Machine Learning-Aided Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow

Though many approaches have been proposed in recent decades to solve the full AC optimal power flow (OPF) problem, efficiently finding the solution still remains challenging due to its highly non-linear and non-convex nature, especially for large scale networks. Machine learning has proven to significantly improve the computational efficiency in many problems. Thus in this paper, a learning augmented optimization approach is developed to solve the security-constrained optimal power flow (SCOPF) problem. More specifically, a multi-input multi-output random forest model is developed to first solve network voltage magnitudes and angles of buses. Then, physics-based network equations are employed to determine the current injection and complex/real power injection at different buses. To evaluate the efficiency of the proposed machine learning-aided algorithm, two benchmark models are adopted: (i) one with the conventional MATPOWER Interior Point Solver, and (ii) the other one with an end-to-end pure machine learning approach. Test results on a 500-bus network show that the proposed machine learning-aided approach has significantly improved the computational efficiency compared to the MATPOWER solver, while all network constraints are successfully satisfied.

[1]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Kyri Baker,et al.  Learning Warm-Start Points For Ac Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2019 IEEE 29th International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP).

[3]  Kyri Baker,et al.  Learning Optimal Solutions for Extremely Fast AC Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[4]  Shie Mannor,et al.  Supervised learning for optimal power flow as a real-time proxy , 2016, 2017 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT).

[5]  Xueping Gu,et al.  Neural-Network Security-Boundary Constrained Optimal Power Flow , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Richard P. O'Neill,et al.  History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations Optimal Power Flow Paper 1 , 2012 .

[7]  Tianyu Zhao,et al.  DeepOPF: Deep Neural Network for DC Optimal Power Flow , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm).

[8]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  Nearest Neighbors in Random Subspaces , 1998, SSPR/SPR.

[9]  Deepjyoti Deka,et al.  Learning for DC-OPF: Classifying active sets using neural nets , 2019, 2019 IEEE Milan PowerTech.

[10]  Henrik Linusson,et al.  MULTI-OUTPUT RANDOM FORESTS , 2013 .

[11]  Matt Wytock,et al.  Machine Learning for AC Optimal Power Flow , 2019, ArXiv.

[12]  Jerry Harris US , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas Navidi,et al.  Predicting Solutions to the Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2016 .

[14]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[15]  Sidhant Misra,et al.  Statistical Learning for DC Optimal Power Flow , 2018, 2018 Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC).