Multidisciplinary Ophthalmic Imaging Individual A-scan Signal Normalization between Two Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Devices

PURPOSE We developed a method to normalize optical coherence tomography (OCT) signal profiles from two spectral-domain (SD) OCT devices so that the comparability between devices increases. METHODS We scanned 21 eyes from 14 healthy and 7 glaucoma subjects with two SD-OCT devices on the same day, with equivalent cube scan patterns centered on the fovea (Cirrus HD-OCT and RTVue). Foveola positions were selected manually and used as the center for registration of the corresponding images. A-scan signals were sampled 1.8 mm from the foveola in the temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior quadrants. After oversampling and rescaling RTVue data along the Z-axis to match the corresponding Cirrus data format, speckle noise reduction and amplitude normalization were applied. For comparison between normalized A-scan profiles, mean absolute difference in amplitude in percentage was measured at each sampling point. As a reference, the mean absolute difference between two Cirrus scans on the same eye also was measured. RESULTS The mean residual of the A-scan profile amplitude was reduced significantly after signal normalization (12.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.0001, paired t-test). All four quadrants also showed statistically significant reduction (all P < 0.0001). Mean absolute difference after normalization was smaller than the one between two Cirrus scans. No performance difference was detected between health and glaucomatous eyes. CONCLUSIONS The reported signal normalization method successfully reduced the A-scan profile differences between two SD-OCT devices. This signal normalization processing may improve the direct comparability of OCT image analysis and measurement on various devices.

[1]  Wolfgang Drexler,et al.  State-of-the-art retinal optical coherence tomography , 2008, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[2]  Johannes F de Boer,et al.  RPE-normalized RNFL attenuation coefficient maps derived from volumetric OCT imaging for glaucoma assessment. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: history, current status, and laboratory work. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Kia-Chong Chua,et al.  Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurement Between 2 Spectral Domain OCT Instruments , 2012, Journal of glaucoma.

[5]  C Ross Ethier,et al.  Shadow removal and contrast enhancement in optical coherence tomography images of the human optic nerve head. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Yijun Huang,et al.  Signal quality assessment of retinal optical coherence tomography images. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography: A new tool for glaucoma diagnosis , 1995, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[9]  E A Swanson,et al.  Quantification of nerve fiber layer thickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Agreement between spectral-domain and time-domain OCT for measuring RNFL thickness , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[12]  William J Feuer,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer measurements using time domain and spectral domain optical coherent tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Risto Myllylä,et al.  Automated retinal shadow compensation of optical coherence tomography images. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  Johannes F de Boer,et al.  The effect of glaucoma on the optical attenuation coefficient of the retinal nerve fiber layer in spectral domain optical coherence tomography images. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  Evelyn Regar,et al.  Fully automatic three‐dimensional quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography , 2009, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[16]  Makoto Nakamura,et al.  Agreement among three types of spectral-domain optical coherent tomography instruments in measuring parapapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  Mark B Horton,et al.  Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[18]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  K. Sung,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Hiroshi Ishikawa,et al.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurement bias and imprecision across three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography devices. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Juan Xu,et al.  Three dimensional optical coherence tomography imaging: Advantages and advances , 2010, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[22]  Christoph Tappeiner,et al.  Impact of optic media opacities and image compression on quantitative analysis of optical coherence tomography. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.