A fuzzy system to support the configuration of baggage screening devices at an airport

We model baggage screening devices at an airport to evaluate their effectiveness.Fuzzy inference system to assist airport security manager was built.Evaluation of single X-ray device as well as entire equipment is possible.TIP images number and frequency influence the evaluation of the security system.Device's replacement strategy was evaluated for EPKT airport. An airport is a complex engineering system; it is composed of many elements interconnected with numerous internal relations with a strongly pronounced role of the human factor. One of the specific tasks carried out by the airport managing entity (AME) is to configure the airport security system (ApSS) so that to attain the expected level of confidence in the airport safety and security. This task consists in selection of infrastructure, technical equipment, allocation of personnel and financial means that are necessary to perform all functions of the ApSS. One of the aspects of the configuration of the ApSS is the allocation of available X-ray baggage screening devices searching for items prohibited for transportation. To make this allocation, we need to know how effective these devices are (in terms of detecting prohibited items). This assessment is dependent on several factors which are treated as linguistic variables and are input to fuzzy inference system: the ability to detect explosives, the number of detection lines, the effectiveness of the TIP (Threat Image Projection) system and the age of the machine. Some of these elements are difficult to objective assessment, as they are heavily dependent on the human factor or the information is uncertain or incomplete. So fuzzy ApSS analysis is proposed. The output from the fuzzy inference system is linguistic variable Device evaluation. The meaning of this variable is the ability to protect the aircraft against prohibited items. The proposed new method of assessing the airport baggage screening system involves the construction of a hierarchical fuzzy inference system. The usefulness of the method is exemplified for Katowice-Pyrzowice International Airport, for which an assessment of devices has been performed. The results show that not only allocation of specific devices for specific control points is important for the security of passengers. Also important are the locally accepted principles of their work, which so far are not specified by international regulations. This applies for instance to the selection of the number and frequency of TIP images. Experiments show that the proposed approach can be effective as part of an expert system for supporting the airport operator in configuring ApSS.

[1]  Paul P. Wu,et al.  A review of models and model usage scenarios for an airport complex system , 2013 .

[2]  Paul P. Wu,et al.  Scenarios for a complex systems airport modelling framework , 2013 .

[3]  Solomon Wong,et al.  Evolving risk-based security: A review of current issues and emerging trends impacting security screening in the aviation industry , 2015 .

[4]  Chieh-Yuan Tsai,et al.  A decision rules approach for improvement of airport service quality , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Increasing X-ray image interpretation competency of cargo security screeners , 2014 .

[7]  Aziz Moukrim,et al.  A Memetic Algorithm for staff scheduling problem in airport security service , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Fred L. Mannering,et al.  A hazard-based analysis of airport security transit times , 2013 .

[9]  Jin-Han Park,et al.  Extension of the VIKOR method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information , 2011, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[10]  Coen Van Gulijk,et al.  Trusting technology: Security decision making at airports , 2012 .

[11]  Jacek Skorupski A fuzzy system for evaluation of baggage screening devices at an airport , 2014 .

[12]  Ilker Akgun,et al.  Fuzzy integrated vulnerability assessment model for critical facilities in combating the terrorism , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  Bo van der Rhee,et al.  Virtual queuing at airport security lanes , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  Fuzzy inference system for the efficiency assessment of hold baggage security control at the airport , 2015 .

[15]  O. Wetter,et al.  Imaging in airport security: Past, present, future, and the link to forensic and clinical radiology , 2013 .

[16]  Ryszard S. Michalski,et al.  Learning symbolic descriptions of shape for object recognition in X-ray images , 1997 .

[17]  Xiaofeng Nie Risk-based grouping for checked baggage screening systems , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  A fuzzy reasoning system for evaluating the efficiency of cabin baggage screening at airports , 2015 .

[19]  Jeffrey C. Price,et al.  Practical Aviation Security: Predicting and Preventing Future Threats , 2008 .

[20]  Tamara L. Ansons,et al.  Airport security measures and their influence on enplanement intentions: Responses from leisure travelers attending a Canadian University , 2014 .

[21]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  An interactive method for multiple criteria group decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and its application to medical decision making , 2013, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[22]  D. Gillen,et al.  Aviation security: Costing, pricing, finance and performance , 2015 .

[23]  Brian A. Jackson,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Layered Security for Protecting the Aviation System Against Adaptive Adversaries , 2015 .

[24]  F. Mannering,et al.  Airport Security Screening and Changing Passenger Satisfaction: An Exploratory Assessment , 2006 .

[25]  Kenneth Pettersen,et al.  Organizational contradictions between safety and security – Perceived challenges and ways of integrating critical infrastructure protection in civil aviation , 2015 .

[26]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Micaela Demichela,et al.  Risk assessment techniques for civil aviation security , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty with application to air traffic safety , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  K Wells,et al.  A review of X-ray explosives detection techniques for checked baggage. , 2012, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[30]  Jacek Skorupski,et al.  A fuzzy model for evaluating airport security screeners' work , 2015 .

[31]  Jacek Skorupski Automatic verification of a knowledge base by using a multi-criteria group evaluation with application to security screening at an airport , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[32]  M. Fouladirad A. Grall,et al.  Other reliability and safety areas Volatility regime switching and jump-diffusion process for prognosis: Case of equity price modeling , 2014 .

[33]  Didier Dubois,et al.  On the relevance of non-standard theories of uncertainty in modeling and pooling expert opinions , 1992 .

[34]  Arthur Gerstenfeld,et al.  A decision-analysis approach for optimal airport security , 2011, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..