Cognitive and default mode networks support developmental stability in functional connectome fingerprinting through adolescence

Pioneering studies have shown that individual correlation measures from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies can identify another scan from that same individual. This method is known as "connectotyping" or functional connectome "fingerprinting". We analyzed a unique dataset of 12-30 years old (N=140) individuals who had two distinct resting state scans on the same day and again 12-18 months later to assess the sensitivity and specificity of fingerprinting accuracy across different time scales (same day, ~1.5 years apart) and developmental periods (youths, adults). Sensitivity and specificity to identify one9s own scan was high (average AUC=0.94), although it was significantly higher in the same day (average AUC=0.97) than 1.5-year years later (average AUC=0.91). Accuracy in youths (average AUC=0.93) was not significantly different from adults (average AUC=0.96). Multiple statistical methods revealed select connections from the Frontoparietal, Default, and Dorsal Attention networks that enhanced the ability to identify an individual. Identification of these features generalized across datasets and improved fingerprinting accuracy in a longitudinal replication data set (N=208). These results provide a framework for understanding the sensitivity and specificity of fingerprinting accuracy in adolescents and adults at multiple time scales. Importantly, distinct features of one9s "fingerprint" contribute to one9s uniqueness, suggesting that cognitive and default networks play a primary role in the individualization of one9s connectome.

[1]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Defining Individual-Specific Functional Neuroanatomy for Precision Psychiatry , 2019, Biological Psychiatry.

[2]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  The community structure of functional brain networks exhibits scale-specific patterns of inter- and intra-subject variability , 2019, NeuroImage.

[3]  Finnegan J. Calabro,et al.  Development of Hippocampal-Prefrontal Cortex Interactions through Adolescence. , 2019, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Identifying reproducible individual differences in childhood functional brain networks: An ABCD study , 2019, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[5]  Serdar Aslan,et al.  Extraction of the cardiac waveform from simultaneous multislice fMRI data using slice sorted averaging and a deep learning reconstruction filter , 2019, NeuroImage.

[6]  K. Roeder,et al.  Resting-State Functional Network Organization Is Stable Across Adolescent Development for Typical and Psychosis Spectrum Youth. , 2019, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[7]  D. Astle,et al.  The cingulum as a marker of individual differences in neurocognitive development , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[8]  B. Luna,et al.  Age-Associated Deviations of Amygdala Functional Connectivity in Youths With Psychosis Spectrum Disorders: Relevance to Psychotic Symptoms. , 2019, The American journal of psychiatry.

[9]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  The individual functional connectome is unique and stable over months to years , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Phillips,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity correlates of person-level risk for bipolar disorder in offspring of affected parents , 2019, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[11]  B. Luna,et al.  Adolescence as a neurobiological critical period for the development of higher-order cognition , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[12]  Amanda V. Utevsky,et al.  Developmental maturation of the precuneus as a functional core of the default-mode network , 2018, bioRxiv.

[13]  Lars T. Westlye,et al.  Stability of the Brain Functional Connectome Fingerprint in Individuals With Schizophrenia , 2018, JAMA psychiatry.

[14]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Brain Networks Are Dominated by Stable Group and Individual Factors, Not Cognitive or Daily Variation , 2018, Neuron.

[15]  S. Galea,et al.  Precision Medicine from a Public Health Perspective. , 2018, Annual review of public health.

[16]  Dustin Scheinost,et al.  Considering factors affecting the connectome-based identification process: Comment on Waller et al. , 2018, NeuroImage.

[17]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study: Imaging acquisition across 21 sites , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  Oscar Miranda-Dominguez,et al.  Heritability of the human connectome: A connectotyping study , 2017, Network Neuroscience.

[19]  Bart Larsen,et al.  Development of White Matter Microstructure and Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Between the Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex: Associations With Anxiety and Depression , 2017, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  Johann Daniel Kruschwitz,et al.  Evaluating the replicability, specificity, and generalizability of connectome fingerprints , 2017, NeuroImage.

[21]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains , 2017, Neuron.

[22]  O. Andreassen,et al.  Delayed stabilization and individualization in connectome development are related to psychiatric disorders , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  André Zugman,et al.  Commentary: Functional connectome fingerprint: identifying individuals using patterns of brain connectivity , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Full Length Articles , 2022 .

[25]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  The role of experience in adolescent cognitive development: Integration of executive, memory, and mesolimbic systems , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[26]  Joseph Loscalzo,et al.  Precision medicine in cardiology , 2016, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[27]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[28]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Assessing Variations in Areal Organization for the Intrinsic Brain: From Fingerprints to Reliability , 2016, bioRxiv.

[29]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Generation and Evaluation of a Cortical Area Parcellation from Resting-State Correlations. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human , 2015, Nature Communications.

[31]  K. Hwang,et al.  The Contribution of Network Organization and Integration to the Development of Cognitive Control , 2015, PLoS biology.

[32]  M. Chun,et al.  Functional connectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals based on patterns of brain connectivity , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[34]  Bart Larsen,et al.  An integrative model of the maturation of cognitive control. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  Alberto Llera,et al.  ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts from fMRI data , 2015, NeuroImage.

[36]  Maarten Mennes,et al.  Evaluation of ICA-AROMA and alternative strategies for motion artifact removal in resting state fMRI , 2015, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Kümmerli,et al.  Quorum sensing triggers the stochastic escape of individual cells from Pseudomonas putida biofilms , 2015, Nature Communications.

[38]  J. Dukart,et al.  When Structure Affects Function – The Need for Partial Volume Effect Correction in Functional and Resting State Magnetic Resonance Imaging Studies , 2014, PloS one.

[39]  Damien A. Fair,et al.  Connectotyping: Model Based Fingerprinting of the Functional Connectome , 2014, PloS one.

[40]  Eric A Youngstrom,et al.  A primer on receiver operating characteristic analysis and diagnostic efficiency statistics for pediatric psychology: we are ready to ROC. , 2014, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[41]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  The nuisance of nuisance regression: Spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[42]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Groupwise whole-brain parcellation from resting-state fMRI data for network node identification , 2013, NeuroImage.

[43]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview , 2013, NeuroImage.

[44]  K. Hwang,et al.  The development of hub architecture in the human functional brain network. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Vivek Prabhakaran,et al.  The effect of resting condition on resting-state fMRI reliability and consistency: A comparison between resting with eyes open, closed, and fixated , 2013, NeuroImage.

[46]  M. Fox,et al.  Individual Variability in Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[47]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth , 2012, NeuroImage.

[48]  S. Plein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[49]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[50]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI , 2012, NeuroImage.

[51]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[52]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[53]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[54]  T. Paus,et al.  Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  C. Florkowski Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios: communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. , 2008, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[56]  L. Steinberg Cognitive and affective development in adolescence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[58]  A. Glaros,et al.  Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model. , 1988, Journal of clinical psychology.

[59]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.