Efficacy and safety of inhaled insulin (Exubera) compared with subcutaneous insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes: results of a 6-month, randomized, comparative trial.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine whether premeal pulmonary delivery of rapid-acting, dry-powder insulin (Exubera) plus Ultralente could provide glycemic control comparable to a conventional insulin regimen in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Three hundred thirty-five subjects were randomly assigned to receive either premeal inhaled insulin plus bedtime Ultralente or two to three injections of regular and NPH insulin for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a change in HbA(1c). RESULTS Mean decreases in HbA(1c) values were comparable for inhaled (8.1-7.9%) and conventional groups (8.1-7.7%) (adjusted treatment group difference 0.16% [95% CI -0.01 to 0.32]). There were greater reductions for inhaled versus conventional regimen in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (adjusted mean change differences -25.17 and -30.28 mg/dl, respectively [95% CI -43.39 to -6.95 and -54.58 to -5.97, respectively]). Hypoglycemia (events/subject month) was lower for the inhaled (8.6) versus the conventional (9.0) group (risk ratio, 0.96 [95% CI 0.93-0.99]). In subjects receiving inhaled insulin, increased insulin antibody levels were observed, but there were no associated clinical or laboratory changes. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Mild to moderate cough was more frequent in the inhaled insulin group (27 vs. 5%) but decreased during the treatment. Pulmonary function tests were not different between the groups except for a greater decrease in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in the inhaled insulin group. Treatment satisfaction was greater in the inhaled than in the conventional group. CONCLUSIONS Inhaled insulin is effective, well tolerated, and well accepted in patients with type 1 diabetes and provides glycemic control comparable to that with a conventional insulin regimen.

[1]  W. Cefalu,et al.  Efficacy of inhaled human insulin in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomised proof-of-concept study , 2001, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Reichard,et al.  The effect of long-term intensified insulin treatment on the development of microvascular complications of diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Raccah,et al.  Immunogenicity of Long-Term Intraperitoneal Insulin Administration With Implantable Programmable Pumps: Metabolic consequences , 1995, Diabetes Care.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretative strategies. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[5]  王姮,et al.  Inhaled insulin , 2005 .

[6]  S. Genuth,et al.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Rawlins,et al.  Inhaled insulin , 2006, The Lancet.

[8]  R. Gerber,et al.  Treatment satisfaction with inhaled insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[9]  K. Yoh.  Diabetes Mellitus and Exercise , 1996, Diabetes Care.

[10]  W. Cefalu,et al.  Inhaled Human Insulin Treatment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  N. Jeandidier,et al.  Immunogenicity of intraperitoneal insulin infusion using programmable implantable devices , 1995, Diabetologia.

[12]  J. Patton,et al.  (D) Routes of delivery: Case studies , 1992 .

[13]  L. Heinemann,et al.  Time–action Profile of Inhaled Insulin , 1997, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[14]  R. Gerber,et al.  Development and factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with injected and inhaled insulin for type 1 diabetes. , 2000, Diabetes care.