The Nature of the Sound Codes Accessed by Visual Language

Abstract The nature of the sound codes accessed by visual words was explored in four experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 employed a homophony judgment task and Experiments 3 and 4 employed a lexical decision task. Experiments 1 and 3 compared phonetic pseudohomophones (phonetic PHs) such as nootle to various controls including phonemic PHs such as speek. Phonemic PHs were more easily judged as sounding like words than phonetic PHs, but other comparisons indicated that both phonetic and phonemic codes were involved in homophony judgments. In contrast, only phonetic codes were clearly implicated in the lexical decision task. Experiments 2 and 4 compared PHs whose morphemic complexity mismatched the baseword (e.g., counce ) to PHs whose morphemic complexity matched the baseword (e.g., discloaz ). There was a clear effect of morphemic mismatching in the homophony judgment task, but little or no effect of morphemic mismatching in the lexical decision task. These data suggested that morphological structure is part of phonemic coding but not part of phonetic coding.

[1]  C. Perfetti,et al.  A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English , 1995 .

[2]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition , 1971 .

[3]  H. Hawkins,et al.  Flexible coding in word recognition. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  G. Underwood Strategies of information processing , 1980 .

[5]  M. Taft Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M. Turvey,et al.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Interactive Processes in Reading , 1981 .

[8]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  C. Beauvillain,et al.  The Integration of Morphological and Whole-Word Form Information during Eye Fixations on Prefixed and Suffixed Words ☆ , 1996 .

[10]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[11]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Robert A. Fox,et al.  Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English , 1977 .

[13]  Chun R. Luo,et al.  How is word meaning accessed in reading? Evidence from the phonologically mediated interference effect. , 1996 .

[14]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Word Identification Proceed From Spelling to Sound to Meaning , 1991 .

[15]  M. Coltheart Lexical access in simple reading tasks , 1978 .

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Representation and processing of derived words , 1987 .

[17]  Derek Besner,et al.  Phonological recoding and lexical access , 1978 .

[18]  A. J. Marcel,et al.  Aphasia, Dyslexia and the Phonological Coding of Written Words , 1977 .

[19]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking*1 , 1988 .

[20]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological Codes Are Automatically Activated During Reading: Evidence From an Eye Movement Priming Paradigm , 1995 .

[21]  Pseudohomophone effects and models of word recognition. , 1996 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  The psychology of reading , 1989 .

[23]  D. McCutchen Phoneme-Specific Interference in Reading: The Tongue-Twister Effect Revisited. , 1991 .

[24]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[25]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  D. Besner,et al.  Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: evidence for phonological processing. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[27]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .

[28]  M. Joos A Phonological Dilemma in Canadian English , 1942 .

[29]  G. C. Orden,et al.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  R. Venezky The Structure of English Orthography , 1965 .

[31]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  V. Zue,et al.  Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .

[33]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[34]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[35]  M. Turvey,et al.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  G. C. Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading , 1987 .

[37]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[39]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.