Single trial P300 detection in children using expert knowledge and SOM

Preliminary results of an automatic system for single trial P300 visual evoked potential events detection are presented. For each single trial P300, several candidate events were generated, and then filtered, using 3 wave features. The surviving candidate events were fed into a SOM-based classifier. A context filter was applied before the final output. No stationary condition of the P300 is involved in the algorithms. Recordings of 27 assessment sessions, each with 120 trials, were visually inspected by experts to identify and mark the P300 events, which was accomplished in about one third of the trials. The dataset was divided in training (18) and testing (9) subsets. The system identifies the initial and end times of the P300; it obtained a sensitivity of 53.9%, a specificity of 64.0% and an accuracy of 61.2% in the testing dataset.

[1]  Simon Hanslmayr,et al.  Alpha phase reset contributes to the generation of ERPs. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  J Anderson,et al.  Classification of single-trial ERP sub-types: application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[6]  J. Polich Updating P 300 : An Integrative Theory of P 3 a and P 3 b , 2009 .

[7]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[8]  Patricio Peirano,et al.  Iron‐deficiency anemia in infancy and poorer cognitive inhibitory control at age 10 years , 2013, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[9]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[11]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  Comparison of Classification Methods for P300 Brain-Computer Interface on Disabled Subjects , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..