Driving risk assessment using driving behavior data under continuous tunnel environment

Abstract Objective: Driving behavior is the key feature for determining the nature of traffic stream qualities and reflecting the risk of operating environments. However, evaluating the driving risk accurately and practically in continuous tunnels (tunnels with a space more than 250 m and less than 1000 m) still faces severe challenges due to the complex driving conditions. The objective of this study is to predict the driving risk indicators and determine different risk levels. Methods: The naturalistic driving system equipped with a road environment and driving behavior data acquisition system combined with the fixed-point test method was used for data collection in 130 tunnels on four highways. A traditional AASHTO braking model and convex hull algorithm were adopted to predict the critical safety speed and the critical time headway of each risk feature point in tunnels. According to the risk constraints under free-flow, car-following and lane-changing conditions, the average traffic flow risk index (TFRI) representing six risk levels and the safety threshold of the corresponding risk indicators were determined. Results: The findings of this study revealed that the critical safety speed at nighttime is slower than in other daytime conditions in continuous tunnels. The time headway slightly changes under 90 km/h. As the speed continues to increase, speed has a significant influence on the critical time headway. The only reliable interaction involved the different adverse weather conditions on the mean critical safety speed in the continuous tunnels (short plus long) (F = 9.730, p<0.05) and single long tunnels (F = 12.365, p<0.05). Conclusions: It can be concluded that driving behaviors significantly vary in different tunnel risk feature points and the combined effect of high speed and luminance variation may result in high driving risk. The performance validation indicted that the risk assessment level determined by the proposed approach is consistent with the real safety situations. The study provides an effective and generally acceptable method for identifying driving risk criteria that can also be applied for traffic management and safety countermeasures with a view to possible implementation in continuous tunnels.

[1]  Fabrizio D'Amico,et al.  A Study of the Effects of Road Tunnel on Driver Behavior and Road Safety Using Driving Simulator , 2013 .

[2]  Peter Danišovič,et al.  Risk Analysis in Road Tunnels , 2014 .

[3]  Laura Eboli,et al.  How to define the accident risk level of car drivers by combining objective and subjective measures of driving style , 2017 .

[4]  Zoe Nivolianitou,et al.  Embedding the human factor in road tunnel risk analysis , 2014 .

[5]  Juan de Oña,et al.  Socio-economic and driving experience factors affecting drivers’ perceptions of traffic crash risk , 2016 .

[6]  B Kohl,et al.  Risk Analysis for Road Tunnels , 2007 .

[7]  Ricardo Almeida de Melo,et al.  Revising the AASHTO Curve: Accident Involvement Rates for Trucks and Speed Differentials on Highway Grades , 2007 .

[8]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[9]  Konstantinos Kirytopoulos,et al.  Challenges for current quantitative risk assessment (QRA) models to describe explicitly the road tunnel safety level , 2014 .

[10]  Jinjun Tang,et al.  Crash injury severity analysis using a two-layer Stacking framework. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Laura Eboli,et al.  How to identify the key factors that affect driver perception of accident risk. A comparison between Italian and Spanish driver behavior. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Nour-Eddin El Faouzi,et al.  Parameters of Time Headway Distribution as Performance Indicators of Motorway Traffic and Driver Behavior , 2012 .

[13]  Feng Guo,et al.  Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  E Worm HUMAN BEHAVIOUR INFLUENCING TUNNEL SAFETY , 2003 .

[15]  Alan N. Beard Tunnel safety, risk assessment and decision-making , 2010 .

[16]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment? , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Haoxue Liu,et al.  Influence of light zones on drivers' visual fixation characteristics and traffic safety in extra-long tunnels , 2017, Traffic injury prevention.

[18]  Zohreh Azimifar,et al.  A Novel Motion Plane-Based Approach to Vehicle Speed Estimation , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[20]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Traffic conflicts and exposure , 1982 .