Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Refractory Pudendal Neuralgia.

BACKGROUND Pudendal neuralgia (PN) is one of the most common forms of genital pain. Only 42.2% of PN patients respond to the first-line treatment. Novel neuromodulation techniques in the treatment of refractory PN patients are urgently required. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment effects and adverse events of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for patients with refractory PN. STUDY DESIGN A prospective nonrandomized study. SETTING This prospective analysis included 33 patients who received the phase II surgical implantation. METHODS A total of 55 eligible PN patients were recruited for SNS treatment after informed consent, and 33 of 55 patients with a minimum 50% improvement were candidates for surgical implantation. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Self-rating Anxiety and Depression Scale, Quality of life score (SF-36), and sleep monitoring indicators before and after surgery were used to assess the effects of SNS on patients with refractory PN. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were included in the final analysis, involving 24 women and 9 men with a mean age of 49.5 years (26-70 years). There was a favorable decrease in pain severity (VAS scores) from 7.1 ± 1.1 at baseline to 6.1 ± 1.0 on postoperative day 1, and 2.8 ± 0.7 at 1 week, 1.7 ± 0.5 at 1 month, 1.1 ± 0.7 at 6 months, and 1.0 ± 0.6 at 12 months after surgery, respectively (P < 0.05). The mean score of each section of SF-36 after SNS was significantly higher than that at baseline (P < 0.05). Total sleep time and sleep time in each period were significantly prolonged after SNS implantation compared with that before surgery (6 months vs Pre, total: 5.32 ± 1.49 hours vs 3.66 ± 1.19 hours, deep: 2.52 ± 0.63 hours vs 1.36 ± 0.43 hours, light: 1.78 ± 0.42 hours vs 0.99 ± 0.30 hours, rapid eye movement: 1.41 ± 0.29 hours vs 0.89 ± 0.27 hours, P < 0.05). No serious device complications were reported during the follow-up period. LIMITATIONS Large-scale randomized clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the risk factors for prediction of refractory PN. CONCLUSIONS These data imply that SNS can have beneficial effects on patients with refractory PN.

[1]  K. Matzel,et al.  Sacral Neuromodulation: Standardized Electrode Placement Technique , 2017, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[2]  X. Zhang,et al.  [Short-term outcome of sacral neuromodulation on refractory interstitial cystitis/pelvic pain syndrome]. , 2016, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi.

[3]  F. Wille,et al.  S3 Dorsal Root Ganglion/Nerve Root Stimulation for Refractory Postsurgical Perineal Pain: Technical Aspects of Anchorless Sacral Transforaminal Lead Placement , 2016, Case reports in neurological medicine.

[4]  P. Sokal,et al.  Sacral roots stimulation in chronic pelvic pain. , 2015, Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska.

[5]  K. Buffenoir,et al.  Spinal cord stimulation of the conus medullaris for refractory pudendal neuralgia: A prospective study of 27 consecutive cases , 2015, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[6]  I. Millán,et al.  Chronic Perineal Pain: Analyses of Prognostic Factors in Pudendal Neuralgia , 2013, The Clinical journal of pain.

[7]  C. Vaizey,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation: an effective treatment for chronic functional anal pain? , 2013, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[8]  B. Bataille,et al.  Successful treatment of pudendal neuralgia with tricolumn spinal cord stimulation: case report. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[9]  H. E. Eker,et al.  Transsacral S2-S4 nerve block for vaginal pain due to pudendal neuralgia. , 2011, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[10]  T. Uppal,et al.  Chronic pelvic pain , 2011, Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine.

[11]  S. Kim,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of intractable pain associated with cauda equina syndrome. , 2010, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[12]  R. Kalff,et al.  [Spinal cord stimulation at the level of the conus medullaris : treatment option for therapy-resistant postoperative neuralgia of the pudendal nerve]. , 2009, Schmerz.

[13]  C. Gharibo,et al.  Successful treatment of refractory pudendal neuralgia with pulsed radiofrequency. , 2009, Pain physician.

[14]  S. Antolak,et al.  Therapeutic pudendal nerve blocks using corticosteroids cure pelvic pain after failure of sacral neuromodulation. , 2009, Pain medicine.

[15]  J. Lefaucheur,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for pudendal neuralgia by pudendal nerve entrapment (Nantes criteria) , 2008, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[16]  J. Dubuisson,et al.  [Sacral staged reflexes to localize the pudendal compression: an anatomical validation of the concept]. , 2006, Revue medicale suisse.

[17]  S. Raoul,et al.  Decompression and transposition of the pudendal nerve in pudendal neuralgia: a randomized controlled trial and long-term evaluation. , 2005, European urology.

[18]  S. Raoul,et al.  Anatomic basis of chronic perineal pain: role of the pudendal nerve , 1998, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[19]  K. Oleson,et al.  Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic intractable pelvic pain. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[20]  M. Hassouna,et al.  Sacral Root Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Various Voiding and Storage Problems , 1999, International Urogynecology Journal.