Changes in the pelvic anatomy after an IMRT treatment fraction of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE To quantify the three-dimensional variations of pelvic anatomy after a single treatment fraction. METHODS AND MATERIALS Forty-six prostate cancer patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scanning with an in-room CT-on-rail system, before and immediately after one intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) session. To study the soft-tissue anatomy changes, the pre- and post-treatment CT images were registered using the bony structure with an in-house image registration software system. The center of volume for both the prostate and seminal vesicles was used to assess the relative displacement of the same structure after the treatment fraction. RESULTS During one treatment fraction (21 +/- 4 min), both the prostate and seminal vesicles showed statistically significant systematic trends in the superior and anterior directions of the patient's anatomy. The net increase in bladder volume was huge (127 +/- 79 cm(3)), yet this change did not translate into large target displacements. Although the population mean displacements in either direction were 1.3 +/- 2.9 mm for the prostate and 1.2 +/- 4.1 mm for the seminal vesicles in the anterior direction, a few patients had displacements as large as 8.4 mm and 15.6 mm, respectively. These large displacements correlated strongly (p < 0.001) with large rectal volume increases caused by gaseous build-up in the rectum. CONCLUSION The observed intrafraction variations in anatomy during prostate IMRT sessions suggest that, for any given fraction, the organ motion and volume changes can potentially lead to compromised target coverage in about 15% of patients in whom the prostate position shifted >4 mm.

[1]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Lei Dong,et al.  Automatic registration of the prostate for computed-tomography-guided radiotherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J A Antolak,et al.  Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  John T. Wei,et al.  Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Tsai,et al.  Implementation and utility of a daily ultrasound-based localization system with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Daily CT localization for correcting portal errors in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Chee-Wai Cheng,et al.  Clinical implementation of the world's first Primatom, a combination of CT scanner and linear accelerator, for precise tumor targeting and treatment , 2001 .

[12]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  M. Eble,et al.  Prostate position variability and dose-volume histograms in radiotherapy for prostate cancer with full and empty bladder. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  Lei Dong,et al.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Evaluation of ultrasound-based prostate localization for image-guided radiotherapy. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  H Shirato,et al.  Use of an implanted marker and real-time tracking of the marker for the positioning of prostate and bladder cancers. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Lisa Grimm,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT-linear accelerator combination: prostate movements and dosimetric considerations. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J C Stroom,et al.  Detection of internal organ movement in prostate cancer patients using portal images. , 2000, Medical physics.

[22]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Evaluation of mechanical precision and alignment uncertainties for an integrated CT/LINAC system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[23]  Marcel van Herk,et al.  Quantification of shape variation of prostate and seminal vesicles during external beam radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Implementation and validation of a three-dimensional deformable registration algorithm for targeted prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  Lei Dong,et al.  Experience of ultrasound-based daily prostate localization. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  J Pouliot,et al.  Electronic portal imaging device detection of radioopaque markers for the evaluation of prostate position during megavoltage irradiation: a clinical study. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  T. Byrne,et al.  A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 2005, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.