Characterization of atrial arrhythmias in body surface potential mapping: A computational study

PURPOSE Atrial tachycardia (AT), flutter (AFL) and fibrillation (AF) are very common cardiac arrhythmias and are driven by localized sources that can be ablation targets. Non-invasive body surface potential mapping (BSPM) can be useful for early diagnosis and ablation planning. We aimed to characterize and differentiate the arrhythmic mechanisms behind AT, AFL and AF from the BSPM perspective using basic features reflecting their electrophysiology. METHODS 19 simulations of 567-lead BSPMs were used to obtain dominant frequency (DF) maps and estimate the atrial driving frequencies using the highest DF (HDF). Regions with |DF-HDF|≤1Hz were segmented and characterized (size, area); the spatial distribution of the differences |DF-atrialHDFestimate| was qualitatively analyzed. Phase singularity points (SPs) were detected on maps generated with Hilbert transform after band-pass filtering around the HDF (±1Hz). Connected SPs along time (filaments) and their histogram (heatmaps) were used for rotational activity characterization (duration, spatiotemporal stability). Results were reproduced in clinical layouts (252 to 12 leads) and with different rotations and translations of the atria within the torso, and compared with the original 567-lead outcomes using structural similarity index (SSIM) between maps, sensitivity and precision in SP detection and direct feature comparison. Random forest and least-square based algorithms were used to classify the arrhythmias and their mechanisms' location, respectively, based on the obtained features. RESULTS Frequency and phase analyses revealed distinct behavior between arrhythmias. AT and AFL presented uniform DF maps with low variance, while AF maps were more heterogeneous. Lower differences from the atrial HDF regions correlated with the driver location. Rotational activity was most stable in AFL, followed by AT and AF. Features were robust to lower spatial resolution layouts and modifications in the atrial geometry; DF and heatmaps presented decreasing SSIM along the layouts. The classification of the arrhythmias and their mechanisms' location achieved balanced accuracy of 72.0% and 73.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION Non-invasive characterization of AT, AFL and AF based on realistic models highlights intrinsic differences between the arrhythmias, enhancing the BSPM utility as an auxiliary clinical tool.

[1]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Technical Considerations on Phase Mapping for Identification of Atrial Reentrant Activity in Direct- and Inverse-Computed Electrograms , 2017, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[2]  Kim Christensen,et al.  Machine learning methods for locating re-entrant drivers from electrograms in a model of atrial fibrillation , 2017, Royal Society Open Science.

[3]  Prashanthan Sanders,et al.  Spectral Analysis Identifies Sites of High-Frequency Activity Maintaining Atrial Fibrillation in Humans , 2005, Circulation.

[4]  Mathias Wilhelms,et al.  Computational modeling of the human atrial anatomy and electrophysiology , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[5]  Douglas P. Zipes,et al.  Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 2012 .

[6]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Treatment of atrial fibrillation by the ablation of localized sources: CONFIRM (Conventional Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation With or Without Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation) trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Erick A. Perez Alday,et al.  Novel non-invasive algorithm to identify the origins of re-entry and ectopic foci in the atria from 64-lead ECGs: A computational study , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[8]  Aacc,et al.  2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Management of Adult Patients With Supraventricular Tachycardia: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2016, Circulation.

[9]  Sujit Kumar Sahoo,et al.  Detection of Atrial fibrillation from non-episodic ECG data: A review of methods , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  María S. Guillem,et al.  Phase singularity point tracking for the identification of typical and atypical flutter patients: A clinical-computational study , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[11]  Francisco Castells,et al.  Surface Wavefront Propagation Maps: Non-invasive characterization of atrial flutter circuit , 2009 .

[12]  Antonio Criminisi,et al.  Decision Forests for Computer Vision and Medical Image Analysis , 2013, Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Philip Langley,et al.  Non-Invasive Estimation Of Left Atrial Dominant Frequency In Atrial Fibrillation From Different Electrode Sites: Insight From Body Surface Potential Mapping. , 2014, Journal of atrial fibrillation.

[14]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Methodology Considerations in Phase Mapping of Human Cardiac Arrhythmias , 2016, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[15]  Jun Guo,et al.  Accurate detection of atrial fibrillation from 12-lead ECG using deep neural network , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  J Clémenty,et al.  Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Minimal configuration of body surface potential mapping for discrimination of left versus right dominant frequencies during atrial fibrillation , 2017, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[18]  Jason Ng,et al.  Understanding and Interpreting Dominant Frequency Analysis of AF Electrograms , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[19]  A. Skanes,et al.  Spatiotemporal periodicity during atrial fibrillation in the isolated sheep heart. , 1998, Circulation.

[20]  Jonathan Rubin,et al.  Cardiac arrhythmia detection using deep learning: A review. , 2019, Journal of electrocardiology.

[21]  Xin Li,et al.  Systematic differences of non-invasive dominant frequency estimation compared to invasive dominant frequency estimation in atrial fibrillation , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  José Jalife,et al.  Comparison of radiofrequency catheter ablation of drivers and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation: a noninferiority randomized multicenter RADAR-AF trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Robert Ploutz-Snyder,et al.  Real-time dominant frequency mapping and ablation of dominant frequency sites in atrial fibrillation with left-to-right frequency gradients predicts long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[24]  Victor Gonçalves Marques,et al.  A robust wavelet-based approach for dominant frequency analysis of atrial fibrillation in body surface signals , 2020, Physiological measurement.

[25]  D. Haines,et al.  Assessment of Global Atrial Fibrillation Organization to Optimize Timing of Atrial Defibrillation , 2001, Circulation.

[26]  Vincent Jacquemet,et al.  Vectorcardiographic lead systems for the characterization of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, Journal of electrocardiology.

[27]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Highest dominant frequency and rotor positions are robust markers of driver location during noninvasive mapping of atrial fibrillation: A computational study. , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[28]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Arrhythmia detection using deep convolutional neural network with long duration ECG signals , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[29]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Singularity detection and processing with wavelets , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[30]  João Loures Salinet,et al.  A 64-lead body surface potential mapping system , 2017, 2017 Computing in Cardiology (CinC).

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Presence and stability of rotors in atrial fibrillation: evidence and therapeutic implications. , 2016, Cardiovascular research.

[33]  Omer Berenfeld,et al.  Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: a clinical-computational study. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[34]  Ashok J. Shah,et al.  Driver Domains in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Circulation.

[35]  A. Kadish,et al.  Effect of electrogram characteristics on the relationship of dominant frequency to atrial activation rate in atrial fibrillation. , 2006, Heart rhythm.