The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.

Screening mammography is one of the most challenging radiological techniques and this is partly due to the difficulty in detecting microcalcifications (MCs) against an anatomical background of varying mammographic tissue density. Further complicating factors in the detection of MCs include the small size and their resemblance to other bright structures in the breast. A number of different microcalcification simulating materials are available and these are often incorporated in test objects used to study some aspects of an imaging system, for example, optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. Aluminum (Al) has similar x-ray attenuation properties to MCs and therefore Al is extensively used in test objects. However, to the best of our knowledge, the suitability of Al as a substitute material for MCs has not been studied explicitly. The aim of this study was therefore to demonstrate that spectral optimization studies for MCs can be performed with Al sheets. The approach used was twofold. First, contrasts generated by Al and MCs at several exposure settings were compared, and secondly an optimization study was performed with both Al and MCs as the contrasting target using an amorphous selenium (a-Se) based digital mammography unit. Specimens from stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies of non-palpable lesions with mammographic evidence of MCs were obtained from clinical routine patients. Contrasts generated by these MCs and by Al sheets were measured for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations, for different polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) thicknesses at the extremes of the x-ray tube voltages used clinically. A linear regression was then applied between the two measurements of contrast; the ratio of the angular coefficient q obtained from the fitted regression lines for Al and MCs ranged from 0.96 to 0.99 for Mo/Mo and Mo/Rh combinations at 2 and 4 cm PMMA, respectively, and from 0.83 at 4 cm PMMA to 1.14 at 7 cm PMMA for the W/Rh combination. For the optimization study, the signal-difference-to-noise ratio (SDNR) measured using the MCs was plotted as a function of mean glandular dose (MGD) for 4 cm PMMA, for the three different anode/filter combinations. The W/Rh combination always gave the highest SDNR for a given MGD. The SDNR and MGD were then used to define the common figure of merit SNR(2)/MGD; the setting that maximized this measure at 4 cm PMMA was 27 kV and a W/Rh combination. These results demonstrate a close correspondence between the attenuation properties of Al and extracted MC material over the energy range studied for the Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh and W/Rh anode/filter combinations. Furthermore, it was found that the exposure parameters that maximized the figure of merit for the MC specimen agree with results found in studies that used Al sheets as a substitute for the MC.

[1]  G Hermann,et al.  Occult malignant breast lesions in 114 patients: relationship to age and the presence of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[2]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms. , 2004, Medical physics.

[3]  Walter Huda,et al.  Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system , 2006, European Radiology.

[5]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  L Desponds,et al.  Image quality index (IQI) for screen-film mammography. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R Fahrig,et al.  Optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography: dependence on anode material, breast thickness, and lesion type. , 1994, Medical physics.

[8]  A Fandos-Morera,et al.  Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[9]  K. Robson.  A parametric method for determining mammographic X-ray tube output and half value layer. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  D R Dance,et al.  Calculation of dose and contrast for two mammographic grids. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Kerry T. Krugh,et al.  Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[13]  A. Bremond,et al.  Different types of microcalcifications observed in breast pathology , 1987, Virchows Archiv A.

[14]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  X-ray spectrum optimization of full-field digital mammography: simulation and phantom study. , 2006, Medical physics.

[15]  H Bosmans,et al.  Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  M Le Gal,et al.  [Diagnostic value of clustered microcalcifications discovered by mammography (apropos of 227 cases with histological verification and without a palpable breast tumor)]. , 1984, Bulletin du cancer.

[17]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Optimal radiographic techniques for digital mammograms obtained with an amorphous selenium detector , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  M. Boudeulle,et al.  Structure and composition of microcalcifications in benign and malignant lesions of the breast: study by light microscopy, transmission and scanning electron microscopy, microprobe analysis, and X-ray diffraction. , 1984, Human pathology.

[19]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography. , 2009, Medical physics.

[20]  Elsa Arribas,et al.  Visibility of simulated microcalcifications--a hardcopy-based comparison of three mammographic systems. , 2005, Medical physics.

[21]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Contrast visibility of simulated microcalcifications in full field mammography systems , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography. , 2008, Medical physics.

[23]  D R Dance,et al.  Influence of anode/filter material and tube potential on contrast, signal-to-noise ratio and average absorbed dose in mammography: a Monte Carlo study. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  R Fahrig,et al.  A model for optimization of spectral shape in digital mammography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[25]  A R Cowen,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Gary R Cutter,et al.  Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose. , 2003, Medical physics.