Improving multistatic MIMO radar performance in data-limited scenarios

A MIMO Multistatic radar system consists of multiple bistatic MIMO pairs working in potentially different configurations. If a bistatic pair in a Multistatic MIMO radar system employs multiple transmit and receive elements, this increases the dimensionality of the data received over a Coherent Processing Interval (CPI), which in turn increases the training data needed to reliably estimate the covariance matrix. This, coupled with the non-stationarity in the received data resulting from the bistatic geometry further degrades the quality of the covariance matrix estimate used in the adaptive detector. In [1], Bell et al. presented a physics based MIMO clutter model, and showed that lack of training data support renders the MIMO radar unfeasible in that the individual bistatic pairs can outperform the overall MIMO system. For these systems, we need to investigate techniques that perform reasonably well in data limited scenarios. In this paper, we show that the physics based clutter model presented in [1] can be approximated as an AR process of model order 4. This has implications for the amount of data that is needed to reliably estimate the AR parameters. For the purpose of this discussion, we use the optimum AR coefficients for every model order generated using the clairvoyant clutter covariance matrix, and characterize the performance using two metrics: SINR loss, and the probability of detection as a function of SINR.

[1]  James H. Michels A Parametric Detection Approach Using Multichannel Processes , 1989 .

[2]  D.E. Bowyer,et al.  Adaptive Clutter Filtering Using Autogressive Spectral Estimation , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Modeling and simulation for multistatic coherent MIMO radar , 2013, 2013 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon13).

[4]  Daniel W. Bliss,et al.  MIMO Radar Waveform Constraints for GMTI , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[5]  P. Stoica,et al.  MIMO Radar Signal Processing , 2008 .

[6]  M. Rangaswamy,et al.  A parametric multichannel detection algorithm for correlated non-Gaussian random processes , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE National Radar Conference.

[7]  Raviraj S. Adve,et al.  Space-Time Adaptive Processing , 1998 .

[8]  Hongbin Li,et al.  Moving Target Detection Using Distributed MIMO Radar in Clutter With Nonhomogeneous Power , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[9]  L.J. Cimini,et al.  MIMO Radar with Widely Separated Antennas , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[10]  James Ward,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar , 1994, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[11]  Jian Li,et al.  MIMO Radar with Colocated Antennas , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[12]  James Ward,et al.  Space-time adaptive processing for airborne radar , 1998 .

[13]  Braham Himed,et al.  Beam control using the parametric adaptive matched filter STAP approach , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Radar Conference (Cat. No. 03CH37474).

[14]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[15]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Spatial Diversity in Radars—Models and Detection Performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Daniel W. Bliss,et al.  Clutter covariance matrices for GMTI MIMO radar , 2010, 2010 Conference Record of the Forty Fourth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[17]  Qingwen Zhang,et al.  Parametric adaptive matched filter for airborne radar applications , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..