Atoms Want to Be Free Too! Expanding the Critique of Intellectual Property to Physical Goods

“Atoms are the new bits”. That is the latest buzz arising from the Californian trade press. What do we get when this dictum is sampled with the old rallying cry: “Information wants to be free”? We suggest that the predominant, bounded critique of intellectual property is thereby destabilised. Constitutive of that critique was the exceptionality attributed to information goods (bits) vis-a-vis tangible goods (atoms). It was thus intellectual property could be presented as something altogether different from private property. We recognise that this way of framing the issue has had tactical advantages, but contend that it has stood in the way of a deeper understanding of what intellectual property is. When the critique of proprietary software is expanded by an emerging movement for open hardware development, however, the boundary between intellectual property and property as such crumbles. This enables us to renew our critique of the political economy of information.

[1]  N. Xenos Scarcity and Modernity , 1989 .

[2]  Tiziana Terranova Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy , 2000 .

[3]  Rubin Patterson,et al.  Cutting Edge: Technology, Information, Capitalism and Social Revolution , 1999 .

[4]  N. K. Hayles Boundary Disputes: Homeostasis, Reflexivity, and the Foundations of Cybernetics , 1994 .

[5]  A. Young Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[6]  Dan Schiller,et al.  How to think about information , 2006 .

[7]  V. Mosco political economy of communication , 1996 .

[8]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[9]  C. Jooss Self-organization of Matter , 2020 .

[10]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[11]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[12]  J. Mill Principles of Political Economy , 2011, Forerunners of Realizable Values Accounting in Financial Reporting.

[13]  Adrian Bowyer,et al.  The intellectual property implications of low-cost 3D printing , 2010 .

[14]  F. Foldvary The Lighthouse as a Private-Sector Collective Good. , 2003 .

[15]  M. Lamont,et al.  The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences , 2002 .

[16]  Daniel B. Klein,et al.  The half-life of policy rationales: How new technology affects old policy issues , 2002 .

[17]  M. Sahlins Stone Age Economics , 2020 .

[18]  K. Marx Capital: A Critique of Political Economy , 1867 .

[19]  Serge Proulx,et al.  Mapping the Virtual in Social Sciences: On the Category of "Virtual Community" , 2005, J. Community Informatics.

[20]  F. E. Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[21]  David K. Levine,et al.  Against Intellectual Monopoly , 2008 .

[22]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[23]  Robin Mansell,et al.  Political Economy, Power and New Media , 2004, New Media Soc..

[24]  Stewart Brand,et al.  The media lab: inventing the future at MIT , 1988 .

[25]  Michael Hardt,et al.  Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire , 2004 .

[26]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[27]  B. McCarl,et al.  Economics , 1870, The Indian medical gazette.

[28]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[29]  R. Stallman Did You Say ‘Intellectual Property’? It's a Seductive Mirage , 2006 .

[30]  Gabriella Coleman The Political Agnosticism of Free and Open Source Software and the Inadvertent Politics of Contrast , 2004 .

[31]  J. Barlow A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace , 2021, Commonplace.

[32]  Information and Knowledge , 2005 .

[33]  J. Söderberg,et al.  When all that is theory melts into (hot) air: Contrasts and parallels between actor network theory, autonomist Marxism, and open Marxism ∗ , 2010 .

[34]  Fritz Machlup,et al.  Knowledge : its creation, distribution, and economic significance , 1980 .

[35]  Greg Lastowka,et al.  The Laws of the Virtual Worlds , 2004 .

[36]  Paolo Virno,et al.  Notes on the ‘General Intellect’ , 1996 .

[37]  Ronald H. Coase,et al.  The Lighthouse in Economics , 1974, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[38]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[39]  Rafael Capurro,et al.  Past, present, and future of the concept of information , 2009 .

[40]  Igor Kopytoff The social life of things: The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process , 1986 .

[41]  D. Camfield,et al.  The Multitude and the Kangaroo: A Critique of Hardt and Negri's Theory of Immaterial Labour , 2007 .

[42]  A. Daoud Scarcity, Abundance and Sufficiency: Contributions to Social and Economic Theory , 2011 .