfer Lines with Unreliable Machines and Finite Buffers , 1983, Oper. Res..

[14]  Richard E. Nance Model Representation in Discrete Event Simulation: The Conical Methodology , 1981 .

[15]  G. S. Fishman Principles of Discrete Event Simulation , 1978 .

[16]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Using Petri nets to represent production processes , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[17]  A. Alan B. Pritsker,et al.  Gasp iv simulation language , 1974 .

[18]  Stephen C. Mathewson,et al.  Simulation program generators , 1974 .

[19]  H. Markowitz,et al.  THE SIMSCRIPT II PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE , 1970 .

[20]  James Lyle Peterson,et al.  Petri net theory and the modeling of systems , 1981 .

[21]  C. Ramchandani,et al.  Analysis of asynchronous concurrent systems by timed petri nets , 1974 .

[22]  Christos G. Cassandras,et al.  A new approach to the analysis of discrete event dynamic systems , 1983, Autom..

[23]  R. A. Cuninghame-Green,et al.  Describing Industrial Processes with Interference and Approximating Their Steady-State Behaviour , 1962 .

[24]  Alan J. Mayne,et al.  Introduction to Simulation and SLAM , 1979 .

[25]  Antony Unwin,et al.  Modeling and Analysis Using Q-GERT Networks , 1977 .

[26]  K. L. Hitz Scheduling of flexible flowshops , 1979 .

[27]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Heuristic methods based on mean-value analysis for flexible manufacturing systems performance evaluation , 1982, 1982 21st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.