SMART 2013: Lessons learned from the international benchmark about the seismic margin assessment of nuclear RC buildings

Abstract In this paper, the main findings and conclusions drawn from the second international benchmark named SMART 2013 and jointly organized by the French Sustainable Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) and Electricite De France (EDF) within the framework of a wide research program entitled “Seismic design and best-estimate Methods Assessment for Reinforced concrete buildings subjected to Torsion and nonlinear effects” (SMART) are presented. A 1:4-scaled reinforced concrete (RC) specimen, representing a part of a nuclear auxiliary building and designed according to French guidelines for a PGA level equal to 0.2 g, was subjected to shaking table tests; results of this experimental campaign are used as reference data for this benchmark. The input ground motions considered in the seismic loading sequence are mainly natural bi-axial signals (main shock and aftershock) recorded during the Northridge earthquake that took place in California, USA in 1994 and have a PGA (Peak Ground Acceleration) about 1.8 g. These high-intensity seismic loadings allow assessing the relevancy of nonlinear numerical models when they have to deal with strong nonlinearities due to concrete cracking. The results produced by the 42 teams which participated in the international benchmark show that (i) the dynamic behavior of the specimen is well captured when dealing with the design level, (ii) the displacement are underestimated when dealing with the beyond design behavior, (iii) the peak frequency shifts are well captured and (iv) the damaging effect of the Northridge aftershock is almost null. Last, seismic safety margins of the specimen are quantified by two mechanical indicators; the results confirm the fact that the RC specimen which was designed according to the codes applicable in the French nuclear industry, exhibits noticeable good performance level regarding collapse prevention.

[1]  I. Zentner Numerical computation of fragility curves for NPP equipment , 2010 .

[2]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  SMART 2013: Experimental and numerical assessment of the dynamic behavior by shaking table tests of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure subjected to high intensity ground motions , 2016 .

[3]  Marco De Biasio,et al.  A Simple and Efficient Intensity Measure to Account for Nonlinear Structural Behavior , 2014 .

[4]  A. Altinyollar,et al.  Conclusions of an IAEA–JRC research project on the safety significance of near-field seismic motions , 2011 .

[5]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling , 2000 .

[6]  Panagiotis Kotronis,et al.  Numerical modelling of the seismic behaviour of a 7-story building: NEES benchmark , 2009 .

[7]  M. Menegotto Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R. C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-Elastic Behavior of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending , 1973 .

[8]  A. C. Heidebrecht,et al.  Development and application of a displacement-based design approach for moment-resisting frame structures , 2019 .

[9]  Nicolae Ile,et al.  NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALL UNDER EARTHQUAKE LOADING , 2000 .

[10]  M. Ueda Nonlinear Analysis on RC Shear Wall Shaking Table Test , 1997 .

[11]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Lessons Learned from Seismic Analysis of a Seven-Story Concrete Test Building , 2010 .

[12]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  SMART 2008: Shaking table tests on an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure and seismic margins assessment , 2015 .

[13]  René de Borst,et al.  Discrete vs smeared crack models for concrete fracture: bridging the gap , 2004 .

[14]  A. Huespe,et al.  From continuum mechanics to fracture mechanics: the strong discontinuity approach , 2002 .

[15]  Benjamin Richard,et al.  SMART 2008: Overview, synthesis and lessons learned from the International Benchmark , 2016 .

[16]  E. Field,et al.  Nonlinear ground-motion amplification by sediments during the 1994 Northridge earthquake , 1997, Nature.

[17]  Filip C. Filippou,et al.  Simulation of the shaking table test of a seven‐story shear wall building , 2009 .

[18]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Shake-Table Test of a Full-Scale 7-Story Building Slice. Phase I: Rectangular Wall , 2011 .

[19]  K. Akino,et al.  Report on seismic shear wall international standard problem organized by OECD/NEA/CSNI , 1997 .

[20]  Danièle Chauvel,et al.  CEOS.fr experimental programme and reference specimen tests results , 2014 .

[21]  Trevor Kelly,et al.  A BLIND PREDICTION TEST OF NONLINEAR ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE SHEAR WALLS , 2007 .