Clinical course of 602 patients with Takayasu's arteritis: comparison between Childhood-onset versus adult onset disease.

OBJECTIVES To describe the clinical profile of Asian Indian patients with Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) and to compare clinical features and outcome of childhood-onset Takayasu's arteritis (cTAK) with adult-onset TAK (aTAK). METHODS Data related to clinical features and response to treatment of patients with cTAK (age of onset <16 years) and aTAK from a large observational cohort in our tertiary care teaching hospital were noted and compared. RESULTS Altogether, 602 patients (cTAK = 119; aTAK = 483) were studied. Patients with cTAK had a blunted female: male ratio; but fever, elevated acute phase reactants, involvement of abdominal aorta or its branches, hypertension, abdominal pain, elevated serum creatinine and cardiomyopathy were more common in cTAK as compared with aTAK. Patients with aTAK were more likely to have aortic-arch disease and claudication than cTAK. During follow-up, complete remission was more common in cTAK (87% vs 66%; P < 0.01), but subsequent relapses were equally common (30% vs 27%; P = 0.63). Independent associations of disease duration at presentation with disease extent [Disease Extent Index in TAK (DEI.Tak)] and damage [TAK Damage Score (TADS)] were observed (P ≤ 0.01). Moreover, 54% of patients with symptom duration of >5 years at presentation still continued to have elevated CRP suggesting continued and active inflammation warranting escalation or inititation of immunosuppression. CONCLUSION Patients with cTAK are more likely to have arterial disease below the diaphragm, systemic inflammation and achieve remission. Disease of the aortic arch is more common in patients with aTAK. Longer duration of symptoms prior to initiation of immunosuppression, thereby leading to extensive disease and damage, reflects ongoing disease activity as the rule rather than exception in untreated TAK.

[1]  Haiying Wu,et al.  Clinical course and prognostic factors of childhood Takayasu’s arteritis: over 15-year comprehensive analysis of 101 patients , 2019, Arthritis Research & Therapy.

[2]  D. Hébert,et al.  Presentation and Disease Course of Childhood‐Onset Versus Adult‐Onset Takayasu Arteritis , 2018, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[3]  L. Jayaseelan,et al.  Long-term outcome of 251 patients with Takayasu arteritis on combination immunosuppressant therapy: Single centre experience from a large tertiary care teaching hospital in Southern India. , 2017, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[4]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Complications in Takayasu Arteritis: A Multicenter Study of 318 Patients , 2017, Circulation.

[5]  P. Merkel,et al.  Vasculitis in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases: A study of 32 patients and systematic review of the literature. , 2016, Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism.

[6]  T. Miyata,et al.  Current Clinical Features of New Patients With Takayasu Arteritis Observed From Cross-Country Research in Japan: Age and Sex Specificity , 2015, Circulation.

[7]  R. Misra,et al.  Pediatric-onset Takayasu’s arteritis: clinical features and short-term outcome , 2015, Rheumatology International.

[8]  Chang-Keun Lee,et al.  Outcome of Takayasu Arteritis with Inactive Disease at Diagnosis: The Extent of Vascular Involvement As a Predictor of Activation , 2015, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[9]  Haiying Wu,et al.  Clinical Manifestations and Longterm Outcome for Patients with Takayasu Arteritis in China , 2014, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[10]  S. Spalding,et al.  Takayasu Arteritis in the pediatric population: a contemporary United States-Based Single Center Cohort , 2014, Pediatric Rheumatology.

[11]  P. Bacon,et al.  Childhood-onset Takayasu Arteritis — Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in South India , 2014, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[12]  V. Ferriani,et al.  Takayasu arteritis in a Brazilian multicenter study: children with a longer diagnosis delay than adolescents. , 2014, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[13]  Rajiva Gupta,et al.  Development and initial validation of the Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS2010). , 2013, Rheumatology.

[14]  L. Cooper,et al.  Diagnostic features, treatment, and outcomes of Takayasu arteritis in a US cohort of 126 patients. , 2013, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[15]  J. de Carvalho,et al.  Juvenile-onset Takayasu arteritis: peculiar vascular involvement and more refractory disease , 2010, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[16]  B. Feldman,et al.  Takayasu arteritis in children and adolescents. , 2010, Rheumatology.

[17]  G. Hunder,et al.  The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Takayasu arteritis. , 2010, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  Z. Jing,et al.  Takayasu’s arteritis: clinical features and outcomes of 125 patients in China , 2010, Clinical Rheumatology.

[19]  P. Cluzel,et al.  Takayasu Arteritis in France: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 82 Cases Comparing White, North African, and Black Patients , 2010, Medicine.

[20]  K. Maksimowicz-McKinnon,et al.  Limitations of therapy and a guarded prognosis in an American cohort of Takayasu arteritis patients. , 2007, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  P Woo,et al.  EULAR/PReS endorsed consensus criteria* for the classification of childhood vasculitides , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  P. Bacon,et al.  OP14. THE INDIAN PERSPECTIVE OF TAKAYASU ARTERITIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF A DISEASE EXTENT INDEX (DEI.TAK) TO ASSESS TAKAYASU ARTERITIS , 2005 .

[23]  E. Daina,et al.  Takayasu's arteritis: A study of 104 Italian patients. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  N. Garg,et al.  Role of immunosuppressive therapy on clinical, immunological, and angiographic outcome in active Takayasu's arteritis. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[25]  S. Jain,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for Takayasu arteritis. , 1996, International journal of cardiology.

[26]  N. Ganguly,et al.  Current status of Takayasu arteritis in India. , 1996, International journal of cardiology.

[27]  T. Kakuta,et al.  Takayasu arteritis--five doctors in the history of Takayasu arteritis. , 1996, International journal of cardiology.

[28]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Long-term outcome for 120 Japanese patients with Takayasu's disease. Clinical and statistical analyses of related prognostic factors. , 1994, Circulation.

[29]  K. G. Balakrishnan,et al.  Natural history of aortoarteritis (Takayasu's disease). , 1989, Circulation.

[30]  K. Ishikawa,et al.  Diagnostic approach and proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of Takayasu's arteriopathy. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  M. Isobe,et al.  Improved prognosis of Takayasu arteritis over the past decade--comprehensive analysis of 106 patients. , 2012, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[32]  O. Karadag,et al.  Takayasu's arteritis in Turkey - clinical and angiographic features of 248 patients. , 2009, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[33]  F. Numano,et al.  Takayasu arteritis: Follow-up studies for 20 years , 2005, Heart and Vessels.

[34]  F. Numano The story of Takayasu arteritis. , 2002, Rheumatology.

[35]  Guy Hoffman,et al.  Takayasu Arteritis , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[36]  E. Lupi-Herrera,et al.  Takayasu's arteritis. Clinical study of 107 cases. , 1977, American heart journal.