Sampling variance of species identification in fisheries-acoustic surveys based on automated procedures associating acoustic images and trawl hauls

During the acoustic surveys of fish stocks, a small number of echo traces are identified to species by fishing. During data analysis, the process of echogram scrutiny leads to allocating echo-trace backscattered energies to species. While the precision of survey estimates is generally based on the spatial variation in the energy, no variance term accounts for species identification and energy allocation. In this paper, the sampling variance of species identification is developed and automated procedures are used allowing energy allocation to be carried out by a non-expert. The procedures are based on the fact that at the sampling stage trawl hauls are linked with particular acoustic images. The procedures have two steps: the classification step corresponds to species identification and the aggregation step to energy allocation. Classification is performed on the identified images and results in defining groups of images and estimating in each the sampling variability of the species identification. Aggregation is performed on non-identified images and results in post-stratifying the data. The estimation (map, abundance and variance per species) is then derived automatically and is conditioned by the post-stratification. Two approaches are followed, one based on the echo-trace characteristics making full use of the echogram (acoustic-image classification) and the other on the spatial continuity of the species composition between trawl hauls (trawl-haul classification). These methods are described and compared. The species-identification variance term is also compared to the spatial variance.

[1]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Standard protocols for the analysis of school based data from echo sounder surveys , 2000 .

[2]  T. R. Hammond,et al.  A general procedure for estimating the composition of fish school clusters using standard acoustic survey data , 2001 .

[3]  Alain Hillion,et al.  Narrowband acoustic identification of monospecific fish shoals , 1996 .

[4]  David G. Reid,et al.  Image Analysis Techniques for the Study of Fish School Structure from Acoustic Survey Data , 1993 .

[5]  Noël Diner,et al.  MOVIES-B: an acoustic detection description software. Application to shoal species' classification , 1993 .

[6]  Noël Diner,et al.  Correction on school geometry and density: approach based on acoustic image simulation , 2001 .

[7]  Jacques Masse,et al.  Acoustic detection of the spatial and temporal distribution of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay , 1993 .

[8]  Hsueh-Jung Lu,et al.  Species identification of fish shoals from echograms by an echo-signal image processing system , 1995 .

[9]  W. C. Leggett,et al.  Hydroacoustic Signal Classification of Fish Schools by Species , 1988 .

[10]  S. Georgakarakos,et al.  Artificial neural networks as a tool for species identification of fish schools , 1996 .

[11]  François Gerlotto Identification and spatial stratification of tropical fish concentrations using acoustic populations , 1993 .

[12]  L. Lebart,et al.  Statistique exploratoire multidimensionnelle , 1995 .

[13]  Robert Kieser,et al.  Classification of Fish Assemblages based on Echo Integration Surveys , 1991 .

[14]  J. Simmonds,et al.  Species identification using wideband backscatter with neural network and discriminant analysis , 1996 .

[15]  J. Masse,et al.  Effect of number of transects and identification hauls on acoustic biomass estimates under mixed species conditions , 1995 .

[16]  Jacques Masse,et al.  Acoustic observations in the Bay of Biscay: Schooling, vertical distribution, species assemblages and behaviour , 1996 .

[17]  Pierre Petitgas,et al.  Spatial organization of pelagic fish: echogram structure, spatio-temporal condition, and biomass in Senegalese waters , 1996 .

[18]  M. Barangé,et al.  Species identification of pelagic fish schools on the South African continental shelf using acoustic descriptors and ancillary information , 2001 .