Development of VariLeg, an exoskeleton with variable stiffness actuation: first results and user evaluation from the CYBATHLON 2016

BackgroundPowered exoskeletons are a promising approach to restore the ability to walk after spinal cord injury (SCI). However, current exoskeletons remain limited in their walking speed and ability to support tasks of daily living, such as stair climbing or overcoming ramps. Moreover, training progress for such advanced mobility tasks is rarely reported in literature. The work presented here aims to demonstrate the basic functionality of the VariLeg exoskeleton and its ability to enable people with motor complete SCI to perform mobility tasks of daily life.MethodsVariLeg is a novel powered lower limb exoskeleton that enables adjustments to the compliance in the leg, with the objective of improving the robustness of walking on uneven terrain. This is achieved by an actuation system with variable mechanical stiffness in the knee joint, which was validated through test bench experiments. The feasibility and usability of the exoskeleton was tested with two paraplegic users with motor complete thoracic lesions at Th4 and Th12. The users trained three times a week, in 60 min sessions over four months with the aim of participating in the CYBATHLON 2016 competition, which served as a field test for the usability of the exoskeleton. The progress on basic walking skills and on advanced mobility tasks such as incline walking and stair climbing is reported. Within this first study, the exoskeleton was used with a constant knee stiffness.ResultsTest bench evaluation of the variable stiffness actuation system demonstrate that the stiffness could be rendered with an error lower than 30 Nm/rad. During training with the exoskeleton, both users acquired proficient skills in basic balancing, walking and slalom walking. In advanced mobility tasks, such as climbing ramps and stairs, only basic (needing support) to intermediate (able to perform task independently in 25% of the attempts) skill levels were achieved. After 4 months of training, one user competed at the CYBATHLON 2016 and was able to perform 3 (stand-sit-stand, slalom and tilted path) out of 6 obstacles of the track. No adverse events occurred during the training or the competition.ConclusionDemonstration of the applicability to restore ambulation for people with motor complete SCI was achieved. The CYBATHLON highlighted the importance of training and gaining experience in piloting an exoskeleton, which were just as important as the technical realization of the robot.

[1]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[2]  野間 春生,et al.  Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems 参加報告 , 1997 .

[3]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Secondary conditions following spinal cord injury in a population-based sample , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[4]  P O Riley,et al.  Knee joint torques: a comparison between women and men during barefoot walking. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  H Barbeau,et al.  Functional community ambulation requirements in incomplete spinal cord injured subjects , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[6]  Michael G Fehlings,et al.  Medical co-morbidities, secondary complications, and mortality in elderly with acute spinal cord injury. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  Masayoshi Kubo,et al.  Increased musculoskeletal stiffness during load carriage at increasing walking speeds maintains constant vertical excursion of the body center of mass. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[9]  J. S. Sulzer,et al.  MARIONET: An exotendon-driven rotary series elastic actuator for exerting joint torque , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[10]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Exploiting Natural Dynamics to Reduce Energy Consumption by Controlling the Compliance of Soft Actuators , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Limb Alignment and Kinematics Inside a Lokomat Robotic Orthosis , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  F.C.T. van der Helm,et al.  Kinematic Design to Improve Ergonomics in Human Machine Interaction , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[13]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot , 2007, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[14]  H. van der Kooij,et al.  Design and Evaluation of the LOPES Exoskeleton Robot for Interactive Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Martin Buss,et al.  Compliant actuation of rehabilitation robots , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[16]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[17]  A. Hosman,et al.  Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[18]  Robert Riener,et al.  Generalized elasticities improve patient-cooperative control of rehabilitation robots , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[19]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  A methodology to design kinematics of fixations between an orthosis and a human member , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[20]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Influence of attachment pressure and kinematic configuration on pHRI with wearable robots , 2009 .

[21]  Andre Schiele Ergonomics of exoskeletons: Objective performance metrics , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[22]  J Middleton,et al.  Psychological morbidity and spinal cord injury: a systematic review , 2009, Spinal Cord.

[23]  R. Ham,et al.  Compliant actuator designs , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[24]  Axel Heinemann,et al.  Decubitus ulcers: pathophysiology and primary prevention. , 2010, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[25]  M. Daley,et al.  Two explanations for the compliant running paradox: reduced work of bouncing viscera and increased stability in uneven terrain , 2010, Biology Letters.

[26]  P. Beyl,et al.  The MACCEPA actuation system as torque actuator in the gait rehabilitation robot ALTACRO , 2010, 2010 3rd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[27]  Scott Tanner,et al.  Update on Distance and Velocity Requirements for Community Ambulation , 2010, Journal of geriatric physical therapy.

[28]  Domenico Campolo,et al.  Ergonomic considerations for anthropomorphic wrist exoskeletons: A simulation study on the effects of joint misalignment , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[29]  Denise G Tate,et al.  Depression after spinal cord injury: comorbidities, mental health service use, and adequacy of treatment. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[31]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[32]  Robert Riener,et al.  Model-Based Estimation of Knee Stiffness , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  T. Hoellinger,et al.  MINDWALKER: Going one step further with assistive lower limbs exoskeleton for SCI condition subjects , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[34]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[35]  V. Dietz,et al.  The physiological basis of neurorehabilitation - locomotor training after spinal cord injury , 2013, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[36]  S. Kolakowsky-Hayner,et al.  Safety and Feasibility of using the EksoTM Bionic Exoskeleton to Aid Ambulation after Spinal Cord Injury , 2013 .

[37]  P. Schwenkreis,et al.  Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[38]  Jonathon W. Sensinger,et al.  Towards Biomimetic Virtual Constraint Control of a Powered Prosthetic Leg , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[39]  Katie Gant,et al.  Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[42]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[43]  Nebahat Sezer,et al.  Chronic complications of spinal cord injury. , 2015, World journal of orthopedics.

[44]  Clare Hartigan,et al.  Mobility Outcomes Following Five Training Sessions with a Powered Exoskeleton. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[45]  Yiannis Koumpouros,et al.  A Systematic Review on Existing Measures for the Subjective Assessment of Rehabilitation and Assistive Robot Devices , 2016, Journal of healthcare engineering.

[46]  Aaron D. Ames,et al.  Realizing dynamic and efficient bipedal locomotion on the humanoid robot DURUS , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[47]  Steven Knezevic,et al.  Training Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Ambulate Using a Powered Exoskeleton , 2016, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[48]  Bing Chen,et al.  Recent developments and challenges of lower extremity exoskeletons , 2015, Journal of orthopaedic translation.

[49]  Robert Riener,et al.  The Cybathlon promotes the development of assistive technology for people with physical disabilities , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[50]  L. Miller,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis , 2016, Medical devices.

[51]  J. V. van Middendorp,et al.  Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.

[52]  Byeonghun Na,et al.  WalkON Suit: A Medalist in the Powered Exoskeleton Race of Cybathlon 2016 , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[53]  Jesper Smith,et al.  Stepping Forward with Exoskeletons: Team IHMC?s Design and Approach in the 2016 Cybathlon , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[54]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Design and Characterization of an Exoskeleton for Perturbing the Knee During Gait , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[55]  Mukul Talaty,et al.  Powered Exoskeletons for Walking Assistance in Persons with Central Nervous System Injuries: A Narrative Review , 2017, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[56]  Auke Jan Ijspeert,et al.  Bio-inspired control of joint torque and knee stiffness in a robotic lower limb exoskeleton using a central pattern generator , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[57]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  TWIICE — A lightweight lower-limb exoskeleton for complete paraplegics , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).