A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants

Gas-exchange measurements on Eucalyptus grandis leaves and data extracted from the literature were used to test a semi-empirical model of stomatal conductance for CO 2 , g sc = g 0 + a 1 /[(c s −Γ)(1 + D s /D 0 )], where A is the assimilation rate; D s and c s are the humidity deficit and the CO 2 concentration at the leaf surface, respectively; g 0 is the conductance as A → 0 when leaf irradiance → 0; and D 0 and a 1 are empirical coefficients. This model is a modified version of g sc = a 1 A h s /c s first proposed by Ball, Woodrow & Berry (1987, in Progress in Photosynthesis Research, Martinus Mijhoff, Publ., pp. 221-224), in which h s is relative humidity. Inclusion of the CO 2 compensation point, Γ, improved the behaviour of the model at low values of c s , while a hyperbolic function of D s for humidity response correctly accounted for the observed hyperbolic and linear variation of g sc and c i /c s as a function of D s , where c i is the intercellular CO 2 concentration. In contrast, use of relative humidity as the humidity variable led to predictions of a linear decrease in g sc and a hyperbolic variation in c i /c s as a function of D s , contrary to data from E. grandis leaves. The revised model also successfully described the response of stomata to variations in A, D s and c s for published responses of the leaves of several other species. Coupling of the revised stomatal model with a biochemical model for photosynthesis of C 3 plants synthesizes many of the observed responses of leaves to light, humidity deficit, leaf temperature and CO 2 concentration. Best results are obtained for well-watered plants

[1]  C. Field,et al.  A reanalysis using improved leaf models and a new canopy integration scheme , 1992 .

[2]  R. Leuning,et al.  A model of canopy photosynthesis and water use incorporating a mechanistic formulation of leaf CO2 exchange , 1992 .

[3]  James F. Reynolds,et al.  Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2 , 1992 .

[4]  J. Walker,et al.  Simulations of Hydroecological Responses to Elevated CO2 at the Catchment Scale , 1992 .

[5]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[6]  J. Cheeseman PATCHY: simulating and visualizing the effects of stomatal patchiness on photosynthetic CO2 exchange studies , 1991 .

[7]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox , 1991 .

[8]  T. Carlson Modeling stomatal resistance: an overview of the 1989 workshop at the Pennsylvania State University , 1991 .

[9]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Stomatal and surface conductance of tropical rainforest , 1991 .

[10]  Jerry L. Hatfield,et al.  Discerning the forest from the trees: an essay on scaling canopy stomatal conductance , 1991 .

[11]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[12]  J. Lloyd Modelling Stomatal Responses to Environment in Macadamia integrifolia , 1991 .

[13]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Do stomata respond to relative humidity , 1991 .

[14]  Paul G. Jarvis,et al.  Description and validation of an array model - MAESTRO. , 1990 .

[15]  M. Kirschbaum,et al.  Photosynthetic responses to phosphorus nutrition in Eucalyptus grandis seedlings , 1990 .

[16]  Ray Leuning,et al.  Modelling Stomatal Behaviour and and Photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis , 1990 .

[17]  B. Loveys,et al.  Non‐uniform stomatal closure induced by water stress causes putative non‐stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis , 1988 .

[18]  K. Mott,et al.  Do Stomata Respond to CO(2) Concentrations Other than Intercellular? , 1988, Plant physiology.

[19]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[20]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: II. Effects of Short-Term Exposures to Different Photon Flux Densities. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[21]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: I. Influence of Nitrogen Nutrition, Phosphorus Nutrition, Photon Flux Density, and Ambient Partial Pressure of CO(2) during Ontogeny. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[22]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Rate of CO(2) Assimilation: III. Influences of Water Stress and Photoinhibition. , 1985, Plant physiology.

[23]  D. W. Sheriff Epidermal transpiration and stomatal responses to humidity: Some hypotheses explored , 1984 .

[24]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  An Empirical Model of Stomatal Conductance , 1984 .

[25]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Photosynthetic and Stomatal Responses of Two Mangrove Species, Aegiceras corniculatum and Avicennia marina, to Long Term Salinity and Humidity Conditions. , 1984, Plant physiology.

[26]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Photosynthetic and Stomatal Responses of the Grey Mangrove, Avicennia marina, to Transient Salinity Conditions. , 1984, Plant physiology.

[27]  A. Laisk Calculation of Leaf Photosynthetic Parameters Considering the Statistical Distribution of Stomatal Apertures , 1983 .

[28]  R. L. Csiro,et al.  Transport of gases into leaves , 1983 .

[29]  P. Jarvis,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of light on stomata II. In Commelina communis L. , 1983 .

[30]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Leaf Conductance in Relation to Assimilation in Eucalyptus pauciflora Sieb. ex Spreng: Influence of Irradiance and Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide. , 1978, Plant physiology.

[31]  I. R. Cowan Stomatal Behaviour and Environment , 1978 .

[32]  P. Jarvis The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .