Reactor core power mapping based on Bayesian inference

Abstract Bayesian inference provides a coherent probabilistic approach for combining information from measurements of in-core neutron detectors and numerical neutronics simulation results, and thus is an appropriate framework for reactor core power mapping which has been implemented in this paper. Measurements from DayaBay Unit 1 PWR are used to verify the accuracy of the Bayesian inference method, and comparisons are made among the Bayesian inference method, the Kalman filter method and the very-often-used coupling coefficients method. The root mean square errors (RMSE), the maximum relative errors (MRE), and the power peak reconstruction error (PPRE) of the Bayesian inference method are less than 0.31%, 1.64% and 0.07% for the entire operating cycle separately. The reconstructed assembly power distribution results and the calculation speed show that the Bayesian inference method is a promising candidate for on-line core power distribution monitoring system.

[1]  Samuel Buis,et al.  Use of 3D-VAR and Kalman Filter Approaches for Neutronic State and Parameter Estimation in Nuclear Reactors , 2007 .

[2]  Chang Hyo Kim,et al.  The Least-Squares Method for Three-Dimensional Core Power Distribution Monitoring in Pressurized Water Reactors , 2003 .

[3]  Kan Wang,et al.  A new power mapping method based on ordinary kriging and determination of optimal detector location strategy , 2014 .

[4]  Man Gyun Na,et al.  On-line Generation of Three-Dimensional Core Power Distribution Using Incore Detector Signals to Monitor Safety Limits , 2004 .

[5]  Ping Yang,et al.  On-line reconstruction of in-core power distribution by harmonics expansion method , 2011 .

[6]  C. F. Karlson,et al.  Continuing advancements in in-core power distribution measurement methods using SIMULATE-3 AND CECOR 3.4 , 1995 .

[7]  Tomasz Kozlowski,et al.  Kriging-based inverse uncertainty quantification of nuclear fuel performance code BISON fission gas release model using time series measurement data , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Dong Li,et al.  Investigation of uncertainty quantification method for BE models using MCMC approach and application to assessment with FEBA data , 2017 .

[9]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[10]  Jean-Philippe Argaud,et al.  Robustness of nuclear core activity reconstruction by data assimilation , 2010, 1006.0817.

[11]  Raymond J. Webb,et al.  Comparison of CECOR Algorithm to Lagrange Multiplier Method to Estimate Reactor Power Distributions , 2000 .

[12]  Si Hwan Kim,et al.  Application of Cubic Spline Synthesis in On-Line Core Axial Power Distribution Monitoring , 1991 .

[13]  Axel Hoefer,et al.  Improving PWR core simulations by Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis and Bayesian inference , 2016, 1601.08036.